new here just a couple of questions......

[crystalgaze]

hi all

I've read the 60IF document and other PID pages with great interest. I'm not entirely sure what my take on this is at the moment, however I can see you are all passionate about this topic . I'm not here to flame anyone I am just interested in getting to the truth of the matter and settling questions about this in my own mind, and observing the opinions of the board members.

I do have a couple of questions at the moment though which I would like to ask


1) many people have talked about the " heirs" of James Paul. I wondered who you would consider those to be? The current next generation McCartney's, by the reasoning and argument on this board would be " Faul's" children and not true McCartney heirs. James Paul, to my knowledge , had no children with Jane Asher ....... and if 60IF is proven to be true and this did happen what do you think the effect on them would be? Given their entire existance would be turned upside down and their identity shattered.......... I would be interested in people's thoughts on this

and


2) Has anyone thought of or tried to approach Astrid , Stu Sutcliff's girlfriend, and ask her about this? She was the one who made them moptops after all and would probably still have an extensive collection of early and genuine James Paul shots and negatives in her collection. Possibly she would be able to give an opinion as to wether he is a different person or not.

looking foreward to hearing your opinions and answers

The Crystal Gaze

[lisatwirler]

Id like to make two comments in reply:
1. Fauls kids may know about the scam. They could have
been told anything to cover up. Fauls kids may not know
in which case they might react with shame, humiliation,
anger, loss of self esteem or symptom of psych trauma if
they are sensitive to the fact that there dad isnt the real
Paul. ( I wonder if this is one reason many people keep
quiet about the switch-to protect the kids. Is this why
George remained silent in the face of death ? )
However, Faul's kids or heirs would not lose the right
to inherit from Faul. Faul's money does belong to Faul. I think
this is why there was a change in the Beatles name; at least
there must have been some arrangement where Pauls money
from the early Beatles went to the real Paul's estate while
Faul's earnings went to Faul. )
2. I always wonder about people like Astrid because if she
had knowledge of the switch, and she shold be able to tell the
diff, why wouldnt she come forward and talk about it? My point
is that they can kill Stu but they cant kill everyone. Maybe she
is intimidated by Stu's mysterious death. Maybe thats why we
dont see photo's identified as from her collection--because she
is afraid to even publish them. I wonder if there are photos
around - maybe in the newspapers or magazines--that have
not been retouched. I suppose that some one like Astrid could
just be hynotized by the tendency for people to think that
strange things dont happen. But I do wonder why no one
outside the inner circle of the Beatles ever seems to confirm
the possibility that the clues tell a real story. You can argue that
the clues tell a real story and you can imagine reasons why
the Beatles might have presented the facts of the story to
people through clues rather than in an explicit narrative or
documentary, but how come no one in the circle of the Beatles
or tangential to the circle--some one close or close to someone
close, never said anything to suggest the clues are an
account of real events. Compare this to the Kennedy
Assassination for example, Oswald is dead and Marina was
initially intimidated byt the FBI/CIA, but Oswald's mother and
brother doubted the official story and said so, friends of Oswald
and Marina gave accounts contrary to the official story even
though witnesses who gave contrary accounts were apparently
dying, and Marina herself eventually supported the conspiracy
view. How come not one person -not one janitor-hairdresser
--recording engineer--friend of a friend ever said you know what
I dont think that is McCartney?

[Forum Manager]

about the children. there was one woman who claimed that paul had fathered her child. so they did DNA tests, which of course preved negative. the reason is becuase they tested faul's DNA, not paul's

[PaulBearer]

The little girl in MMT, Nicola, may be Paul's secret daughter!

[Imgonnaopenmymind]

Key terms here are "may be." I think it's a bit of a jump in logic.

Anyway, welcome to the forums and I hope you enjoy your time here.