|
|
Post by Chris on Jul 31, 2003 12:33:15 GMT
 Ist, I want to say that every day Andy amazes me more & more. The new photos he has on the 1st page of his website are extroardinary... What a fine job he's doing to keep Paul's memory alive ( the same for you #9 !!! )... To help bring out the TRUTH... Onto Paul's eyes. I don't rightly remember if this has been touched on . If it has on the old forum, it needs to be revisited in this forum. I was thinking about this for quite awhile, but due to my slight senility, I keep forgetting to write about it < duh > ... Anyway, I was just admiring Andy's latest handiwork, when it hit me again. Paul's eyes had a definite slant to them. No question. I also don't think they were even with each other. Fauls's eyes are perfectly spaced. No slant at all... How can this go unnoticed. It actually gives both of their faces a different look ... Does anyone else see this  ? Always searching for the TRUTH... Chris ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by Chris on Jul 31, 2003 12:53:04 GMT
 Me again. It seems I'm on a roll. I don't remember if this was touched on in the old Forum. It definitely needs to be mentioned now. I was just looking over your website, Andy. I was so impressed with the changes you made on the front page, I wanted to make sure I haven't missed anything else you might have done. So, I went thorugh it, looking at the comparison photos again. While doing this, I came across another glaring difference between Paul & Faul. Again, I don't remember if this has been mentioned before. If it has, please forgive me for bringing it up again... Paul's left eyelid drooped. Faul's does not... This is especially noticeable in the later photos of him, when he was so ill... Bye, bye... Love to all... Chris 
|
|
|
|
Post by Uberkinder on Jul 31, 2003 12:54:21 GMT
Yeah, you'll notice in the new front page comparison, the inside corners of the eyes; I forget what they are called, but they do not move and are considered a scientific reference for comparison; they line up, yet the pupils do not; Paul's right eye moves up slightly. Faul's eyes are relatively level, and you will notice in other pictures where his eyes are relaxed that they made his right eyelid sag a little in order to give the illusion that that eye is lower down like Paul's.
Another thing about the faces is that the bridge of Paul's nose was slightly crooked to the right. You'll notice Paul's head looks like it's rotating slightly to the right, and yet the eyes are level. This is because Paul's raised eye and crooked bridge being matched to Faul's.
|
|
|
|
Post by Forum Manager on Aug 1, 2003 1:51:49 GMT
yeah and paul's eyes are so very droopy, whereas faul's were also wide open! |
|
|
|
Post by Chris on Aug 1, 2003 12:30:44 GMT
 Yep to all observations... Good guying, guys !!!! Love to all... Chris '
|
|
|
|
Post by Revolver on Aug 23, 2003 21:56:56 GMT
Slightly off key with this one, but it seems the right eyebrow of faul is a bit more arched and goes along with the right lazy eye of faul.
|
|
|
|
Post by beldabeast on Sept 4, 2003 17:17:39 GMT
yeah and paul's eyes are so very droopy, whereas faul's were also wide open! I have noticed that Fauls eyes look wide open with fear when he looks at a camera . I have this "game I like to do with people's pictures. I learned it from the Dick Cavette show or somewhere. Cover up one side of the face and see the expression , then likewise with the other side . It is supposed to reveal a persons public vs private personality . Innocent vs sinister , or happy verson sad , open vs sneaky , or such as that . |
|
Ist, I want to say that every day Andy amazes me more & more. The new photos he has on the 1st page of his website are extroardinary... What a fine job he's doing to keep Paul's memory alive ( the same for you #9 !!! )... To help bring out the TRUTH...
?
Me again. It seems I'm on a roll. I don't remember if this was touched on in the old Forum. It definitely needs
Yep to all observations... Good guying, guys !!!!