Post by ElementryPenguin on Sept 7, 2003 11:11:54 GMT
Right, just to prove you all wrong, I have spent the last four hours carefully watching some of my Beatles anthology. Here's what I found. You say Paul's eyes turned green, when he became Faul, after 1966. In the song Paperback Writer, (1966), it is still the real Paul, yet on closer examination of the video clip, guess what colour his eyes are? Green!! And then the rain video clip (still the real Paul), green eyes again! In the Lady Madonna clip, however, his eyes appear brown, but isn't that supposed to be green eyed Faul? All I can say to this is, you can't prove that Faul ever existed based on Paul's eye colour, because it changes between brown and green depending on the light (and yes it is possible). So your theory of the real Paul having brown eyes and Faul having green doesn't work.
Another thing was that in the Paperback Writer video clip, Paul had a very obvious chipped tooth and swollen lip, note the fact that this is the real Paul I'm talking about here. Now, later on, in when he sings "Hey Jude" (it's after 1966 so you all think he's Faul) the tooth has been fixed but the lip (if you look very closely) is still slightly puffy on the inside when he opens his mouth -obviously a scar from when he lost the tooth. But hang on a minute, didn't Paul lose the tooth and hurt his lip? How come Faul bears the scar of this? Because there is no Faul!
Another thing that I noted was the way that Paul dances in his early days, he always taps his LEFT foot to the beat and shakes his head cheesily as he sings, in a very goofy but very cute way. The way he dances is very very unique, totally different to John, totally different to George. It's hard to explain but the expression on his face is also very unique and would be very hard to imitate. In noted him doing this in songs such as "twist and shout" and "please please me" - very definitely Paul. Now I compare this to the video of Hello, Goodbye (supposively Faul) and see that Paul is dancing in exactly the same way, shaking his cute head, tapping his LEFT foot, dancing in his unique way. The man in Hello, Goodbye is definitely Paul. Everything about him screams Paul. I don't care what anyone else says, the way he moves in "twist and shout" and "hello goodbye" are exactly the same. Exactly.
Another thing I noted was his face shape. Now photos can be altered and stretched and airbrushed to look unreal - this probably happened to the photo of Paul in sgt. Pepper for example, it doesn't look like him at all. He looks like a wax model in that photo, due to it being tampered with. Video, however, doesn't lie. I watched very very very carefully and found that his face shape, profile, chin, everything, stayed the same. The only thing that changed was that he aged a lot as time went by and that he kept changing his hair, facial hair etc - changing your hair can make your face appear a different shape, it's an optical illusion - so can facial hair. Weight loss can also cause the face shape to change slightly, and Paul did lose a bit of weight as he got older, which also contributed to his appearance changing slightly. Overall though, he stayed the same. His personality also stayed the same in all of the interviews and his speaking voice when he was 50 was exactly the same as his speaking voice when he was in his 20's.
The way he and John fooled around and reacted towards each other also stayed the same. Paul was Paul, the whole way through. And he still is Paul. There is no Faul.
Another thing I noted was his ear shape. His ear shape when he was 15 was the same as his ear shape when he was 20, which was the same as his ear shape when he was 50. Exactly the same. People's ears are always slightly different, and surgery can't alter ear shape that drastically. These ears have never changed. They belong to one person and one person only. That person is Paul.
Lastly, the anthology has a lot of Paul when he's old speaking and reflecting on the past. He is telling the Beatles story through his eyes. Most of the story, ie Anthology 1,2,3,4 and 5 are all from the time before 1966. Faul never knew this time, because he wasn't there. So if Faul does exist, how does he know all this stuff? Did the other Beatles tell him? I don't think so. He explains about his family and about things that the other Beatles aren't likely to know and some of the memories he recalls are really specific, ones only HE would know. So it can't be Faul, retelling the story because he wasn't there and he didn't know those things. The story of Faul is very very absurd and I can't believe people actually believe it. Paul is Paul and he never died, there's no doubt about it.
Another thing was that in the Paperback Writer video clip, Paul had a very obvious chipped tooth and swollen lip, note the fact that this is the real Paul I'm talking about here. Now, later on, in when he sings "Hey Jude" (it's after 1966 so you all think he's Faul) the tooth has been fixed but the lip (if you look very closely) is still slightly puffy on the inside when he opens his mouth -obviously a scar from when he lost the tooth. But hang on a minute, didn't Paul lose the tooth and hurt his lip? How come Faul bears the scar of this? Because there is no Faul!
Another thing that I noted was the way that Paul dances in his early days, he always taps his LEFT foot to the beat and shakes his head cheesily as he sings, in a very goofy but very cute way. The way he dances is very very unique, totally different to John, totally different to George. It's hard to explain but the expression on his face is also very unique and would be very hard to imitate. In noted him doing this in songs such as "twist and shout" and "please please me" - very definitely Paul. Now I compare this to the video of Hello, Goodbye (supposively Faul) and see that Paul is dancing in exactly the same way, shaking his cute head, tapping his LEFT foot, dancing in his unique way. The man in Hello, Goodbye is definitely Paul. Everything about him screams Paul. I don't care what anyone else says, the way he moves in "twist and shout" and "hello goodbye" are exactly the same. Exactly.
Another thing I noted was his face shape. Now photos can be altered and stretched and airbrushed to look unreal - this probably happened to the photo of Paul in sgt. Pepper for example, it doesn't look like him at all. He looks like a wax model in that photo, due to it being tampered with. Video, however, doesn't lie. I watched very very very carefully and found that his face shape, profile, chin, everything, stayed the same. The only thing that changed was that he aged a lot as time went by and that he kept changing his hair, facial hair etc - changing your hair can make your face appear a different shape, it's an optical illusion - so can facial hair. Weight loss can also cause the face shape to change slightly, and Paul did lose a bit of weight as he got older, which also contributed to his appearance changing slightly. Overall though, he stayed the same. His personality also stayed the same in all of the interviews and his speaking voice when he was 50 was exactly the same as his speaking voice when he was in his 20's.
The way he and John fooled around and reacted towards each other also stayed the same. Paul was Paul, the whole way through. And he still is Paul. There is no Faul.
Another thing I noted was his ear shape. His ear shape when he was 15 was the same as his ear shape when he was 20, which was the same as his ear shape when he was 50. Exactly the same. People's ears are always slightly different, and surgery can't alter ear shape that drastically. These ears have never changed. They belong to one person and one person only. That person is Paul.
Lastly, the anthology has a lot of Paul when he's old speaking and reflecting on the past. He is telling the Beatles story through his eyes. Most of the story, ie Anthology 1,2,3,4 and 5 are all from the time before 1966. Faul never knew this time, because he wasn't there. So if Faul does exist, how does he know all this stuff? Did the other Beatles tell him? I don't think so. He explains about his family and about things that the other Beatles aren't likely to know and some of the memories he recalls are really specific, ones only HE would know. So it can't be Faul, retelling the story because he wasn't there and he didn't know those things. The story of Faul is very very absurd and I can't believe people actually believe it. Paul is Paul and he never died, there's no doubt about it.
