|
Post by Eggman on Oct 14, 2003 18:04:04 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Darkhorse on Oct 15, 2003 0:58:56 GMT
Billy no doubt! The long face gives him away.
|
|
|
Post by TheWatusi on Oct 15, 2003 2:30:35 GMT
what a naughty boy !
|
|
|
Post by eyesbleed on Oct 15, 2003 3:02:09 GMT
This will give me an excuse to see if I can post pics. After I found this site I was thinkin' .... Now who did I paint for Paul in my Beatles set. Yep.... the long shaped head sez it all!! (that's OK, my Dead Paul/Old Faul painting should be done soon) ...I had to come back & fix this one too. This has been my posting pics lesson for the evening!
|
|
|
Post by eyesbleed on Oct 15, 2003 3:11:28 GMT
Oh crap, guess I did something wrong. Don't know what tho.... I put the URL in between the img & the /img. Hhmmmmmmm
DUH... I see from stats that the link I had here gets hit a LOT! No need for that since I finally figured out how to post pics. Sorry! Shoulda remembered to edit that out earlier.
(Ya, the Faul painting is OK... not great, but the complete set of 4 paintings together IS quite awsome)
|
|
|
Post by eyesbleed on Oct 15, 2003 4:15:25 GMT
It looks like you're posting an html link instead of one to the image. Easy mistake Thanks. (edit last post) It finally clicked what you're sayin'! ANYWAY..... as I was sayin' ... that long face sez it all Looks like I painted Faul
|
|
|
Post by Eggman on Oct 15, 2003 19:26:18 GMT
Congratulations friend!!! Great work!!!! ;D
|
|
|
Post by eyesbleed on Oct 16, 2003 2:08:33 GMT
Congratulations friend!!! Great work!!!! ;D THANKS......but the "Dead Paul/Old Faul" painting is lookin' like it's gonna be WAY MUCHO better! I'm lovin' the finished Dead Paul side. The Old Faul side may take longer.... got lots of wrinkles to paint!!! It looks like it's gonna be another week or 2 before it's finished & on my website; where I can post it here. From what I can find, this may be the first piece of PID-art available on the internet ! (& it's darn good too)
|
|
|
Post by Eggman on Oct 16, 2003 18:50:06 GMT
Yeah!!! Go on with the good work friend!!!
|
|
|
Post by JakesBrie on Oct 19, 2003 23:29:32 GMT
Nice work, eyes.
Brie
|
|
|
Post by IanSingleton777 on Oct 20, 2003 0:45:09 GMT
No intention to rile ya up, but the painting looks more like George than Paul/Faul.
As for the pic from vintage 1967 magazine; it is strange. VERY strange indeed. The distance between the eyes is decidedly PAUL. At first I thought they found a late '66 pic that was unpublished. But the face shape is Faul. But..this pic is VERY GOOD and slick, almost pulling off the transition. I guess they had photo-op air-brushing in '67....this is a good job.
The deeper implications are; whomever was in charge of the 'meat and potatos' of the impersonation & cover-up KNEW that the distance between the eyes was obvious. Knew it was a weak point. Hence, this photo.
One wonders WHY they didn't take such pains to doctor the SGT. PEPPER album pics. The eye distance looks barely like one inch or so between them on the album. Or, conversely, the BAND demanded complete control of their album art...perhaps they intentionally didn't want to doctor the photos...
|
|
|
Post by eyesbleed on Oct 20, 2003 3:56:28 GMT
Yes, that's one of the best things about this MB. Great pics! All kinds of great pics I've never seen before. Y'all, collectively seem to have EVERYTHING. I've been wondering the same thing about the Sgt.Pepper cover.... it just screams out that Paul's different. Don't guess it mattered, most people paid little attention anyway. I certainly didn't get it back then. Hey I can't be riled too easily. I did the 4pc Beatles set 10yrs ago & my next batch of Beatle-related art will be better.. Here's the george painting btw!
|
|
|
Post by pennylane on Oct 20, 2003 4:00:18 GMT
wow!! that is brilliant.. you could never mistake that as anyone other than george... do you have one of John.. ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by eyesbleed on Oct 20, 2003 4:04:57 GMT
Do I have one of John?? My Favorite by far!!!
|
|
|
Post by pennylane on Oct 20, 2003 4:06:51 GMT
|
|
|
Post by eyesbleed on Oct 20, 2003 4:12:02 GMT
Thank you VERY much. Glad y'all like-em. (.Sorry, didn't mean to steer the thread off the original topic!...)
|
|
|
Post by pennylane on Oct 20, 2003 4:17:07 GMT
Thank you VERY much. Glad y'all like-em. (.Sorry, didn't mean to steer the thread off the original topic!...) dont' be we can always steer it right on back again... so did you recognize that guy?... ;D ;D BTW thanks for sharing your work it truly is amazing
|
|
|
Post by eyesbleed on Oct 20, 2003 4:29:12 GMT
dont' be we can always steer it right on back again... so did you recognize that guy?... ;D ;D BTW thanks for sharing your work it truly is amazing Ok then, I can't resist one more. A collage I made from cutting a set of prints into fourths & using one fourth of each print. Try to recognize this fellow!
|
|
|
Post by Perplexed on Oct 20, 2003 7:38:35 GMT
His name is Sir Ringaul McLennison
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Oct 20, 2003 9:40:07 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Curious on Oct 20, 2003 9:44:11 GMT
Thing is, the above 2 pictures look nothing like the same guy. Very strange.
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Oct 20, 2003 9:49:04 GMT
Thing is, the above 2 pictures look nothing like the same guy. Very strange. ...but the matching is perfect except eyes shape....and the famous "rubber ears" Faul "wore" during Beatles films... ...doctoring on doctoring.....
|
|
|
Post by Curious on Oct 20, 2003 9:53:43 GMT
The bloke on the right is one of the oddest looking people I have ever seen - reminds me of one of the regular cast members from "EastEnders"!
|
|
|
Post by Nick910 on Oct 20, 2003 9:57:40 GMT
The one on the right looks nothing like Paul or the Faul Paul. Are you sure its him (them)?
P.s. - Maybe the first photo is a step in the other direction proving that Paul is Paul. Maybe telling us that Sgt Peppers front cover was a wind up. Or maybe proof that something weird happened to Paul that made him look different for some reason or another. Some f*cked up disease like the supposed bowl problem he had and managed to keep pretty well covered.
I don't know what, but Im gonna try and find good in all I see, I don't wanna believe until the evidence drowns me.
Hey, that rhymes, maybe I'll use it in a song!
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Oct 20, 2003 10:11:44 GMT
The one on the right looks nothing like Paul or the Faul Paul. Are you sure its him (them)? All abut Botox "miracles" P.s. - Maybe the first photo is a step in the other direction proving that Paul is Paul. Maybe telling us that Sgt Peppers front cover was a wind up. Or maybe proof that something weird happened to Paul that made him look different for some reason or another. Some f*cked up disease like the supposed bowl problem he had and managed to keep pretty well covered. Not at all. It proves that Faul is ALWAYS Faul. Make-up and botox injection make the difference. Sorry but evidence is full conclusive. It' s only SO HARD to accept. Nothing else. And I DO KNOW that!
|
|