|
Post by killuminati on Apr 10, 2004 21:24:55 GMT
Hi forum! With the comparison of the Mike Mcgear DNA and Faul DNA the truth can be revealed. Im not a DNA expert, but if two brothers make this tests, the result is that they are brothers (or not if they arent). What you think, anyone familiar with DNA can tell more?
|
|
|
Post by MMCDHoward on Apr 10, 2004 22:00:40 GMT
well yes, that would prove it, but you'd have to get two DNA samples from them and get them to a lab, how do you think you'll get that done without suing Faul and getting the permission of the judge, and even if they do match, much like the leaders of this group said about pics that proved them wrong, the people in charge of the conspiracy "altered" the DNA, so there would be no point to it
|
|
|
Post by BillyJones on Apr 10, 2004 23:30:54 GMT
It's not that the DNA would be "altered". All they'd have to do is fake the results of the tests. Faul is a BILLIONAIRE. How hard would it be for him to work a wonder with the test results . They're not brothers. They're not even RELATED.
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Apr 10, 2004 23:44:17 GMT
Hi forum! With the comparison of the Mike Mcgear DNA and Faul DNA the truth can be revealed. Im not a DNA expert, but if two brothers make this tests, the result is that they are brothers (or not if they arent). What you think, anyone familiar with DNA can tell more? No need. The 60IF documentation is full exhaustive. Killuminati welcome!
|
|
|
Post by MMCDHoward on Apr 10, 2004 23:53:33 GMT
but you see my point, sometimes you can use undeniable proof about a point, and still people will argue and say anything to prove that its possible you're wrong
|
|
|
Post by killuminati on Apr 11, 2004 0:28:44 GMT
but you see my point, sometimes you can use undeniable proof about a point, and still people will argue and say anything to prove that its possible you're wrong No, i say this because will be another proof that paul died. But it is true what Billy Jones tell. Faul can fake the results
|
|
|
Post by MMCDHoward on Apr 11, 2004 0:42:28 GMT
it will be proof if they don't match, but even if they do, the people on this forum will always say "he faked the results, hes a billionaire, and used his money in some way" Its convenient that he can do that, and that the people who are behind this whole thing can doctor millions of photos that fans took without his knowledge, as well as doctoring album covers without doing anything to the faces of the other people in the photos, especially since they didn't have digital technology that could do it at that time! Living is easy with eyes closed, thats your line about me, but what about misunderstanding all you see maybe you misunderstand the clues as something else entirely
|
|
|
Post by BillyJones on Apr 11, 2004 1:56:00 GMT
I posted a ton of links, Within you. Did you BOTHER to check any of them? I will have no choice but to post photos myself. Photos that I will get directly from these fan sites. Fan sites that in no way acknowledge that Paul was replaced. Since they don't acknowledge it, they have no reason to doctor anything. Right? Maybe then you'll OPEN YOUR EYES! I have photos of Faul & Jim McCartney. He TOWERED over the older man. I have a photo of Paul & his dad. They were almost the same height. The photos of Faul at Mike McGear's wedding are from 1968. The one of Paul & his dad is most likely from 1966. NOONE grows that many inches from the age of 24 to the age of 26. It just doesn't happen. Not unless you are afflicted with a form of giganticism! Are you saying that the Paul McCartney of today has a form of giganticism? PLEASE
|
|
|
Post by MMCDHoward on Apr 11, 2004 2:11:28 GMT
I'm not saying that your pics aren't true, I'm saying that when I post a pic proving my pov, its obviously doctored
|
|
|
Post by BillyJones on Apr 11, 2004 2:16:27 GMT
I have never personally said that about anyone elses photos.
|
|
|
Post by MMCDHoward on Apr 11, 2004 2:54:27 GMT
Thats fine and dandy, in my original posting I said specifically the leaders of this forum, though many others do as well, if you don't, then you are one of the types who seems more willing to contribute real stuff and consider both sides
|
|
|
Post by Perplexed on Apr 11, 2004 4:58:10 GMT
So. like today I am in the recprd store, I am browsing thru the MCCartney CDs. and l and behold on the back of one of his earliest solo recxordings (either RAM, or MCCartney, I can't remember, they had all the CDS,but it was early 70's) anyway on the back is an outdoors photo with Paul in full beard and moustache. It, in my opinion, agrees with early 60's Paul completely. I mean, I couldn't expect anyone to think that was a stand-in or replacement. It just looks like Paul, a little later on. Now, some earlier photos seem very very different (66-68).
I do see support either way. I am very inclined, though to go with the replacement idea, but maybe fom confusion.
Anyone see "Face Off?" Far-fetched................contrived.............interesting concept.......
