|
|
Post by beldabeast on Sept 19, 2003 15:27:51 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by PaulBearer on Sept 19, 2003 16:17:09 GMT
Perhaps he hadn't had his boolutine injections so didn't want to be photographed?
|
|
|
|
Post by beldabeast on Sept 19, 2003 16:36:03 GMT
Perhaps he hadn't had his boolutine injections so didn't want to be photographed? That is what im thinking ! |
|
|
|
Post by OceanChild on Sept 19, 2003 17:36:43 GMT
Here is the story from the paper whose photographer was punched by Faul's people. The actual newspaper article, which I just bought, says more: When Standard photographer Kevin Wheal tried to take a picture, billys' companions stepped in and grabbed his arms and camera, witnesses said. "You can't take a picture of him tonight, so back off, " one of billy's companions said. "Let me take just one and I'll go, " said Wheal/ billy then went up to Wheal and shouthed:Listen mate, I've come to see this stupid c*nt and you are not going to take a picture of me tonight." [...] Vaseem Adnan, 32, went up to billy and said: Mr. McCartney, I am a member of the public, can I shake your hand?" billy replied: "F*ck off. I am not shaking your hand. I am a pedestrian on a private visit." Mr. Adnan was left stunned. He said:"I feel insulted and belittled. That was out of order. I feel aggrieved, I've lost respect for him. He is an extremely cheap man for doing this." [...] (The photographer) Wheal said:"I feel outraged, I had more respect for Paul, he's a man of such legendary status... That sort of behaviou is not acceptable. I was only doing my job. I did ask politely if I could take a photograph. But he told me to f*ck off."
|
|
|
|
Post by LUCY on Sept 19, 2003 22:45:36 GMT
Chill out. all you need is ....... a soup spoon.
|
|
|
|
Post by Forum Manager on Sept 19, 2003 22:57:09 GMT
"Reports that this was a fracas or anything other than a group of friends on a night out are heavily exaggerated."
sound familiar?
|
|
|
|
Post by TheWatusi on Sept 20, 2003 0:53:31 GMT
i noticed that Exact same thing, 9....
|
|
|
|
Post by PaulBearer on Sept 20, 2003 7:05:23 GMT
It sounds like Faul's starting to get paranoid - maybe with the stress of 60IF exposing him, he's beginning to crack up!  |
|
ivory
Contributor
Meter Maid
Posts: 75
|
Post by ivory on Sept 20, 2003 7:10:13 GMT
I personaly thought Faul was a little better of a person. geeze how rude.
|
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Sept 21, 2003 14:44:29 GMT
i say that it seems he's aware of everything that's been said on this site. knowing what we know and trying what we're trying to do, if i were him i would not let anyone touch me. it's been said aloud that we're planning to do DNA tests, then whoever touches him could hold a pin and cut his hand, then use the blood to do DNA tests... just my thoughts.... maybe that's why faul's being so "untouchable" lately. he doesn't alow not professional close up photographs, he doesn't let a simple man to hold his hand... WEIRD. but again, if he's aware of this site, which i believe true, he's just going ahead of everything we think. : [glow=red,2,300]PERFECT![/glow] My "sources" told me the reason why: It was because of that "our" image sequence: ...animation loading...please wait...     |
|
|
|
Post by TheWatusi on Sept 21, 2003 15:13:43 GMT
oh, sunking....youre so kind to us!!  |
|
|
|
Post by MrMustard on Sept 22, 2003 9:22:00 GMT
I hate the way Faul is giving Paul such a bad name by appearing so pathetic - being rude to fans that love him and refusing to have his picture taken. The real Paul would never have such unacceptable behaviour, Faul ought to be ashamed of himself. But then again, 60if is clearly having a major effect on him - keep it up guys! ;D ;D ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by TheeCavendeshLane on Sept 23, 2003 5:32:21 GMT
its not him--of course he cant allow that many pictures that close up--something is bound to show
|
|
|
|
Post by MrMustard on Sept 23, 2003 11:54:12 GMT
Very true!  |
|
|
|
Post by beldabeast on Sept 23, 2003 13:06:23 GMT
Looking at the above animations .
If that IS him he needs to start eating meat !
The looks 50 years older than the Young James Paul pictured there.
