|
|
Post by mike on Aug 26, 2003 22:02:26 GMT
I was wondering what you all think of Faul. I know, he can never be Paul, and this whole 60IF thing should end with him setting the record straight. I think of him as his own person, not the new Paul. I think Faul is confused. I think he looked up to Paul, and couldn't pass up a chance to be like his idol. I mean all of us would like to rock out with the Beatles. I think he didn't know what he was getting into with the whole Faul thing. Wasn't he supposed to be a short-term replacement, but ended up a Beatle for the long term? I think he's ok. I don't like how he tries to be someone he's not, but he did a good job being Paul, and a Beatle. I mean look at all the people who totally believe Paul is alive.
|
|
|
|
Post by Forum Manager on Aug 27, 2003 16:21:46 GMT
i am glad that he kept the beatles alive, letting them continue making great songs. so i am thankful for that. but he never will be the real paul mccartney.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rojopa on Aug 27, 2003 21:22:55 GMT
But, let's admit it. Faul is not Paul, he never was and never can be. What he has written and will write will never be of the caliber that Paul McCartney has done.
We know that Faul is an imposter and just knowing that is what really matters.
We are not decieved anymore. Our eyes are open to the truth! I will never buy another Faul album and will only look at him with contempt.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rojopa on Aug 27, 2003 21:33:11 GMT
And perhaps we should all have a Faul Cd burning to send a message to him. But then again, maybe the cd's will come in handy someday....like propping up a table leg, putting underneath a glass on a table, throwing the cd out and using the cover for another cd. Maybe one day I will have the opportunity to throw all his cd's into his grave so they will be buried with him. That will be closure for me.  |
|
|
|
Post by pennylane on Aug 27, 2003 21:38:45 GMT
boy can you say lynchmob?  i personally like Fauls music but thats not the issue here. the only thing that matters at all is the truth. the truth will set you free  |
|
|
|
Post by Rojopa on Aug 27, 2003 21:56:13 GMT
I know his music is not the issue. But, it was because I believed that he was Paul McCartney, I bought his cd's.
Shouldn't those of us who did have some recourse?
|
|
|
|
Post by LordChinfist on Aug 27, 2003 23:13:57 GMT
Other than the "notion" (I'm not ready to say it's a fact yet) that Faul replaced Paul and it has been kept hush hush, I'm not a Faul fan simply because just about all of his solo material is bad, at least in my opinion. The only post-Beatle song I like by him his Maybe I'm Amazed, and possibly Live and Let Die and Admiral Hulsey. I don't like the rest of it. I don't even like Band on the Run. Surely someone with Paul's talent should have come out with much better music.
|
|
|
|
Post by Forum Manager on Aug 28, 2003 0:41:31 GMT
see? thats our point! how could someone go from from writing beautiful songs like yesterday, to writing crap? makes you think, even if you are skeptical. |
|
|
|
Post by Eggman on Aug 28, 2003 21:46:19 GMT
Oh yes!! He's the great pretender...uh uh...uh uh.... ;D But I love some of his songs!!!! |
|
|
|
Post by PaulBearer on Aug 29, 2003 5:54:08 GMT
What about using the CDs as frisbees Rajopa? You forgot that one! ;D |
|
