|
|
Post by Curious on Oct 9, 2003 13:30:02 GMT
Just been looking at james-paul-mccartney.5u.com/show-case.html and I noticed one major thing. Faul has much longer fingers than Paul, and they are much slimmer and more tapered. I don't really understand how THAT has gone unnoticed, especially by other musicians. Faul has what are commonly known as "pianist's hands", and are far moe elgant. Paul's, on the other hand, look a little on the stubby, chubby side. |
|
|
|
Post by Eggman on Oct 9, 2003 17:58:13 GMT
We already talk about that  |
|
|
|
Post by Curious on Oct 9, 2003 20:32:21 GMT
OK, sorry to repeat. Anyone got a link to the thread in question, please?  |
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Oct 9, 2003 20:45:48 GMT
Just been looking at james-paul-mccartney.5u.com/show-case.html and I noticed one major thing. Faul has much longer fingers than Paul, and they are much slimmer and more tapered. I don't really understand how THAT has gone unnoticed, especially by other musicians. Faul has what are commonly known as "pianist's hands", and are far moe elgant. Paul's, on the other hand, look a little on the stubby, chubby side. In comparison with the heads Faul has SMALLER hands than James Paul's ones. In those comparison heads' dimension was equalized. |
|
|
|
Post by Curious on Oct 9, 2003 21:36:42 GMT
What I actually meant was that in relation to the length of the back of his palm, was that the fingers were longer. The ratio of the distance from knuckle to first finger joint is longer on Faul's hands than Paul's.
If that makes any sense at all...
|
|
Pat
Contributor
Posts: 69
|
Post by Pat on Oct 9, 2003 22:06:33 GMT
going off topic but i stumbled upon this picture in that URL:  This same picture (allbeit much smaller) was in the white album poster.. who the hell is this guy? |
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Oct 9, 2003 22:10:30 GMT
Pat: [glow=red,2,300]WELCOME!!![/glow] It's Mal Evans...without glasses. What do you think about?
|
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Oct 10, 2003 11:42:18 GMT
What I actually meant was that in relation to the length of the back of his palm, was that the fingers were longer. The ratio of the distance from knuckle to first finger joint is longer on Faul's hands than Paul's. If that makes any sense at all... Ooops ...now I've understood. Yes, in a proportional meaning, Faul's fingers are longer in comparisone with his palm. |
|
|
|
Post by Curious on Oct 10, 2003 12:20:57 GMT
I should have explained better in the first place - sorry!
|
|
