|
|
Post by beldabeast on Dec 1, 2003 13:46:10 GMT
Iwonder if that photo can be dated by the photographic quality . I know that our family pics " look"
different . The 50's photos look different than the 60's
photos . That pic looks like late 50's .
|
|
|
|
Post by yellowmatter on Dec 1, 2003 16:25:24 GMT
Has this photo not been stretched a little?
The face seems longer than the one on the white album poster.
|
|
|
|
Post by JamesPaul & Brian on Dec 1, 2003 17:10:09 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Dec 1, 2003 17:39:27 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Chris on Dec 1, 2003 18:29:50 GMT
:oS.K - that's pretty incredible !!!!
Wow !!!
Love to all...
Chris
|
|
|
|
Post by yellowmatter on Dec 1, 2003 20:59:59 GMT
Cheers LongJohn! I never thought you did do it intentionally - worry not my friend ;D ;D Very convincing, very interesting - thank you so much for posting this - they are undoubtadly the same person. Thanks again (and JamesPaul and SK)  |
|
|
|
Post by TruthUnknown123 on Dec 1, 2003 22:38:21 GMT
there's something about Williams ora that is exactly like Fauls, it has to be that man, or my mind is playing awful tricks on me.  ^ / <> \ / \ ______ |
|
|
|
Post by Fwings on Dec 2, 2003 17:37:31 GMT
I was actually considering doing this the other night, but it looks like you beat me to it.
Yes, it's very telling. There's no way that man is Paul.
|
|
|
|
Post by Darkhorse on Dec 3, 2003 0:55:54 GMT
just for fun, i removed the glasses and mustache of faul's pic from the white album poster.  Great work LJ. It looks like it could be Paul's older brother. |
|
|
|
Post by IanSingleton777 on Dec 3, 2003 16:45:55 GMT
just for fun, i removed the glasses and mustache of faul's pic from the white album poster. scary!! i can't see how people still can say this was paul in disguise! ;D Well, perhaps those people read 'The Love You Make" by Peter Brown, in which Paul is described as having a hobby, during the touring years, of traveling with disguises and walking around the crowds, and even going to Harrison's hotel room door and fooling him. I believe it implicitly describes him "slicking his hair back, and wearing glasses." Of course, it is understood for comparison purposes why you altered the White Album photo, rendering the image sans glasses, but this is just like the retouching and altering that we PID proponents cite as evidence of Faul. We cry "foul!" when we uncover doctored photos, and indeed it makes up 95% of the case evidence proving Faul. Opponents of PID and FAUL can and will use our touching-up of photos to get a desired effect against the cause. I personally don't agree with that tact, but I can put myself in their position. They would have a point. |
|
|
|
Post by Darkhorse on Dec 3, 2003 17:57:56 GMT
i said ****just for fun**** . come on...... It's for the benefit of the members who accept Paul is dead and that that is Billy Sheppard in that picture. If they wanna cry doctored photos then let them. If so, then they don't have the intelligence to discern when a photo is doctored to see more into what an individual looks like compared to doctoring a photo to change the physical dimensions of someone's face(i.e. the recent stretching of Paul photos). |
|
|
|
Post by IanSingleton777 on Dec 3, 2003 19:08:23 GMT
thanks darkhorse. i never came here claiming that was a real pic, of course i said i changed it (removed the glasses and mustache). just to see what would it look like. i said it was the white album pic... i don't understand some things here lately...  Wah.. I do. If you read my post, I stated that I DO NOT AGREE WITH THE TACT that YOU doctoring the photo is any problem, or hypocritical. Get it? I meant I knew why you did it; to illustrate what Bill would look like, NO PROBLEM. But that the opposition could twist it to weaken PID. I merely said, in plain english, that I can see ahead how persons NOT into PID could use it as an argument point. What's the problem? You seem to take some issues (only from me) personally. This board seems to deteriorate somewhat when dealing with contrary perspectives...depending on who's contrary, of course. Alter all the photos you like, "just for fun." Send them to Faul. But if you want to be insulated within some little clique of posters and intolerant of others, again, depending on who they are, then that is your shortcomming - not mine. Sorry my posts aren't fluffy, empty, back-patting syncophant wastes.... some people want just that. |
|
|
|
Post by IanSingleton777 on Dec 3, 2003 19:11:52 GMT
i said ****just for fun**** . come on...... ..and I agreed with what you'd done. come on... |
|
|
|
Post by xpt626 on Dec 4, 2003 0:32:40 GMT
....I can see ahead how persons NOT into PID could use it as an argument point...... persons not "into" PID, as you say, can and will use anything for an argument, whether or not LJ removes glasses / mustache from the White Album photo. I didn't see any bellyaching when someone "painted" a mustache on James Paul in another thread... This board seems to deteriorate somewhat when dealing with contrary perspectives...depending on who's contrary, of course. Alter all the photos you like, "just for fun." Send them to Faul. But if you want to be insulated within some little clique of posters and intolerant of others, again, depending on who they are, then that is your shortcomming - not mine. Sorry my posts aren't fluffy, empty, back-patting syncophant wastes.... some people want just that. YOU are the one coming across as "intolerant" and having an attitude problem, and it's not just with LongJohn. You have a habit of "talking down" to people, and use no manners or common courtesy whatsoever. Why don't you state publicly here, as you have privately, that you were John Lennon's son in another life, and that John Lennon helps you write your music? Maybe then people will understand why you have such a "superior" attitude. |
