|
|
Post by beldabeast on Oct 25, 2003 23:52:31 GMT
Could someone locate that side by side Ringo-Faul
comparison pic ? I need it and can not remember where it was .
Thanks !
|
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Oct 26, 2003 0:37:15 GMT
Here it is:    FYI Officially Richard Starkey (Ringo Starr) is TWO years older than (the real) James Paul McCartney |
|
|
|
Post by beldabeast on Oct 26, 2003 1:25:59 GMT
Here it is:  FYI Officially Richard Starkey (Ringo Starr) is TWO years older than (the real) James Paul McCartney Thanks , Sun King ! |
|
|
|
Post by Perplexed on Oct 26, 2003 4:50:49 GMT
Those pics say a lot.
Not nit-picking----just curious.
What are the realtive dates of the pics. They both look recent, say since 1999 or so. That's recent and close enough, mind you to show Ringo looking younger--but any idea on the dates?
|
|
|
|
Post by IanSingleton777 on Oct 26, 2003 16:18:16 GMT
Ringo looks great; like he's in his mid-40's! Faul looks like his crippled grampy. LOL
THE KING IS NAKED...AND WRINKLED! ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Oct 26, 2003 16:51:06 GMT
The Faul's one is just before his "last" restyling for the marriage.
The Ringo's one taken from his LAST concert!
|
|
|
|
Post by joejoe on Oct 26, 2003 17:10:08 GMT
No question Faul is older by at least 10 years. How will he be able to cover up his aging appearance over the next decade?
|
|
|
|
Post by IanSingleton777 on Oct 26, 2003 19:23:30 GMT
"Tour photos on his official page?" PLEASE don't be so naive-- any site like that, especially his OFFICIAL site, can afford to have the best and most deft computer graphics altering. Sort of like "airbrushing" and fixing photos, but much better and digital. C'mon now, you really didn't consider that first? They make dozens of computer photoshop programs whose very function is to do enhancements. THINK about what the real PROS use; which isn't for sale to the general public?  |
|
|
|
Post by IanSingleton777 on Oct 26, 2003 19:26:34 GMT
No question Faul is older by at least 10 years. How will he be able to cover up his aging appearance over the next decade? It looks asthough it's getting to the point now, oui? I imagine he'll reluctantly drop out and become a recluse, with only his young wife, their baby, and the McCartney billions for solace. Or, take a cue from Michael Jackson and start wearing a surgical mask in public, LOL ;D |
|
|
|
Post by IanSingleton777 on Oct 27, 2003 6:04:05 GMT
He's turned into the bleedin' 'Phantom of the Opera'
lol ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by Curious on Oct 27, 2003 8:53:46 GMT
A friend of mine saw Faul in concert in May, and told me he couldn't believe how old he was looking. The thick make-up was evident throughout the whole concert.
Also, if you look at footage of him during the Queen's Golden Jubilee Concert from last year (?), he really is looking much more like a man in his 70s than a man aged 60. Add to that the fact that his voice was really weak an out of tune, and he almost gave the game away there and then.
|
|
|
|
Post by Eggman on Oct 27, 2003 18:25:37 GMT
The best thing to do for Faul is took the place of some Kiss member, this way he could ends with his face and make-up problem!!!!!! ;D ;D He knows a lot about replace people!!!!;D ;D  |
|
|
|
Post by eyesbleed on Oct 27, 2003 19:17:32 GMT
Even better than Kiss makeup; he should take a que from the Residents & never go out without his mask on. THIS disquise from the 1st Residents album would work to keep his true age "under wraps"!!! He just needs to remember to put his crawfish head on before he leaves the house!  |
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Oct 28, 2003 9:05:51 GMT
A friend of mine saw Faul in concert in May, and told me he couldn't believe how old he was looking. The thick make-up was evident throughout the whole concert. As repeated many times I saw Faul in Rome on May 11th 2003. While the other members of the band sweated like pigs (it was very hot!) I couldn't see a drop of sweat on Faul's face because the tons of make-up. |
|
