Post by TheeCavendeshLane on Sept 21, 2003 4:25:04 GMT
its interesting because the Beatles are all about the Double
and The Beatles album , the White Album is a Double Album
and ... I was always amazed by the way that Peter Best was
just dropped as the story goes and replaced by Ringo just
before the Beatles success...that together with the fact that
Ringo himself in some ways seemed to be the one who most needed
the lil help from his friends to get by in the band. I wonder
who does sing that song on Pepper--obviously its meant to sound
like Ringo and the song kind of makes perfect sense as a song that
Ringo might sing--singing out of tune but thats okay the cool guys
in the band will help you out because they are cool and fab. To me
it made the fact of Paul's central position in the photo's all the
more obvious becuase I thought shouldnt they be introducing good
old Ringo as Shears? But Paul had the central position. Paul was
higher than the rest in the photo--so much so in my opinion that
it almost looks like he was photoshoped into the picture--that the
photo of the other three was taken from one perspective or from
some distance while the photo of Faul was taken from some other
distance or perspective--all the others seem so slight compared to
Faul. Nothing is Real. You know what's funny? Your average person
who doesnt have a clue about PID or 60IF and who hasnt seen the
great work of Sun King or Uber DOES notice that Paul must have
had substantial plactic surgery--The average person can see that
his face does not looks constructed and does not look natural--Paul's face is almost as bad as Michael Jackson's --But if they would just stop
and think and ask themselves why in heck would the heart throb
Beatle have found it necessary to undergoe such substantial changes?
Has any one notice that Faul's ears look like they have been through
a meat grinder? I think they are heavily retouched sometimes. Many
of the Beatles pics have been retouched over the years. In a way the
Bealtes were like a monarch or despot or dictator groomed for life
during child hood to be the perfect King--so no pics shoe the blemish
and all we know of him at any one time is what they want us to know--its all a cover story--hmmm an album cover story and a cover
story . You know what is rotten about Faul? Its that he sleeps like a
baby.
and The Beatles album , the White Album is a Double Album
and ... I was always amazed by the way that Peter Best was
just dropped as the story goes and replaced by Ringo just
before the Beatles success...that together with the fact that
Ringo himself in some ways seemed to be the one who most needed
the lil help from his friends to get by in the band. I wonder
who does sing that song on Pepper--obviously its meant to sound
like Ringo and the song kind of makes perfect sense as a song that
Ringo might sing--singing out of tune but thats okay the cool guys
in the band will help you out because they are cool and fab. To me
it made the fact of Paul's central position in the photo's all the
more obvious becuase I thought shouldnt they be introducing good
old Ringo as Shears? But Paul had the central position. Paul was
higher than the rest in the photo--so much so in my opinion that
it almost looks like he was photoshoped into the picture--that the
photo of the other three was taken from one perspective or from
some distance while the photo of Faul was taken from some other
distance or perspective--all the others seem so slight compared to
Faul. Nothing is Real. You know what's funny? Your average person
who doesnt have a clue about PID or 60IF and who hasnt seen the
great work of Sun King or Uber DOES notice that Paul must have
had substantial plactic surgery--The average person can see that
his face does not looks constructed and does not look natural--Paul's face is almost as bad as Michael Jackson's --But if they would just stop
and think and ask themselves why in heck would the heart throb
Beatle have found it necessary to undergoe such substantial changes?
Has any one notice that Faul's ears look like they have been through
a meat grinder? I think they are heavily retouched sometimes. Many
of the Beatles pics have been retouched over the years. In a way the
Bealtes were like a monarch or despot or dictator groomed for life
during child hood to be the perfect King--so no pics shoe the blemish
and all we know of him at any one time is what they want us to know--its all a cover story--hmmm an album cover story and a cover
story . You know what is rotten about Faul? Its that he sleeps like a
baby.