|
|
Post by beatled on Dec 26, 2004 17:12:00 GMT
Many thanks to Valis for scanning this!  ![]() http://*banned link*/Shoebox/Valis/BeatleBook1967.jpg[/img] |
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Dec 26, 2004 17:53:24 GMT
Note the close set eyes. The smaller ears. The unnaturally puffy cheeks.
Good job, JoJo & Vallis !
|
|
|
|
Post by beatled on Dec 26, 2004 21:37:03 GMT
Another cover: ![]() http://*banned link*/Shoebox/Valis/BeatlesBook2.jpg[/img] |
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Dec 26, 2004 21:50:52 GMT
In this photo, the left side of his face looks swollen. Anyone else see this ?
|
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on Dec 28, 2004 10:53:54 GMT
Many thanks to Valis for scanning this! ![]() http://*banned link*/Shoebox/Valis/BeatleBook1967.jpg [/img][/quote] Billy Shepherd as Fake Paul 1967-2001 He is always the same. When you look differences they are because different filler injections or photo doctoring. Just for nothing else. It's simple. |
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Dec 28, 2004 15:49:00 GMT
I have to agree with BeatlePaul on his last point !
|
|
lazur
Welcome new member
Posts: 8
|
Post by lazur on Oct 27, 2006 11:26:26 GMT
On the other side of the comparisons: I've yet to see any age-corrected photos of the 22-24 year old Paul into the 64 year old Paul. Althought the evidence to date is beyond contradiction , this may be a comparison to cause skeptics a re-think of their position.
|
|
|
|
Post by mindgames on Jul 12, 2007 5:27:01 GMT
Faul just looks like he is hiding something, in his eyes, Paul was always relaxed, looking like he owned the world and was self assured, and exuded confidence. He would stand with his thumbs in his belt loop. Faul has always looked like he was confused are trying to find himself or hiding something.
|
|
|
|
Post by ccinri on Jul 12, 2007 14:34:14 GMT
I agree with you on the body language issue. If you compare the LA press conference in '66 body language with that of the EMI interviews in December '66 you would never guess that only 4 months had lapsed. The LA meeting was after the horrible experience they had in the Phillipines while still stomping out the flames of the Jesus controversy. Yet they are still the same guys They were not dismissive of touring, or talking to reporters at length (although there is a great snippet at the end where Paul wears down a Dick Clark talking head). They are very witty, confident and united. Business as usual. There is actually a question regarding REPLACEMENTS posed to Paul. He says that they broached the idea to Brian, but it was nixed. The EMI interviews show something different. The Beatles all arrive separately and they are all nervously chirping the same party line, even Ringo. No more touring...no one can hear us...not what we really want to do...(Faul looks completely different). The confidence is gone and there is something definitely lacking (like the real Paul?).
|
|
