|
|
Post by Piggies on Dec 19, 2003 20:06:39 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by TotalInformation on Dec 19, 2003 21:45:26 GMT
NOTE to moderators: these shots belong on the Faul board.
Poster "Piggies" seems to be trolling.
|
|
|
|
Post by authentic on Dec 19, 2003 22:13:09 GMT
Excuse me for asking why is George taller in this picture...Doctored  I know Paul is dead but Faul was much taller. |
|
|
|
Post by TheWatusi on Dec 19, 2003 22:36:36 GMT
why is this under the James Paul section?   here is a more accurate reference of Georges height in comparison to Fauls:  |
|
|
|
Post by PaulBearer on Dec 20, 2003 3:30:34 GMT
You know, you do tend to shrink when you get older. And Faul is/was about 10 years older than George.  |
|
|
|
Post by raymi46 on Dec 20, 2003 4:30:06 GMT
You know, you do tend to shrink when you get older. And Faul is/was about 10 years older than George. So true PB. I've shrunk 1/2 inch in the last couple of years and I'm not THAT old!  |
|
|
|
Post by Fwings on Dec 20, 2003 5:44:44 GMT
Look at the way Faul is standing in that first picture... one leg behind him, one leg forward, slightly behind both Ringo and George, and leaning to the side. While it wouldn't account for all of the missing height from the image TheWatusi posted, I think it could explain some.
|
|
I know Paul is dead but Faul was much taller.
