|
Tooth.
Jul 19, 2005 22:07:59 GMT
Post by TPIMaster on Jul 19, 2005 22:07:59 GMT
|
|
|
Tooth.
Jul 20, 2005 1:07:13 GMT
Post by byrdsmaniac on Jul 20, 2005 1:07:13 GMT
What's this?
|
|
|
Tooth.
Jul 22, 2005 5:25:04 GMT
Post by TheAquaOne on Jul 22, 2005 5:25:04 GMT
Hey does Faul's teeth match Pauls?
|
|
|
Tooth.
Jul 22, 2005 16:54:15 GMT
Post by TPIMaster on Jul 22, 2005 16:54:15 GMT
Hey does Faul's teeth match Pauls? According to PIA fades: No ;D And then they say it's distance but the structure doesn't match either. (And if it's distance, the rest of the fade (while it doesn't really match) shouldn't match either )
|
|
|
Tooth.
Sept 18, 2005 11:48:07 GMT
Post by faul ramone on Sept 18, 2005 11:48:07 GMT
that fade pretty much matched....eyes lines in face...nose!!! the left tooth...his left//our right in the 1964 pic isn't capped as the 1969 pic is so if that tooth is offa bit theres the explanation..but to me the rest matches pretty well.....
|
|
|
Tooth.
Sept 19, 2005 13:20:05 GMT
Post by plastic paul on Sept 19, 2005 13:20:05 GMT
Well IMO there's always been something odd about Let It Be Faul.
A lot of people claim its because the beard masks his face, but he is a VERY good likeness of JPM, yet how can it be, because he then went back to being an average lookalike?
Did JPM not die but leave the band to get away from the limelight?
Was there a production line of fauls?
As always, so many questions, aarghhh!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
Tooth.
Sept 19, 2005 21:34:32 GMT
Post by faul ramone on Sept 19, 2005 21:34:32 GMT
that fade can almost squash this whole theory......check out the laugh lines.....woooooow its a match....
|
|
|
Tooth.
Sept 19, 2005 23:13:37 GMT
Post by plastic paul on Sept 19, 2005 23:13:37 GMT
I agree to an extent but i think there's something untoward about LIB, but you sound pretty sure......
So are you saying you're PIND?
Because don't get me wrong i'm still most definitely PID, yet i think theres a LIB anomaly that doesn't relate solely to his beard!
|
|
|
Tooth.
Sept 20, 2005 8:14:21 GMT
Post by BeatlePaul on Sept 20, 2005 8:14:21 GMT
The truth still remain this: Just looking at Faul's mouth side borders....
|
|
|
Tooth.
Sept 20, 2005 10:16:48 GMT
Post by plastic paul on Sept 20, 2005 10:16:48 GMT
that fade can almost squash this whole theory......check out the laugh lines.....woooooow its a match.... If you are intimating that the fade shows the same guy, you are on the wrong forum. Thats what i was trying to hint at.
|
|
|
Tooth.
Sept 20, 2005 15:08:01 GMT
Post by weighe on Sept 20, 2005 15:08:01 GMT
Bill's teeth are all over the map...in most photos where they're visible, they look shorter than JPM's...more square shaped. In a few photos where he's really grinning big and making it a point to show his teeth, they look closer to JPM's. I'm thinking these are various dentures: The "everyday" ones, which are the shorter ones, fit his jaw, and he can talk and sing. When he sings, he keeps his upper lip pulled down to hide the gum-line...JPM didn't do that. The longer ones used for his "grin" photos would probably be painful to wear everyday, but they're only needed for an occasional photo.
|
|
|
Tooth.
Sept 20, 2005 15:18:55 GMT
Post by weighe on Sept 20, 2005 15:18:55 GMT
Hey does Faul's teeth match Pauls? According to PIA fades: No ;D And then they say it's distance but the structure doesn't match either. (And if it's distance, the rest of the fade (while it doesn't really match) shouldn't match either ) I tend to agree. Funny thing is that LIB photo doesn't look like it would match what he really looked like:
|
|
moped
Contributor
Posts: 115
|
Tooth.
Jun 30, 2006 14:40:11 GMT
Post by moped on Jun 30, 2006 14:40:11 GMT
|
|
|
Tooth.
Jul 2, 2006 7:10:10 GMT
Post by Perplexed on Jul 2, 2006 7:10:10 GMT
|
|
|
Tooth.
Jul 2, 2006 9:14:33 GMT
Post by Perplexed on Jul 2, 2006 9:14:33 GMT
One thing I notice about Paul's performing in many early videos, some middle, and few later. He frequently drops his jaw, no, actually, pops it open quickly, and grins with a wide open mouth. It's a trademark; it's expressive; it looks 100% natural and unforced, that's just a Paulism I think. Ringo is equally facially animated. George was more sparing. John mugged sarcastically. John also connected with his material when he wanted to..........George's connection was honest and unadorned. Ringo and Paul were anmated, but not trying to steal the show.No. George, Paul, John and Ringo were all team players. Some of you are going to respond by saying that Bill was not a team player. But I don't think tha is the correct assessment. I really think he was, for the most part. At the last, during the 1970 break-up, well, a lot of attitude was being slung and from all sides. But at the outset, I think, and well thru Abbey Road, I think all four were really putting in the effort to make it work. Yoko's presence was a factor. Linda. What about Linda's presence. Do any of you wonder: did Yoko and Linda ever run off to the powder room during recording sessions and get ito a mutual b*tch fight over the lavatory? Could it have been? Probably not. That sounds like the sort of cheap swipe you'd expect to see in a third rate made-for-TV movie about the unravelling of the Beatles. Aaron Spelling--hurry up and get well, baby. We're gonna need you soon. We got the concept; you got the studios. OK, OK, NO i woulodn't dare. I think the ratings would go off the scale though, in a show showing Linda and Yoko having a 10 minute drag-down, knock-out wrestling match in the ladies privy.
|
|
rhye
Contributor
Posts: 43
|
Tooth.
Jul 20, 2010 19:53:50 GMT
Post by rhye on Jul 20, 2010 19:53:50 GMT
hahaha that's a show I would like to see xD
|
|