|
Post by Mollymalone on Dec 18, 2003 8:47:22 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Fwings on Dec 18, 2003 11:29:46 GMT
Well, I hope that shows some people that Sun King's method of comparing photographs is legitimate.
|
|
|
Post by Piggies on Dec 18, 2003 19:40:39 GMT
QUOTE: >>> "Using a computer graphic program, the scientist marked each picture "
The key is that it says scientist (someone trained to do this type of work)
Notice how it doesn't say "Some guy with Photoshop"
|
|
|
Post by Piggies on Dec 19, 2003 0:06:04 GMT
:oPiggies - SunKing is a trained professional. I'm sure that he will speak up for himself when he reads what you wrote. He's not just SOME GUY with photoshop... SHEESH !!!! Chris I look forward to his reply. I didn't know he was trained in forensics. Thanks.
|
|
|
Post by TheWatusi on Dec 19, 2003 0:41:02 GMT
i do hope he does respond to this, youll be surprised with the results, id suppose. coincidentally enough to the saddam thing, i remember when i first got turned on to 60IF and first started talking to SunKing, saddams doubles and how they were distinguished as doubles was the main point i made to him.
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Dec 19, 2003 13:59:50 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Piggies on Dec 20, 2003 7:44:22 GMT
you should read more before you pop off comments like that and show your ignorance. *sigh* another day, another troll I've got your ignorance right here. ;D
|
|
|
Post by TotalInformation on Dec 20, 2003 8:08:21 GMT
Yes . . . if you still think those two photos line up, you are indeed again displaying your ignorance. Your blindness. Your incompetence. The extent of your brainwashing. All of the above.
|
|
|
Post by Curious on Dec 20, 2003 14:14:00 GMT
That is one of the worst crossfades I've ever seen.
Shooting yourself in the foot, Piggies.
|
|
|
Post by TheWatusi on Dec 22, 2003 1:47:42 GMT
ha, piggies that animation doesnt really help your case ;D
|
|
|
Post by Piggies on Dec 22, 2003 3:49:34 GMT
Well yes, actually, they look like they line up pretty well to me. TotalInfo, as usual, makes his point in a most inappropriate way, but if anyone else would care to explain why I am so far off here, I would appreciate it. As an aside. I have been branded as a troll here on several occasions because I have posted some things here the seem to go against the 60IF theory. The truth is, I became intrigued by this site, and it's ideas, and spent a lot of time recently looking for things that would both confirm and go against the theory presented here. Each person must, of course, decide for him/herself. So I post a picture of the man you call Faul with Ringo and George not long before Georges death. It appears to me that "Faul" does not tower over George in any way, and I am called a troll. I am searching for the truth, and have found "my truth" *(what I believe to be true)* . I have tried to the best of my ability to have an open mind, and in the end I remain unconvinced. But: I have learned a lot here in the last couple of weeks about one of my favorite group, and for that I am thankful. You may be surprised to know that I am a professional musician (guitar/vocals) whose band plays a lot of Beatles songs including: Penny Lane Got To Get You Into My Life Can't Buy Me Love A Hard Days Night Something Ticket To Ride Lady Madonna Oh Darling! and a few more. Thanks to all who have been kind here despite differing opinions. I hope for peace and a happy holiday season for you all.
|
|
|
Post by mike on Dec 22, 2003 4:08:16 GMT
Well, Piggies. I, personally don't mind skeptics. Even though it's not our job to convince you, and the links SK put explain it all, I like a different point of view every now and then. But what bothers me are troll skeptics, the kind who flame everyone who disagrees w/them. The kind who make threads like 60if.proboards21.com/index.cgi?board=document&action=display&thread=1071893714 this
|
|