|
Post by IanSingleton777 on Sept 8, 2003 23:41:55 GMT
Hello everyone!
Was thumbing through the massive Anthology book today, and found some interesting visuals which mostly support the Paul is dead/replaced by Faul hypothesis.
I shall now relate page numbers, but will refrain from any commentary of depth so as to not taint your critical evaluations.
Page 195 -- Excellent snap of the band in the massive Abby Road Studio B. Note Paul's height in relation to whom he is standing with. This is the real Paul in the photo.
Page 201 -- Paul & George. 1966...note heights of both in relation to eachother; then compare to Sgt. Pepper era photos for height reference.
Page 256 -- Faul, George, and Ringo. 1967
Page 278 -- Hello/Goodbye shots.
Page 279 -- notable for Faul's too obvious slouching. Mustn't stand straight up, eh?
Pages 294/295 Beatles final photo session. Infamous now as the end of the proverbial road. Noted here as an exercise of critical positioning of the guys; and angles of camera utilization. Hmmm... interesting!
Your intelligent comments are most welcome! -world peace now; -Ian
|
|
|
Post by Darkhorse on Sept 9, 2003 0:21:11 GMT
VERY good observations Ian. Eventhough the Anthology has almost all 'clues' disguised on purpose, you can still pick up on some they couldn't cover up.
I don't know what page it is on but there is one of Paul and George standing next to each other and you can see their feet too. There is no mistaking Paul's height in that picture. He is the same height as George.
|
|
|
Post by IanSingleton777 on Sept 9, 2003 20:51:45 GMT
Yes, that would be page 195 in the book; george and paul standing at the mike singing together; a candid shot in the innser sanctum of the Beatle Universe (EMI studios!) and Paul & George are the EXACT same height.
Which helps reinforce what we already knew; George, Paul, and John were all very close to the exact same height.
Yes, discrepency clues may have been altered, but the ones they missed were the simple 1966 and before ones; which provide just as obvious clues when compared to height/head shape/nose/eye positioning pics from 1967 onwards.
|
|