|
|
Post by abbey on May 31, 2005 21:03:47 GMT
I just had a brilliant thought: When there are photos and we can't tell if it's Bill or Paul why not just call it "Pill"?
|
|
|
|
Post by ReallyReallyDead on May 31, 2005 21:48:44 GMT
are there any? ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on May 31, 2005 23:16:01 GMT
There is no "Pill".
And there is no photo where I can't tell.
Even doctored.
|
|
|
|
Post by peoplescommittee on Jun 1, 2005 1:04:46 GMT
Well, you're one to brag, aren't you? >:-( Sister Mary was just suggesting something for people who come onto the boards, know how to compare, but aren't that sure about certain photos. Next time, read before you respond.
|
|
TheDZ
Provocative Operator 
Posts: 435
|
Post by TheDZ on Jun 4, 2005 18:55:00 GMT
There is no "Pill". And there is no photo where I can't tell. Even doctored. Agreed and..same here.  What's up, Grumpypants?  |
|
|
|
Post by peoplescommittee on Jun 4, 2005 19:13:21 GMT
I'm sorry, BP is acting like a snob to people who aren't as sure about photo comps and want to be able to do them themselves. Is it so hard to allow a little leeway (aka "Pill") for them? And don't give me BS about he can do them better, people need to learn self-reliance in cases like this.
|
|
TheDZ
Provocative Operator
Posts: 435
|
Post by TheDZ on Jun 5, 2005 1:21:03 GMT
I'm sorry, BP is acting like a snob to people who aren't as sure about photo comps and want to be able to do them themselves. Is it so hard to allow a little leeway (aka "Pill") for them? And don't give me BS about he can do them better, people need to learn self-reliance in cases like this. Red Pill or Blue? or are you still undecided? still smarting from this one...?  No offense, but I don't see a difference. I see him in makeup in the earlier picture, grinning no less. The second, you can't tell if there's makeup and he has less of a grin, not to mention that by my measurements, it's certainly at a different angle with different lighting. There is no comparison because the photos aren't similar enough to judge. Close your mouth then you will see your head growing like a balloon because the air inside. I know BP is correct, but not because he says that he is.... He's right because he speaks the truth. You people should be far more appreciative of the work done here by SunKing and BeatlePaul . So much time spent for free, only to be harassed by politically correct politeniks. No wonder the replies are short and to the point.... Spend more time, then you will see who's who. Then, you might understand what's actually going on. Right now, your posts seem inflammatory and directed at BP personally. If I was him I might not be so patient... such a tolerant moderator...   Paul----------------------------------------Boogaloo Bill Two different people. End of Story. If you don't see it , only time can help you... |
|
|
|
Post by LovelyJulia on Jun 5, 2005 4:14:54 GMT
DeZ the only thing I don't understand about that fade in your post is that Faul's head is supposed to be bigger. Why is it that Paul's head is so much larger?  |
|
|
|
Post by Perplexed on Jun 5, 2005 5:12:01 GMT
They were able to find two people with very similar "casts to the eye". The jawline, ear placement, nose tip, nost length, cheek fullness, mandible width and depth are very different between those two photos. In my opinion.
The eyes seem to be set in a very comparable way. Maybe that's a wrong perception I am having. Little things can get me off track sometimes.
|
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Jun 5, 2005 6:00:53 GMT
Thanks, guys. BP your efforts are truly appreciated and your work is fantastic. However, we keep attracting new people, which we want to do to spread the word, and it is often hard to tell the difference when you first get on the subject. Even more so when looking at the doctored photos.
The "Pill" comment was made in fun for those who are trying very hard to see the evidence you are presenting and to differentiale between Bill/Paul. Pill are the ones that started as Paul and became Bill.
We want to keep the newcomers and encourage their insight and thoughts.......help them to understand.
|
|
|
|
Post by peoplescommittee on Jun 5, 2005 18:18:03 GMT
SunKing and BeatlePaul? I'm sorry if no one else agrees or if anyone who disagrees with me is still here in disguise, but having read their posts, the writing style and the broken English just match up. There is no way they aren't the same person. Why can't we just admit this to ourselves and get on with things? Starting over again as BP rather than being swamped in authority as SK is no crime. There's no need to lie about wanting a fresh start.
|
|
|
|
Post by defhermit on Jun 5, 2005 20:11:02 GMT
I've never spent the time to read BP's and Sunking's posts side by side to try to determine if they were the same person. I don't have the time for that.
What I HAVE noticed is every time someone brings up the possibility that BP IS Sunking, BP nevert comments to disprove that notion. Because of this I've generally assumed that it was correct and they were the same person.
So, Beatlepaul? Are you Sunking?
|
|
|
|
Post by beatled on Jun 6, 2005 2:00:40 GMT
I find it's useful to cultivate a nice who gives a sh** attitude in these situations.. Trust me, you'll feel much better..
|
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Jun 6, 2005 13:59:03 GMT
JoJo, I couldn't agree more! The important part of this forum is getting the news out about Paul's murder and replacement and the investigation, not rather person A used to be person B; unless we are talking about Faul/Bill/Pau/Pill
|
|
|
|
Post by defhermit on Jun 6, 2005 16:38:39 GMT
That's totally what I meant by I don't have time for that. The only thing that makes me curious is that he never bothers to say yes or no.
|
|