|
|
|
|
Post by MrMustard on Sept 23, 2003 13:33:27 GMT
I know, he looks about 70 - or older.... how old was Billy Sheppard? I'm guessing he was older than Paul because he just looks so old! ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by beldabeast on Sept 26, 2003 16:56:44 GMT
I know, he looks about 70 - or older.... how old was Billy Sheppard? I'm guessing he was older than Paul because he just looks so old! ;D The way I hear tell of it , he was 10 years older than paul. I was a pre-teen when the Beatles came to the USA . There was a 3 year time lapse after the date of the alledged death and the breaking of the story . In the meantime they stopped touring , and released ANIMATED films rather than in person ( CLUE ! ) and grew beards and started wearing wacky get-ups , etc. In those 3 years the unretouched photo's in the mags were lost destroyed or thrown out , for the most part . When the story broke , we had "forgotten " Paul. 3 years is forever to a 13 to 16 year olds . By that time a full stable of competing bands had emerged that largely replaced the Beatles to me. I was highly disenchanted with the "new " Beatles with their "weird" new image and their surly demeanors The sub-culture ( hippies . shoulder length hair , ridiculous apparel , drugs , etc ) - was a CIA-Tavistock invention to begin with . I did'nt understand that at the time of course ! I figured the Beatles started the whole thing , which meant in order to be fashionable I had to provoke my parents by affecting manners and dress I thought sucked in the first place . The real Beatles , to me , were about exhuberance and happy times . " Thank You Girl " is a perfect embodiment of that original Beatles spirit. I guess you had to have been there to understand. The 4 guys with hair combed down over their foreheads , wearing jackets and ties one could slide past mom and dad . Somehow , all that suddenly morphed beyond the Beatles to street riots , hard and highly toxic and dangerous drugs . People being beaten or trampled to death at concerts ( have you noticed how to this very day people still behave at rock concerts as though they have never been anywhere before ? ) Collectively we seemed to embrace it. As individuals , I don't think anyone was really on board with it . It is a real bummer to know that I blamed the Beatles for what a third party sponsored , most certainly against their wishes . What kind of mis-antrophic mean spirited bunch of low down son-of -a -bitches must our leaders be to put sub-liminal drug messages in childrens music ? And a 18 year old , in their natural state , IS a child. It was thought back then that the nations children was mounting a attack on the nation, when in fact , the goverment mounted a attack on the nations children . This must be exposed . I want to pull down that whole goverment -mass media - mind control - witchery the corporate -shadow goverment has the people under. If the public learns what happened to James Paul it would snap them out of that reverie the goverment spooks have them under. |
|
|
|
Post by xpt626 on Sept 26, 2003 19:50:55 GMT
In the meantime they stopped touring....released ANIMATED films rather than in person (CLUE !)..... yes, and "voice actors" played the parts of all the Beatles in that film....  |
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Sept 27, 2003 15:27:27 GMT
...and Faul said: 'It's not your fault, it's our publicity guy's fault.Just reading it here |
|
|
|
Post by xpt626 on Sept 27, 2003 17:20:15 GMT
...and Faul said: 'It's not your fault, it's our publicity guy's fault. oh, certainly, it's the publicity guy's fault that Faul forgot his manners and behaved badly.....  |
|
|
|
Post by AlexTheLrg on Sept 27, 2003 18:33:47 GMT
It's always the flunky's fault.
|
|
|
|
Post by Scatterdome on Oct 3, 2003 0:12:56 GMT
The sub-culture ( hippies . shoulder length hair , ridiculous apparel , drugs , etc ) - was a CIA-Tavistock invention to begin with. I don't mean to start a tangent, but I disagree with the idea that the counterculture was something that the Illuminati, eternal purveyors of mainstream culture, wanted to happen. "Counterculture" means a culture that is counter to mainstream culture. While the CIA may have originally tried to use LSD on people as mind control, they quickly aborted that tack when they realized it actually created a strong sub-culture that is far more questioning of authority and of traditional ways. As John Lennon commented in his 1980 Playboy interview: "we must remember to THANK the U.S. Army and CIA for developing LSD. They thought they were making something to CONTROL us, but they made something that FREED our minds instead..." I think the Beatles may have started out as the Illuminati's favorite band, with their first six albums consisting almost entirely of male-female relationship songs. (The Illuminati's favorite function of mainstream radio: "Marry and reproduce immediately! Marry and reproduce immediately! Marry and reproduce immediately! Keep them babies comin'!") But when the Beatles suddenly got trippy on everybody with Revolver, and writing lyrics about many OTHER things, they suddenly became the Illuminati's enemies at the peak of their popularity. The Illuminati knew that killing the Beatles at this point in time would cause more harm than good to the Illuminati agenda (see my earlier post on martyrdom, on my thread "The Beatles > James Paul McCartney > Paul hired a replacement in '66..."), and so they had to use alternate methods to keep the situation under control. The numerous difficulties experienced by the Beatles on their last tour coinciding with the recording and release of “Revolver” are a strong indication that the Illuminati were now trying to throw a wrench in their works. The following is a quote from George Harrison about the last Beatles tour, taken from the modern-day interview shown in the “Beatles Anthology” videos (1996.) (When viewing this quote in the video, note how Faul attempts to interrupt him several times.) “We said all those things that happened, like people threatening Ringo, or threatening us, or saying the plane was going to crash, hurricanes hitting, race riots, student riots- there was always something that we pulled into town… there was always some big thing going on and we’d come into the middle of it, this mania, and it’d just be like chaos. So it was just becoming too difficult on the nervous system- that’s what I thought.” More people tried to expand their mind with hallucinogens (and I'm only talking about hallucinogens, not icky drugs like heroin and cocaine) because of the Beatles than any other band, because the whole world saw their music transform into something deeper and more revolutionary when everybody knew they had started to experiment with LSD. |
|
