|
|
Post by LongJohn on Oct 17, 2003 6:30:46 GMT
it's weird because we always hear about julian and sean, but i've never heard about george and ringo's sons... what about them?
|
|
|
|
Post by Forum Manager on Oct 17, 2003 15:45:25 GMT
what about tara's sons?
|
|
|
|
Post by mike on Oct 19, 2003 2:23:49 GMT
To quote the great Jerry Seinfeld "What's the deal w/ that?"
|
|
|
|
Post by LongJohn on Oct 20, 2003 18:06:09 GMT
just curious!  |
|
|
|
Post by LongJohn on Oct 29, 2003 8:58:37 GMT
this is what i meant... members.fortunecity.com/jlennongrrl/beatle_kids.htmgo there if you want to be AMAZED at how much dhani looks like his father... it's amazing. and of course ringo's kids also look a lot like him. and that's what i meant, you can tell without any doubt that john, george and ringo's kids are their kids, because they look a lot like them. in "paul's" case... well, you know... they could have been someone elses kids and nobody would notice the difference... |
|
|
|
Post by Karma76 on Oct 29, 2003 20:07:31 GMT
OK i think James looks like Paul, he has the droopy eyes.
ok adding ALONG with mary....has the same droppy eyes.
|
|
|
|
Post by TheWatusi on Oct 29, 2003 22:31:56 GMT
and regarding the sons, who of them know?
|
|
|
|
Post by Karma76 on Oct 30, 2003 19:03:38 GMT
yeah now i am doubting since mary and james look so so much like paul/faul and their birthdates are fauls' generation and you can't genetically inherit cosmetic sugery traits.
|
|
|
|
Post by yellowmatter on Oct 31, 2003 20:23:27 GMT
No wait a second, look at Stella, she appears to have the same round face that we've come to expect from James paul mccartney- you cannot doubt that can you. She resembles him from the early sixties years.
|
|
|
|
Post by Curious on Nov 1, 2003 10:31:25 GMT
I don't think that Stella looks much like Paul at all! And round faces can o back generations in families. For example, I have a round face, but neither of my parents do. However, my grandmother has a round face.
And Karma, bear in mind that Willaim Sheppard had a close likeness to Paul in the first place - just had the wrong shaped face. It stands to readon that his kids could look a little like Paul.
|
|
|
|
Post by Karma76 on Nov 3, 2003 17:29:28 GMT
See those droppy eyes just make me question. Fauls eyes were not as droppy surgery did it. so for them to have that trait seems off to me.
|
|
|
|
Post by PaulBearer on Nov 4, 2003 7:55:35 GMT
But didn't Linda have droopy eyes?
|
|
|
|
Post by Karma76 on Nov 4, 2003 18:19:35 GMT
i do not think as much as pauls at all. like if you look at mary and james he looks like a mccartney (aka real paul) Stella eyes are not droopy really.
|
|
seibu
Contributor
Posts: 13
|
Post by seibu on Nov 4, 2003 19:02:28 GMT
Hmm. Well, to apply Occam's Razor here, the most likely explanation for Faul's kids looking like Paul (and they do) is that they really are Paul's kids and that there is no Faul. Simple.
However, the most likely (only) explanation for the discrepancies between head size, nose shape, ear postion, height and chin position between the Butcher's photos and Pepper's is some kind of switch. Therefore we'll just have to conclude that due to Bill's pretty good resemblance to Paul (which after all is why he got the job in the first place) his kids also resemble Paul. He got pretty lucky there. Simple.
And you know what? I'd be surprised if they were in on it - there's no need. I'd suspect the only people who know there was a switch are those who absolutely had to know - so that's The Beatles themselves and some of Paul's family. That's it. Why complicate the matter?
|
|
|
|
Post by beldabeast on Nov 4, 2003 19:18:20 GMT
yeah now i am doubting since mary and james look so so much like paul/faul and their birthdates are fauls' generation and you can't genetically inherit cosmetic sugery traits. FAULS daughter has that puffy lower lip like FAUL before the surgery. |
|
|
|
Post by Karma76 on Nov 4, 2003 19:54:52 GMT
who mary or stella?
|
|
