|
Faul?
Oct 13, 2003 19:19:24 GMT
Post by SgtPepper on Oct 13, 2003 19:19:24 GMT
What's all this stuff about calling me Faul? Yeah, John would call me that when he was upset at me - Sgt. Pepper when he was being nice (note I said "being" - I left the Beatles with the distinct impression that he certainly was not this way by nature). I had to put up with all that crap for 3 or 4 years - isn't easy being Sgt. Pepper...but that isn't a license for any old guy or gal to call me that. Yet he who laughs last, laughs best
|
|
|
Faul?
Oct 14, 2003 4:05:53 GMT
Post by byrdsmaniac on Oct 14, 2003 4:05:53 GMT
What's all this stuff about calling me Faul? Yeah, John would call me that when he was upset at me - Sgt. Pepper when he was being nice (note I said "being" - I left the Beatles with the distinct impression that he certainly was not this way by nature). I had to put up with all that crap for 3 or 4 years - isn't easy being Sgt. Pepper...but that isn't a license for any old guy or gal to call me that. Yet he who laughs last, laughs best Sorry "Faul", but the lingo here is all USA, not English or Canadian. In other words, if you were truly Faul you would have phrased this differently. Don't believe you're who you say you are. (What else is new, eh?)
|
|
|
Faul?
Oct 14, 2003 5:25:06 GMT
Post by SgtPepper on Oct 14, 2003 5:25:06 GMT
And all the people back here in the USA say sound like I am from Canada Never been to Ontario, eh?
|
|
|
Faul?
Oct 14, 2003 7:24:48 GMT
Post by JamesPaul & Brian on Oct 14, 2003 7:24:48 GMT
What's all this stuff about calling me Faul? Because unfortunately you are STILL my impersonator. Was I so silly?
|
|
|
Faul?
Oct 20, 2003 21:17:42 GMT
Post by SgtPepper on Oct 20, 2003 21:17:42 GMT
You're doing the same I am, mate.
|
|
|
Faul?
Oct 20, 2003 21:21:53 GMT
Post by SgtPepper on Oct 20, 2003 21:21:53 GMT
Though, yes you were silly - but not as much so as my love songs
|
|
|
Faul?
Oct 20, 2003 21:22:21 GMT
Post by JamesPaul & Brian on Oct 20, 2003 21:22:21 GMT
You're doing the same I am, mate. Ah, that's good, Bill! ;D
|
|
|
Faul?
Oct 21, 2003 1:04:27 GMT
Post by unrepentant on Oct 21, 2003 1:04:27 GMT
this is getting to be like an asylum. we have 2 guys who are NOT paul McCartney; one is pretending to be paul. the OTHER is pretending to be paul PRETENDING to be paul (are you with me so far?). they are both pretending that they are pretending, yet neither one *SOUND OF NEEDLE SCRATCHING ACROSS RECORD*
how far can a board devoted to truth and justice foster so much.....silliness?
|
|
|
Faul?
Oct 21, 2003 1:33:06 GMT
Post by eyesbleed on Oct 21, 2003 1:33:06 GMT
how far can a board devoted to truth and justice foster so much.....silliness? Ya, but a little silliness doesn't hurt anybody.! I'm constantly amazed at all the little tid-bits of info & massive amount of interesting pics folks around here seem to have access to. I'm sure there's plenty of mysterious beings cruisin' thru here anyway....... so to me, it justs adds to the fun. (I've been addicted to other MB's before, but not quite like this) Why call him Faul? Because it's short & easy & means something specific.... Works for me.
|
|
|
Faul?
Oct 21, 2003 1:36:15 GMT
Post by SgtPepper on Oct 21, 2003 1:36:15 GMT
The truth part I can see. The justice part, I doubt that. I read about a month before I began posting, and though I am pretty much convinced of the truth of the matter being expressed, I see a bunch of attackers waiting to get at "me". So though I don't condone what I did, am a billionaire and have lots of connections, frankly I'm very concerned about what you'd all do to me if this was resolved the wrong way. Things can change. Many people were evidently already hurt because of this. No need for more. Only the people directly responsible for that deserved to be punished for it.
Regarding the identity issue, MANY people are to blame, including of course the 3 other Beatles. Though it's possible, I can't imagine Paul's death not being revealed unless they wanted it that way. I can see strangers doing this, but that's no way to deal with your friend.
|
|
|
Faul?
Oct 21, 2003 1:37:18 GMT
Post by SgtPepper on Oct 21, 2003 1:37:18 GMT
I'm sure there's plenty of mysterious beings cruisin' thru here anyway....... so to me, it justs adds to the fun. Mee too ;D
|
|
|
Faul?
Oct 21, 2003 2:49:37 GMT
Post by Perplexed on Oct 21, 2003 2:49:37 GMT
Well, I share Sgt. Pepper's sentiment in this aspect...........now, I may wax a bit religious here, so , if desired, close this window post haste.
I imagine a lot of people have possibly been hurt along the way. Would it not be tres preferable, mais non, for the tenor of this pursuit to retain a certain, qu'est-ce que c'est, concerned reserve?
If fate, in its time, should prove things out, isn't a mellower, milder, more merciful mien (whoops, sorry about all the 'm's, I couldn't resist) better in the long run?
It's tempting sometimes to wanna kick up some dust and pipe out "Let's nail the B*st*rds!!!" but, I don't think things can ever really happen that way. Who among us is up to doing any real "nailing?"
Not so recently, it was Christ who took the nails.
The present world system goes for a time "as is" with permission. But, I read that it is a fairly time-limited contract at this point. In the end, I trust that the Ultimate Restitutor will make Ultimate Restitutions. After all, legal restitution is always a potential parameter in ANY legal arrangement. And I am not speaking only of earthly contracts---I hint of longer lasting ones.
In human courts, we are summoned before the judge to face the plaintiff.
In the restoration, or the living again of all souls,who all might we be "subpoened" to face? If any that we meet there have a bone to pick with us (tee-hee), might'n we not see those persons first up? That maybe something for all of us to consider, at least in a momentary way, once before we croak. I suspect some people will do rather well, even those who might not have ever felt really religious, or mouthed names and dogma every hour. We may be shocked at where we did well, and where we did poorly. Some of us may need special handling. Some of us may crumble. Some of the simple folks may have a 'good day in court!' Some may wish that they were standing before "Judge Judy."
But my central point is, we all found this for a reason.( I found it accidentally, suddenly. I never believed the rumours at all all those years. I noticed paul's face looking changed a bit at a certain time, but I wrote it off right away to photo distortions and aging and drugs. But, a lot of people age, take drugs, and appear in weird photos and still look like themselves.) Maybe it is just for people here to ponder on these things now. Because for sure, denials by pertinent folks will continue until they decide to change, if ever. And they will protect assets, monetary and otherwise; most of them will protect family, certain families.
Can we enjoy our rapport, and not rile up the lions?
There are many other lions out there to face.
Maybe Androcles had the right idea.
|
|
RZ4
Contributor
Posts: 17
|
Faul?
Oct 24, 2003 5:22:26 GMT
Post by RZ4 on Oct 24, 2003 5:22:26 GMT
Some amateur roleplaying at work here...
|
|