I don't understand how Paul is dead.....Seriously

[mrsmccartney]

???how is paul dead? I think he may not be dead. If hi is dead I don't think his family will alow there to be a Faul. And wouldn't it be in the news if someone found out?? They didn't hid Johns death . Or Georges death ... Why did they hide pauls then? I know all these clues are making us think that he's dead, but how bout if it's not. I was also thinking maybe the beatles thought it was hilarious that every one thought paul was dead and thought they should act along as a joke and let everyone else think it is real. But I did see alot of evidence to make me think that he was dead...but I was thinking and I guess maybe it was fake....But you guys need to convince me that I am wrong.

[SunKing]

MrsMcCartney?-!-?

So Heather:

[glow=red,2,300]WELCOME!!![/glow]

BTW Greetings to Bill....

[pennylane]

welcome MrsMcCartney
i think its important to try to read as many posts as you can then ask questions about anything you still don't understand. Most of the anwers can be found on the web sites or on this forum.

[byrdsmaniac]

Heather (haha ;D),
Songs like "Dig It" on the Let It Be album make no sense unless Paul was dead. One can't argue for that song musically. If it was just John being goofy the producer would probably have said that it wasn't good enough to be put on an album. Then think about all the songs that relate to the death. Virtually every song on the white album and Abbey Road. If it was just a ruse I don't think they would have been so obsessed about it.
I agree with Spanky; the circumstantial evidence on this site and the linked ones is so overwhelming that even if Paul is alive, he'd have a tough time convincing me.

[TheeCavendeshLane]

I think you have to look at this web site as a call for people to
come forward, those that are witnesses and that have information
which by itself may mean a little but with analysis and taken together
with the testimony of others might reveal the truth of the matter;
and you have to look at this site at a place where the hope is that
speculation and experimentation and analysis might lead to the
truth of the matter or to an official investigation into the truth
of the matter where the principles are asked to come forth and tell
what they know. Secondly, you admit that there are clues and
that the clues are a kind of mystery, its just that you want to call
the clues a kind of inside joke; I dont think its a joke simply because
of the time and effort that apparently went into developing and
perpetuating the mystery. Imagine that John said the album
'Imagine' is a joke. You cant because it was his work. Imagine
John said 'Double Fantasy' is a joke and a hoax--again its hard to
imagine because if Lennon said that you would have to ultimately say
that he is very coomplex and very eccentric and a real artist to
conceive of doing albums about the imaginary and fantastical lives
of John and Yoko as if their real lives were a sort of Ruttles spoof
documentary. The clues are at least a part of a substantial work
of art and are not a mockery of Beatles fans. Last I challenge
you to come up with a coherent explanation for the existance of
the clues--not just the clues but the clues and the apparent
interruption in the continued existance of Paul McCartney, the clues
and the non-clue evidence--the changes in appearance and the
changes in his musical style ( from exciting music to trash ) and
the change in his voice, the change in his personality from a
charming and witty, brash young man to the personality of a
witless dolt--Yes George changed from a guy who liked fast cars
to a guy who spent his time incontemplation of God and Life and
yes that is a big change but he didnt become a witless dolt. You
know if you look around you will see a lot of photgraphic evidence--
if not evidence think of the photos you see as demonstrations to think
about--You can say people are choosing photos where Paul happens
to look different due to the photographic angle or some such
reason that you might call tricks of light and shadow--but really
the photographs used arent obscure photographs--bad shots-
unflattering angles chosen by Sun King--the photo's used are the
ones they chose -for the most part-to include as part of album
art design. Were they deliberately choosing photos and seeking
out angles where Paul wouldnt look like Paul? There is something funny about the whole business and no one is going to be asked
or feel the pressure to come forward without the interest of the
people who ask the questions you are asking here. enjoy the show.

[beldabeast]

Hi,
I hope you folks don't mind a little of my playing the devil's advocate here !
What I like about this board is it is'nt like those political opinion boards I am getting so sick of.
I think everyone here wants the truth . Is Paul dead ?
It's a yes or no question !


Recently Faul or Paul switched billing on the songwriting credits from lennon- McCartney to McCartney-Lennon .

If he was a fake , why would he do that ? Why provoke Yoko the dragon lady ? She howled a bit about it.

[Eggman]

Because he's an arrogant!!!!

Please read why the other Beatles were so angry with him and you will have the answer!!!

[Forum Manager]

as for y they didnt cover up john and george's death:

1) they were the ones who killed them in the first place
2) the beatles were already over