|
Post by Curious on Oct 25, 2003 13:32:35 GMT
I bought an unofficial Beatles calendar today, and most, if not all, images are pre-1967. I think that only one of the images may hvae been doctored - the rest appear to be genuine. No long face, no hamster-cheeks, no scars on chin, no strange mouth. I'll get the scanner fired up and get the pictures with Paul in uploaded to my webspace, and get them posted as soon as I can.
|
|
|
Post by Curious on Oct 25, 2003 14:49:22 GMT
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Oct 25, 2003 15:41:08 GMT
I just won an auction on Ebay for a collection of old teen magazines spanning 1964-1966. (Beatles themed of course) Assuming the seller is honest (that's always a worry on Ebay) I should be getting them next week sometime hopefully. Looked interesting like someone's shoebox of magazines, news clippings, etc. I'll be posting anything interesting as soon as I can. If nothing else, there should be some great pictures of Paul to see! For example Curious, there is a newspaper clipping of the sixth b&w picture down on your post.
|
|
|
Post by Curious on Oct 25, 2003 15:47:51 GMT
Just looking at the pic you referenced, JoJo, I noticed something about his hair. It's almost the same style as Faul's on the Sergeant Pepper's cover. And yet his face looks no longer, he looks no different. To all the naysayers who blame it on the haircut - look again!
|
|
|
Post by raymi46 on Oct 25, 2003 17:16:10 GMT
On the sixth picture down, he used to be holding a cig.
|
|
|
Post by raymi46 on Oct 25, 2003 17:50:28 GMT
Good question. does faul smoke?
|
|
|
Post by onlooker on Oct 25, 2003 21:38:03 GMT
Definitely!
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Oct 26, 2003 9:05:44 GMT
NO COMMENT
|
|
|
Post by Curious on Oct 26, 2003 13:09:00 GMT
The hands are just totally wrong! As is the nose, and the eyebrows.
|
|
|
Post by Perplexed on Oct 27, 2003 2:19:31 GMT
|
|