|
|
Post by JamesPaul & Brian on Oct 9, 2003 8:40:34 GMT
I read an objection about "photos taken from a different angle". Two different photos of the same subject taken from different angle and put into an animation have as result a little movie of the subject. NOTHING ELSE. The evidence:   The photos above are taken EVEN from different sources. From that page |
|
|
|
Post by TheWatusi on Oct 10, 2003 0:48:03 GMT
funny how people dispute camera angle evidence when it works on John, Paul, and faul, just not faul in comparison to Paul, isnt it?
|
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Oct 10, 2003 8:19:53 GMT
funny how people dispute camera angle evidence when it works on John, Paul, and faul, just not faul in comparison to Paul, isnt it? : Perfect!  |
|
|
|
Post by Eggman on Oct 10, 2003 13:12:34 GMT
CLAPS FOR THE WATUSI HERE!!!! ;D  |
|
|
|
Post by Forum Manager on Oct 12, 2003 22:30:03 GMT
was the second pic doctored? it looks like paul's chin gets longer.
|
|
|
|
Post by Curious on Oct 14, 2003 14:57:59 GMT
I'd say not - it's just seeming that way as he's opening his mouth. Besides, if it was doctored, surely they would have doctored his nose too?
|
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Oct 15, 2003 8:00:48 GMT
When one smiles opening mouth his chin grows because muscles compression. Try by yourself against a mirror. |
|