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Apr 11, 2004 11:54:43 GMT
but you see my point, sometimes you can use undeniable proof about a point, and still people will argue and say anything to prove that its possible you're wrong When the comparisons are done with full vintage material there is no question. Always. JAMES PAUL / FAUL COMPARISON
|
|
|
Post by BillyJones on Apr 11, 2004 14:37:41 GMT
Thank the gods for vintage material.
|
|
|
Post by gracemer on Apr 11, 2004 17:46:01 GMT
...I will have no choice but to post photos myself. Photos that I will get directly from these fan sites. Fan sites that in no way acknowledge that Paul was replaced. Since they don't acknowledge it, they have no reason to doctor anything. ... I have photos of Faul & Jim McCartney. He TOWERED over the older man. I have a photo of Paul & his dad. They were almost the same height. The photos of Faul at Mike McGear's wedding are from 1968. The one of Paul & his dad is most likely from 1966. NOONE grows that many inches from the age of 24 to the age of 26. It just doesn't happen. I hope you do. I've seen 2 of the photos you're referring to, but it would be nice to have them all together. And you're right about the growth. Doctors say men stop growing between 20-22; women 18-20. Growth in both sexes dramatically slows after 18, so if someone DOES continue to grow, it's very slow and very little. For example, I grew 5 inches between 15-16 and only one more inch between 16 and 20. What if someone obtained their DNA without their knowledge? They wouldn't know the test was being performed, so the results wouldn't be tampered with. Fun project.
|
|
|
Post by BillyJones on Apr 11, 2004 18:51:54 GMT
I am setting up a photo storage site today. I should be able to start posting photos tomorrow. Why don't you go to the links that I posted & look at the photos yourself? It would be very beneficial to have more than one of us posting photos from the same sources. That way, we can't be accused of bias. I wish that everyone would do that. Just go to the various sites with Paul & Faul photos. Copy the photos that seem relevant to each other & to us. Then post them for all of us to consider. This is the ONLY way to get to the bottom of this. To uncover the truth of the situation.
|
|
|
Post by Rojopa on Apr 11, 2004 23:38:05 GMT
Looking at the pictures of Paul and Faul anyone in their right mind can tell that they are the same person. It just so happens that Paul's face grew longer and his hair grew differently.
|
|
|
Post by Rojopa on Apr 11, 2004 23:59:02 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Rojopa on Apr 12, 2004 0:04:37 GMT
Oh, and btw: the pictures are of P(F)aul with his Dad. The first pictures was taken in 1966. The height difference is extraordinary!
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Apr 12, 2004 0:26:58 GMT
I hope you do. I've seen 2 of the photos you're referring to, but it would be nice to have them all together. And you're right about the growth. Doctors say men stop growing between 20-22; women 18-20. Growth in both sexes dramatically slows after 18, so if someone DOES continue to grow, it's very slow and very little. For example, I grew 5 inches between 15-16 and only one more inch between 16 and 20. What if someone obtained their DNA without their knowledge? They wouldn't know the test was being performed, so the results wouldn't be tampered with. Fun project. The photographic evidence HAS full legal value. About the DNA test I can hear by now from the "same" people that a DNA CAN change in a man between the age of 24-25 too. They have always no problem to tell lies.
|
|
|
Post by gracemer on Apr 12, 2004 1:52:39 GMT
Brilliant photos, Rojopa! I don't "get" that last one. To whom are we comparing Faul?
|
|
|
Post by gracemer on Apr 12, 2004 1:54:35 GMT
The photographic evidence HAS full legal value. About the DNA test I can hear by now from the "same" people that a DNA CAN change in a man between the age of 24-25 too. They have always no problem to tell lies. We'll need 2 volunteers. One to get pregnant by Mike McGear and one to get pregnant by Sir Faul. ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by BillyJones on Apr 12, 2004 5:34:07 GMT
Gracemer, the last photo is just to illustrate how Faul TOWERED over the whole McCartney clan. In the 1st photo it's quite obvious that Paul was not much taller than his dad. Rojopa posted photos that I sent to him for his perusal. Thank you Rojopa! The photos speak for themselves. Paul CAN speak from beyond the grave. In his photos.
|
|
|
Post by BillyJones on Apr 12, 2004 5:39:28 GMT
Gracemer - about someone getting pregnant by those two individuals all I can say is EEEWWWW. I was watching a special on forensic sciences this evening. It seems that you can get mitochondrial DNA from exhumed bodies. If we had to do it, we probably could get it from Paul's mom. If there's enough of her left after all of these years. She died in 1954 I believe. Also, if we could get ahold of Paul &/or Brian's skulls a forensic reconstruction could be done. To show what the individual looked like. Now I'd LOVE to see that. It will immediately be obvious that Paul's eye orbits are wider apart than Faul's!
|
|
|
Post by BillyJones on Apr 12, 2004 12:46:25 GMT
Sorry, everyone. When Rojopa posted those photos, he was unaware that he was compromising my security. I will be reposting those photos under the Clues section. One thread will read Paul/Faul & the McCartney clan. The other will read Paul & Jane vs. Faul & Jane. I will be posting those threads VERY soon. So stay tuned. I'm sorry Rojopa. I know how much time it takes to post these photos. The thing is if someone looks at the properties on a posted photo, they can see where it's stored. I am now storing my photos in a place that CANNOT be traced back to me. After what has previously happened here, can anyone BLAME me?
|
|