|
|
|
Post by IanSingleton777 on Dec 4, 2003 5:23:14 GMT
YOU are the one coming across as "intolerant" and having an attitude problem, and it's not just with LongJohn. You have a habit of "talking down" to people, and use no manners or common courtesy whatsoever. Why don't you state publicly here, as you have privately, that you were John Lennon's son in another life, and that John Lennon helps you write your music? Maybe then people will understand why you have such a "superior" attitude. Well done, XPT! We finally get something of substance out of you! Such venom! Ready for 'Round 2' I see, after the last bit of strife --surely you know to what I refer to... I personally have never claimed I was Lennon's son in several past lives. That claim was made by others in the new book, "The Love You Make" by author Jewelle St. James. It is available on Amazon.com, among many other places. There is a whole chapter (and photo!) devoted to Ian Singleton in the book. I do claim that John has given me dozens of songs. But, then again, I have never told YOU any of this, so you have heard it through the rumor mill. You obviously thought that to bring this topic up would harm me, or damage me in some way. On the contrary. I am proud of my Lennon connection, fully documented in a published book. But back to a response to your verbal slam on me, which is strange in the sense that weren't you the same person who was so delicate, you couldn't bear to read further political BUSH bashing anymore? It OFFENDED you? And now you, in turn, strike out to offend me. By all means, insert yourself into this banter between LongJohn and myself! I can take it. I've been waiting for it from you! In fairness, as you attempt to attract scorn or negative attention to me by your post, let's discuss how Dan (Number 9) believes he is the reincarnation of Tara Browne, the 60's Beatle friend and Guiness heir. No comment on that, eh? Didn't think so. I do not care what your personal opinion is of me or my posts. Many, many members here enjoy the contribution I make. It's OK if you so obviously don't. And, please, if I am such a 'crackpot' then there wouldn't be an internationally-released book on John Lennon with a whole chapter about me in it! I have achieved some level of official recognition. I'm sure you take umbrage with that, too. In conclusion, I believe I have been very restrained towards you and a couple others, in light of the back-stabbing slams which appeared on my final post when I quit, and the unsavory activity which preceeded that. I came back because so many members ASKED me to privately. And who is displaying aggression to whom here? As if I cannot make a comment about a stupid photo without getting jumped? lol. PS the intelligent people I dialogue with are never "talked down" to. They know who they are. Have a nice day, XPT and LongJohn! |
|
Danthology
Contributor
"For awhile we can sit, smoke a pipe and discuss all the vast intricacies of life..."
Posts: 47
|
Post by Danthology on Dec 4, 2003 8:09:36 GMT
Well done, XPT! We finally get something of substance out of you! Such venom! Ready for 'Round 2' I see, after the last bit of strife --surely you know to what I refer to... I personally have never claimed I was Lennon's son in several past lives. That claim was made by others in the new book, "The Love You Make" by author Jewelle St. James. It is available on Amazon.com, among many other places. There is a whole chapter (and photo!) devoted to Ian Singleton in the book. I do claim that John has given me dozens of songs. But, then again, I have never told YOU any of this, so you have heard it through the rumor mill. You obviously thought that to bring this topic up would harm me, or damage me in some way. On the contrary. I am proud of my Lennon connection, fully documented in a published book. But back to a response to your verbal slam on me, which is strange in the sense that weren't you the same person who was so delicate, you couldn't bear to read further political BUSH bashing anymore? It OFFENDED you? And now you, in turn, strike out to offend me. By all means, insert yourself into this banter between LongJohn and myself! I can take it. I've been waiting for it from you! In fairness, as you attempt to attract scorn or negative attention to me by your post, let's discuss how Dan (Number 9) believes he is the reincarnation of Tara Browne, the 60's Beatle friend and Guiness heir. No comment on that, eh? Didn't think so. I do not care what your personal opinion is of me or my posts. Many, many members here enjoy the contribution I make. It's OK if you so obviously don't. And, please, if I am such a 'crackpot' then there wouldn't be an internationally-released book on John Lennon with a whole chapter about me in it! I have achieved some level of official recognition. I'm sure you take umbrage with that, too. In conclusion, I believe I have been very restrained towards you and a couple others, in light of the back-stabbing slams which appeared on my final post when I quit, and the unsavory activity which preceeded that. I came back because so many members ASKED me to privately. And who is displaying aggression to whom here? As if I cannot make a comment about a stupid photo without getting jumped? lol. PS the intelligent people I dialogue with are never "talked down" to. They know who they are. Have a nice day, XPT and LongJohn! ...fluffy, empty, back-patting syncophant waste? Seriously - can we keep all of this stuff out of the board? |
|
