|
Post by raymi46 on Oct 26, 2003 23:38:48 GMT
Has anyone ever read or heard of "The Great beatles Death Clues' by Gary Patterson? Is it biased or what? I'm bidding on it.
|
|
|
Post by raymi46 on Oct 27, 2003 0:05:15 GMT
Ok. Well, i'll keep my bid in anyway. It's pretty cheap. I talked to the girl I'm buying it off and she said it really made her wonder so i guess i'll find out.
|
|
|
Post by raymi46 on Oct 27, 2003 1:28:54 GMT
yeah, I got on there and read it.
|
|
|
Post by IanSingleton777 on Oct 27, 2003 13:37:44 GMT
Let's mince no words: Patterson doesn NOT entertain the possibility of PID for one second. His glib offhand asides which proliferate his slam of 60IF reinforce his stance. However, people cannot see with their own eyes that that guy is exploiting the PID situation for financial gain, while at the same time providing no cogent definitive conclusions. In other words, "I'll expell all this time and energy writing this book, then make fun of the very subject matter, spinning it into comic waters." He's probably on the Faul payroll. It's called 'Damage Control.' And, his arguments and critique against this 60IF site are a bit thin, too. He merely vacillitates that some forensic person says that photo comparisons should be as exact as possible ---duh; no shit. Nowhere does he catagorically state that eye distance measurements of the photos used were such-and-such distance; no where does he provide hard, tangible refutes of the 60IF visual evidence. He just rambles on in the Land of Opinion. A paper tiger.
|
|
|
Post by Darkhorse on Oct 28, 2003 2:31:56 GMT
SO true, Ian. SO true.
|
|