|
Post by beatled on Dec 27, 2004 15:11:13 GMT
I'll break this into a couple of posts, there are quite a few. More great stuff from Valis! February, 1967: http://*banned link*/Shoebox/Valis/bb43-1.jpg[/img] http://*banned link*/Shoebox/Valis/bb43-2.jpg[/img] March, 1967: http://*banned link*/Shoebox/Valis/bb44-1.jpg[/img] April, 1967: http://*banned link*/Shoebox/Valis/bb45-1.jpg[/img] http://*banned link*/Shoebox/Valis/bb45-2.jpg[/img] http://*banned link*/Shoebox/Valis/bb45-3.jpg[/img] http://*banned link*/Shoebox/Valis/bb45-4.jpg[/img] http://*banned link*/Shoebox/Valis/bb45-5.jpg[/img] http://*banned link*/Shoebox/Valis/bb45-6.jpg[/img] http://*banned link*/Shoebox/Valis/bb45-7.jpg[/img]
|
|
Hamlet
Contributor
To say it , or not to say it?
Posts: 90
|
Post by Hamlet on Dec 27, 2004 23:08:26 GMT
February and March issues are James Paul with moustache doctored
|
|
|
Post by TotalInformation on Dec 28, 2004 7:41:34 GMT
You're right, Hamlet. Interesting that they put JP-stache pics on the cover twice in a row.
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on Dec 28, 2004 8:48:46 GMT
February and March issues are James Paul with moustache doctored Exactly.... and mixing features of both. Funeral faces on everyone. The "easy going" lost forever with Paul.
|
|
|
Post by Perplexed on Dec 28, 2004 11:35:19 GMT
And, a couple of pics above. The man with John, Geo. and Paul--is that Neil in the "gaucho" hat? Is that the gaucha hat from the MMT film, whee the bus goes thru the woods and a man stands off to the side?......anyone recall such?
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Dec 28, 2004 15:41:51 GMT
VERY interesting indeed, T.I. & Hamlet. How do you suppose they got the editors of The Beatles Book to do that ? How did they convince them to doctor Paul's photos ? Who OWNS Beatles Monthly Book It's also interesting that in alot of Faul's early photos he has an imperial expression on his face. Like he considers himself better than everyone else. Or just better than James Paul was...
|
|
|
Post by TotalInformation on Dec 29, 2004 1:40:40 GMT
this is in-house propaganda -- official beatles fan club publication
|
|
|
Post by valis on Dec 29, 2004 2:15:16 GMT
The man in the last photo is David Crosby
|
|
|
Post by TotalInformation on Dec 29, 2004 2:31:19 GMT
I believe you're right, Valis. Good eye.
Or was it a good eye? Is there a caption?
Much of the rock music establishment was introduced to FAUL during the Pepper sessions, it seems.
|
|
|
Post by Perplexed on Dec 29, 2004 6:16:01 GMT
Yes, thank you Valis, I see that it is. Not used to seeing him in a young profile--but, you're obviously right.
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on Dec 29, 2004 9:32:42 GMT
Faul never or rarely holding a bass in those photos. Always on the piano or drums... instead
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on Dec 29, 2004 9:39:10 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Perplexed on Dec 29, 2004 11:46:44 GMT
OH!
Well, uhm, gosh.
|
|
|
Post by zazleek on Jan 6, 2005 22:36:44 GMT
The amazing thing about those doctored JPM pictures, is that they LOOK doctored, esp the second one - that moustache looks like it's been drawn on! How did anyone not notice it at the time
|
|
|
Post by PaulBearer on Jan 7, 2005 8:28:09 GMT
They weren't looking for it.
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Jan 7, 2005 16:59:05 GMT
Zazleek - WELCOME !!! ;D ;D ;D Thanks for pointing that out !
|
|
|
Post by unrepentant on Jan 7, 2005 23:00:50 GMT
no, they WEREN'T looking for it.....why would they LOL, paul wasn't "dead" until at least a year later! just from the standpoint of all the alteration and manipulation that is focused ONLY ON PAUL, there is a case to be made for a stange obsession existing, on the part of whoever calls the shots with official releases, with HIM. why? what i mean is, if you are an unbeliever, offer me an alternate explanation for why, on top of ALL THE REST of it [the sudden voice and appearance changes after late '66] there was suddenly a spotlight on paul, and a need to mess around with his appearance relative to the other beatles right up to this day? it's enough to make you erupt into hysterical giggles.
|
|
|
Post by Perplexed on Jan 8, 2005 6:20:50 GMT
These are good questions.
|
|