|
|
Post by Karma76 on Oct 23, 2003 14:12:06 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Oct 23, 2003 15:26:53 GMT
That with the signatures on is clearly a photomontage.
Please check out vintage 45 covers to discover the truth about.
|
|
|
|
Post by Eggman on Oct 23, 2003 22:33:28 GMT
Sorry!!! I have to post this pic again ;D   |
|
|
|
Post by pennylane on Oct 23, 2003 22:34:37 GMT
this is my favourite, it speaks for itself... ;D |
|
|
|
Post by Darkhorse on Oct 24, 2003 0:32:52 GMT
Those pictures are great! Ringo is about 3 inchers shorter than the other three. I was wrong about their height but after seeing MANY videos and pictures of the three Beatles I would say that Paul is the tallest, maybe a half inch or a full inch taller than John and George is somewhere in between the two....taller than John by a hair and shorter than Paul by a hair. |
|
|
|
Post by zoona on Oct 26, 2003 14:29:46 GMT
I have some early Beatles mags, which I have mentioned on another thread that give their vital statistics..
Paul, John and George are detailed as 5' 11
Ringo detailed as 5' 8
|
|
|
|
Post by IanSingleton777 on Oct 27, 2003 13:53:45 GMT
this is my favourite, it speaks for itself... ;D You got it, SPANK! John, Paul, and George eyebrow-to-eyebrow same in heighth. Some of the other photos posted before this one we cannot use as reference points, for example the otherwise excellent color HELP! shot shows P,G,J all same height but Ringo standing on something making himself taller! So we have to be uber careful while claiming reference points. This one that is your fave DOES say it all. ;D The B&W one with the brick wall in the background is very good, too. John & Paul line up well and their eyebrows are identical height from man to man! Excellent angle. |
|
|
|
Post by IanSingleton777 on Oct 27, 2003 14:01:36 GMT
[quote author=Karma76 link=board=60ifclues&thread=1066918326&start=0#0 jpg[/img] There are many more on this girls site that show the height being the same. Question, Now do we have autographs to compare?  ? now THAT would be VERY intersting.[/quote] Autograph comparison for our purposes is essentially useless. Neil and Mal learned to sign the band's autographs perfectly, and did by the thousands. You'd have to be a specialist in the field to get it all right. The top faked (and sold for big $$$) autographs are JFK & The Beatles (meaning all four beatles on one photo...) In the Kennedy White House, he had an autopen invented to sign his publicity photos he'd send people who wrote in. The autopen was an automated metal contraption which would mimic his signature and hold a pen and they'd slip a glossy 8x10 under it and turn it on, and it would sign! There is even a whole BOOK written in an attempt to decipher between the handsigned and the autopen!  |
|
|
|
Post by MotherNaureSon on Oct 28, 2003 16:25:28 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Eggman on Oct 28, 2003 18:06:44 GMT
And to compare...............  |
|
|
|
Post by MotherNaureSon on Oct 29, 2003 11:01:05 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Mollymalone on Nov 1, 2003 16:09:07 GMT
 This one is almost like a police line up...you know...with the height lines on the wall behind the criminals? Here the stairs act like those lines |
|
|
|
Post by Eggman on Nov 2, 2003 13:30:52 GMT
Can't see the pic  |
|
|
|
Post by Mollymalone on Nov 2, 2003 19:29:08 GMT
|
|
? now THAT would be VERY intersting.
