|
|
Post by gracemer on Nov 27, 2003 3:34:54 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by PaulBearer on Nov 27, 2003 3:42:13 GMT
Keeping in mind, of course, that at that stage, they thought they might begin to flop at any time, so the two years to retire thing was purely off the top of his head...
|
|
|
|
Post by gracemer on Nov 27, 2003 5:08:51 GMT
You may be right, but note that Paul didn't make this statement in response to a question about what he would do if The Beatles lost their popularity.
I want him to not be dead!
|
|
lennonlives
Contributor
Lennon Lives in the hearts and minds of people he's touched!
Posts: 51
|
Post by lennonlives on Nov 28, 2003 3:19:35 GMT
You may be right, but note that Paul didn't make this statement in response to a question about what he would do if The Beatles lost their popularity. I want him to not be dead! i have to say i do too, i read somewhere that someone saw a guy who looked like Paul up in the Hebredies in Scotland, but its probably just hearsay. I personally think there's a posibility that he's not dead, but then why the Paul Is Dead references? tricky indeed |
|
|
|
Post by Fwings on Nov 28, 2003 8:56:14 GMT
I want him to not be dead either.... but he is. There are lots of alternate theories, but I don't think Paul being dead is a smokescreen within a smokescreen.
Imagine if he wasn't though... what if during Faul's eventual farewell concert, he had the real James Paul step out on stage at the end, and after explaining the ruse to the stunned crowed, they'd perform the ultimate duet together. Hah, I can dream, can't I?
|
|