|
|
Post by PaulBearer on Dec 4, 2003 11:37:51 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Chris on Dec 4, 2003 13:28:24 GMT
:oI agree P.B. Ian - why is there a chapter devoted to you  How did Johnny give you songs I found what you wrote ALOT more interesting then the initial quibbling !!! Could you tell us a little more, please We're all here to try to uncover the truth. I feel that we should not fight so much over minutia. It's just not THAT important. I understand what you're saying Ian. I also understand what LongJohn & xpt are saying. It clouds the issue when people start fighting amongst themselves. I've also lost my temper & gotten annoyed in the past. It's hard not to sometimes. But, we have to try to keep one very important thing at the front of our minds. We, the people who want to get to the bottom of this mystery, are NOT the enemy. Bill, Yoko, the Illuminati & their agents are the enemy. They don't want the truth to come out. It would totally upset their applecarts !!! Just my opinion, of course... Love to all... Chris |
|
|
|
Post by Darkhorse on Dec 4, 2003 14:47:23 GMT
Hey guys - be cool ok? Youre arguing over a triviality.   Is it any more different to remove Billy's moustache as it is to put a moustache on Paul (as is on the 60IF site) for comparison purposes? Don't worry about how some outsiders or guests watching may or may not interpret this - anyone who would twist such a thing as proof that we're doing the doctoring is just out to cause trouble anyway and not worth worying about. I think it's interesting that we all have different life stories and yet can unite for the same purpose. How boring if we were all the same people! So, once again I say...stay cool guys. What I was saying but you said it a lot better! |
|
|
|
Post by eyesbleed on Dec 4, 2003 14:51:14 GMT
Who cares what the "guests" here think? Most of the trolls who take a chunk of their own free time to disrupt this site & insult the regulars are not gonne be swayed by evidence...... no matter how convincing.
You could actually have the 2 men standing side by side & "they" will still discount that sight as smoke & mirrors.
There's already enough evidence available to sway anybody who's got a halfway opened mind, & "they" are gonna slam us NO MATTER WHAT, so I don't see the point in any of this.
Taking the glasses & mustache off isn't creating any new hard evidence, but it is very interesting & I'm glad LJ took the time to do that. Why anybody would have a problem with that is beyond me.
Ya know...... sometimes you can stumble across some hard evidence where you least expect it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Darkhorse on Dec 4, 2003 15:16:56 GMT
"..."they" are gonna slam us NO MATTER WHAT..." Exactly true! |
|
|
|
Post by xpt626 on Dec 5, 2003 5:27:07 GMT
Well done, XPT! We finally get something of substance out of you! Such venom! Ready for 'Round 2' I see, after the last bit of strife --surely you know to what I refer to... ..... By all means, insert yourself into this banter between LongJohn and myself! I can take it. I've been waiting for it from you!.....if I am such a 'crackpot'.....the intelligent people I dialogue with are never "talked down" to. They know who they are. I simply asked you a question. You are full of personal attacks, and seem to be spoiling for a fight. Nice of you to post your resume' here, so that those with interest can follow up on it. You have no idea who I am, or what I have accomplished, although you make it evident that you believe yourself to be "just a little bit better than us". You proved my post by the final statement of your reply....who are you to determine who are and are not "intelligent people"? LOL. Thanks for the laugh ;D |
|
|
|
Post by IanSingleton777 on Dec 6, 2003 22:52:18 GMT
I simply asked you a question. You are full of personal attacks, and seem to be spoiling for a fight. Nice of you to post your resume' here, so that those with interest can follow up on it. You have no idea who I am, or what I have accomplished, although you make it evident that you believe yourself to be "just a little bit better than us". You proved my post by the final statement of your reply....who are you to determine who are and are not "intelligent people"? LOL. Thanks for the laugh ;D He who laughts last....Once again, your attempt to insert insult and injury is pretty limp. Sounds like, to me and several others here, that some misled people are quite JEALOUS and THREATENED by Ian Singleton and his posts, and his perspectives and such. That is a childish shame. I do not expect everyone to embrace my style or personality. But, when the gauntlet is thrown down, as was here towards me, obviously simmering from a recently-past situation...I will defend myself. If one reads this thread carefully, they will see the niggling, jealous sniping. I agreed with LongJohn a total of THREE times. More's the pity! IAN'S BACK...AND BUSTING FAUL'S BALLS!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ;D |
|
|
|
Post by IanSingleton777 on Dec 6, 2003 23:04:34 GMT
:oI agree P.B. Ian - why is there a chapter devoted to you How did Johnny give you songs I found what you wrote ALOT more interesting then the initial quibbling !!! Could you tell us a little more, please Chris Sure, Chris, thanks for the KIND words. I would be happy to dialogue with you concerning all this. Feel free to contact me via private message. -Ian  |
|
|
|
Post by gracemer on Dec 6, 2003 23:58:04 GMT
Thanks Long John for the pic--and JamesPaul and Sun King for their comparisons. They show more clearly than ever that it's a photo of Faul. This sort of thing is very helpful in convincing others.
|
|
How did Johnny give you songs 