|
|
Post by abbey on Mar 2, 2005 15:36:40 GMT
Paul:  Bill:  |
|
|
|
Post by Perplexed on Mar 3, 2005 10:32:23 GMT
Well, a lot is up to the photographer. You know, they say things like, "Stick your neck out. Switch with him. Move closer together. Cross your hands, don't cross your hands," on and on. The shutter clicks and then anything can happen in the dark room.
Digitally yours, P.
|
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Mar 3, 2005 15:25:15 GMT
Actually, I was trying to point out how much LONGER Bill's legs are than Paul's. I will be posting more photos to try to illustrate this. The Forum has been very buggy. I'll post things & they will disappear. It's starting to drive me nuts. Yesterday I found myself re-posting the same photos over & over again. Just now, I was trying to answer a post & when I went to modify it, first it showed the change. I went to fix something else, & it went back to what I had originally written. All I can say is AAAAAHHHHHHHH  :   |
|
|
|
Post by plastic paul on Mar 4, 2005 0:58:59 GMT
sorry to say it but it all depends on posture, particularly on where your arse is! If its back and u lean forwards, your legs are gonna look shorter than when its forwards and you lean back if u understand my meaning, but i still understand where you are coming from with those pictures.
|
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Mar 4, 2005 15:41:42 GMT
I never intended it just to be those two photos. Unfortunately, the Forum has been buggy for me the past week or so. It has been very difficult for me to post photos. Also, it's Friday & I have a hard time getting here on the weekends. I will be posting more photos showing both men sitting cross legged. Once there are enough of them, we all should be able to make a logical deduction. Ok, luv ?  |
|
|
|
Post by Red Lion on Mar 4, 2005 19:09:26 GMT
Paul: Bill: Check out how much bigger John's head is than Paul's in the first photo. In the second they are approximately equal. |
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Mar 4, 2005 19:36:26 GMT
Red Lion - very true |
|
|
|
Post by PaulBearer on Mar 5, 2005 6:28:25 GMT
That B&W photo looks like its been split in two or two parts merged together? Why is the shading different between the two parts?
|
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Mar 6, 2005 19:16:39 GMT
I believe it looks like that because it was folded at one time. Here's another photo, that I feel illustrates how much smaller Paul was than Bill is:  Still looking for more crosslegged photos... Sis |
|
|
|
Post by Nutopian on Mar 6, 2005 21:20:10 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Mar 7, 2005 0:52:47 GMT
As I have been saying, Bill's legs were much longer and in no way could he have fold himself into a chair like that. Bill would have looked and felt like a sardine. Paul fits perfectly because he was such a small man.
|
|
|
|
Post by PaulBearer on Mar 7, 2005 1:18:53 GMT
What's this? Cross-legged tripods? ;D |
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Mar 8, 2005 14:15:03 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Mar 8, 2005 14:47:26 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Mar 8, 2005 15:15:11 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Mar 8, 2005 15:30:52 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Mar 8, 2005 15:45:27 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Jul 5, 2005 16:37:59 GMT
Bumpity, bump !!!
|
|
:
Paul, for comparison.
Bill, for comparison.
