I do have question, though: Why would Billy go from having his ear originally connected to his jaw like this: ( / ), to a full lobe: ( U ), when Paul has a connection like this: ( _ )? Whether it's surgery, makeup, ot prosthesis, it seems more difficult to make the wrong change than the correct one. The simplest explanation would be a third person.
....or, the prosthetic ear department lost the original ones they made, and got the specifications wrong on the remake. Maybe they weren't trying real hard to get it right. That's interesting. Or, maybe they thought that if they made him look a bit different in every photo shoot, people would get so confused they would just give up trying to make it jive. It should be noted that the number of people making these comparisons is doubling astronomically each tri-mester, and may hit 50 or even 60 by early 2007. A this rate, a disturbing 439 Beatle researchers may be suspicious enough by 2019 to start an ad hoc investigation.
Which of course, is even now triggering the commission of a 4,000 page Top-Secret MI-6 document entitled, "Report from TinMines Mountain; Beatle Security Breach Threat Level to Climb to Deep Orange by 2019" written by 'The Panel'*.
Parliament does not want to pay for it, primarily because they do not even know that it exists. In the case of the House of Lords voting it down, the Queen can dig into the revenue from the Tax on Scotch. So drink up. It's the greatest contribution we can make for billy now.
You paid attention to henrique2511 by commenting on their thread jpmfan. Understand your contradictions.
Hey you're kinda rude aren't you?!
Nice of you to take out of context what I said and twist it around...
Maybe I'm being too hard on you and you don't have the intellectual acumen to understand fully what I said and what was IMPLIED, which was that with proof of JPM being alive, I would pay attention to his statement that JPM is alive today.
Post by faithmccartney on Jun 24, 2012 9:25:03 GMT
He's Faul. Paul was left hand dominant, this man is right hand dominant and he looks very different from the "before 1966 Paul", in nose, hears, eyes and many other details. I absolutely think he's been replaced.
Post by ladymoonlight on Jul 23, 2013 23:05:24 GMT
Why did Paul suddenly seem to start wearing no shoes in videos? To cover up the extra inches in height! Why would someone wear a suit with bare feet? He said he turned up on the day "wearing flip flops"; what, with a suit? None of it makes sense and if it doesn't make sense, it's not true.