These psychics have been mostly accurate these past few years, don't mock them or you'll be surprised when we find out that they ARE telling the truth.
You've got to be kidding me! How can you say you have Christ in your heart and yet believe in psychics? Don't you know that, according to The Bible, consulting psychics, talking to the dead etc is forbidden - not only that, it is a fraud in any case. Your so-called afterlife band is a host of demons doing a charade. I can't believe you can call yourself a Christian and be so deceived!
I am really saddened but also angry about all of this. As a Pro-pro, I have worked with numerous top dogs over the years, and yes, sadly I've worked with Faul too (about 1992 in Cleveland, on some R&R Museum promos)! When that was going on, I never really thought about it, but Faul was easily 3 or 4 inches taller than I (I'm 5'10) and his soft brown 'Puppy Eyes' were not something that stuck out for me to notice. But having seen all of this I can now understand why. (No brown eyes there) I was also at his & Linda's ranch outside of Tucson a couple of times later in the 90s, and I honestly think Linda was totally duped, as were the rest of us. This whole thing totally disgusts me and really P's me off too. I am 110% behind you all on getting this clown out of our business and also trying to expose this total fraud and anyone involved for what it really is. Let me know if there is anything I can do to help, OK? Thanks!
You must remember, Linda may have been a good actress, but then again, she did fall in love with someone, whomever it was, right? And I can honestly say that Paul (or Faul) and Linda had a very good relationship, or at least what I saw of it!
You know, I feel so violated in some way by the very thought of Faul. I know this is not about me, but all these years I have seen Paul (Faul) on and off in circles and parties and never really even considered a fraud.
Another thought my wife and I had is this: How is this all effecting Ringo? He may know something and can't speak about it to anyone! What happens if he is subpeoned to testify in this process? Will someone be gunning for him?
And John, well, it's no wonder he went basically crazy in the mid 70s. With my best mate dead and a huge fraud going on, I would be so very confused. But you know, it now somehow makes sense to me why John left Cynthia so suddenly and so thoroughly in the 60s. Was he maybe trying to keep Cyn and Julian out of that loop? Safety? Fear? Think about it!
But you know, it now somehow makes sense to me why John left Cynthia so suddenly and so thoroughly in the 60s. Was he maybe trying to keep Cyn and Julian out of that loop? Safety? Fear? Think about it!
I agree. That would make sense. I think one of the reasons that John went nuts was because Paul was more then just his mate. He was his right hand. It was like losing his right hand. I don't think he EVER got over it. Yoko was just a poor substitute for Paul. No offense to Yoko, of course. I'm sure she did what she could to try to console John. I just wish that drugs weren't a part of it...< sigh > ...
And another thing! We are now witness to the ultimate Identity Theft. If enough of us are up in arms, an answer has to come out of it. I don't begrudge fame and fortune to someone who is who he/she is and accomplishes what he/she accomplishes. Heaven knows, we all look for recognition in our acheivements, but I wouldn't expect to be given credit for Jimi Hendrix's works! Where does this guy get off, anyway? The Beatles are now history, so this clown should ride his own laurals, if he can discover some. Leave our dead beloved in peace. Darn it, I say "Git a Rope!!!" And one more item, Chris! Ms. Ono is most definitely not a innocent bystander. I know this as fact, having myself performed on Milk & Honey and Starting Over!
Hi Mykel, Although I've never worked with any of the Beatles (played with the Kinks, though!), I have been very close (in proximity) to Paul in 1966 (Candlestick Park) and then met him and shook his hand around 1975-6 in London. I felt really odd about the encounter in London - I noticed right away that this man in front of me was way taller than the one I saw perform with the Beatles. And, of course, his general facial features were most certainly different. AND - this is what actually struck me at the time - this man in London had a completely different demeanor than the one I saw in 1966. All of this has made me feel very uneasy for many years. I didn't immediately sense fraud, but I couldn't explain it... ...and now I feel completely duped. I value honesty very highly; how does one explain to a 9 yr old boy who absolutely LOVES the Beatles that this Faul-character has been living/acting a lie for all this time? Enough already! Onlooker
Hiya TotalInfo! 1st off, give me the URL of the "Other Beatles" board. I'm not as yet familiar with it, please!
Now, I can say a little about Ono, but I don't know alot! As everyone knows, she was very manipulative and not one to take a back seat very well. Once she had John in her clutches, it was all over but the crying! I do believe that she was instrumental in John's demise, although I am not really at liberty to say much in that regard. Having worked with John, and David Geffen at that time, I am privy to some 'inside' info that has been , well, let's say, hushed up. I will say that Yoko was very involved in closing the door on 'Volare', Julian's song to John. She claimed some distorted view of plagerism and infringement and bought the verdict with John's own money. She also pushed Sean's musical endeavors even when they were lacking. But then, look at her own musical accomplishments. Needless to say, I have a very biased view of Ono in the whole affair. I do sincerely believe she was an agent of the 'evil doers' involved in the charade of Paul/Faul and was actually assigned in some way to keep John in line. I also believe she had only feelings of duty towards John's deep hurt over the phony concoction surrounding Paul/Faul. She had to keep him in check, at all costs. And I firmly believe that John was very close to finding out (if not already possessing the info) who took out Paul & Brian when he died, and that it was common knowledge that John had a mind of his own at times. I think that there was fear of him writing new music which would expose the truth and that was why he was eliminated. Of course, this is only my opinion, but it is not as far fetched as some of us would care to think.
Post by TotalInformation on Aug 21, 2003 6:42:22 GMT
Mykel -- if you go to the main page for the 60IF forums, the "Other Beatles" forum is the fifth one down.
I *think* there's a link on the assassination thread to an excerpt from a "behind the scenes rock-and-roll" book with an account of the recording of "Double Fantasy" (wasn't that recorded during the same sessions as Milk & Honey?) that seems to accord with comments and allusions you make to your experience then.
Your thoughts on Ono seem to gel with mine -- she was placed an agent of control, but there was some strange kind of love between the two despite the circumstancs that brought them together.