|
|
Post by abbey on Mar 8, 2005 14:56:23 GMT
  Did Bill pose this way on purpose ? Who knows ? To me, Bill's right leg appears significantly LONGER than the man in the 1st photo. Therefore, I believe wholeheartedly that the man in the 1st photo IS James Paul NOT Bill ! Sis  |
|
|
|
Post by Perplexed on Mar 9, 2005 6:57:29 GMT
Well, its the same bathroom I tell you.
Surely it's not the festfoom, with a foilet, favatory, with a findow, firror, farch, and files?
|
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Mar 9, 2005 11:30:24 GMT
You're right, it is the same bathroom. I didn't even realize it, until I was talking to my friend last night. She saw the post & pointed it out to me. We both believe that it's most likely the bathroom at Cavendish. And yes at that time, it was Faul's favatory   |
|
|
|
Post by gracemer on Mar 9, 2005 19:05:21 GMT
I can't tell for sure, but I think the first one is Paul. Wish I could see that foot better. If it was Faul, he wouldn't be standing behind that post. Or post-like object. What is that thing, anyway?
|
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Mar 10, 2005 17:16:25 GMT
Trust me, the 1st one is Paul. Look at the shape of his face. The size of his leg compared to Bill's leg. It's said that the pole was added afterwards by censors.
|
|
|
|
Post by plastic paul on Mar 11, 2005 0:39:13 GMT
Yeh faul is posing like that for a reason IMO, linda is trying to take a serious pic and faul is mocking her to put her off, she can probably see him in the reflection on the glass or something.
|
|
|
|
Post by Moped on Mar 11, 2005 4:54:57 GMT
I always thought it was some kind of post too, but now looking at it I think it's just a sliver of wall showing between two mirrors.
|
|
|
|
Post by Perplexed on Mar 11, 2005 7:51:17 GMT
I think what I see there in that photo is just a typical strip.
;D
|
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on Mar 11, 2005 9:27:36 GMT
All we know that SMA is falling in love with Billy made-up as Faul . But don't forget the meaning of that picture.  It's Billy after his baptism to be DEFINITELY Faul. The old (on the left) and the new Billy (on the right). digilander.libero.it/jamespaul/white_album_poster_front.htmlThe White Album Poster is still there. Check it out. |
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Mar 11, 2005 15:52:12 GMT
BP, the bathtub picture could be, as you say, Faul's baptism. HOWEVER, the naked picture is that of Paul.....and the second one, with clothes on, is obviously Faul because that's Linda with him. Paul was dead by the time Ms Linda came on scene, right? I would imagine a wife would be in the lavatory with her husband ;D Linda got like Yoko and would follow Bill into the bathrooms in public places. I believe it is a picture taken to imitate Paul's. Again, I state that Bill has much longer legs than Paul.
That picture of Paul with the line blocking his privates from view is JAMES PAUL MCCARTNEY. It is obvious it is the same bathroom. Look closely.....it is all the same layout. One of the 'rewards' that Bill received was the house on Cavendish, the furniture, the cars, etc. Wonder if there is any way to find out if "Paul" gave away a bunch of clothes around that time? That is one thing Bill couldn't use becaue of his being so much bigger in all ways than Paul was.
Bill and Linda trashed that beautiful house. They let the backyard become an overgrown weed garden; let their animals urinated and defecate on the Oriental rugs...they didn't think it was NATURAL to house train animals. What pigs!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by byrdsmaniac on Mar 12, 2005 1:19:43 GMT
SMA = Sister Mary Abbey = Jane Asher? Linda?
|
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Mar 14, 2005 15:44:43 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Jul 5, 2005 16:40:46 GMT
Bumpity, bump !!!
|
|
|
|
Post by semolinapilchard on Jul 19, 2005 17:34:58 GMT
Still talkin' about schweens...
|
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Jul 19, 2005 19:52:37 GMT
Well at least we show he had one! And upon closer observation, Paul had a heavy line of hair running down the inside of thighs; however, to matter how many pictures you see of Bill, there is NEVER that hairy line of hair.
Now that we have established Paul was a Paul......let's try to figure out how and why he was mureder
|
|
|
|
Post by The Taxman on Jul 19, 2005 20:42:12 GMT
What's a "schween"? Yes, Paul was definitely murdered and there is something, somewhere that was written on this by a figure of some authority...police detective, doctor, family member, etc...I am running a series of interviews with some folks in Briton concerning this, and will let you folks here know what I come up with. Fear not, I will NOT report if someone simply says "nonsense" to the whole subject, since we all ready know that there are those ahead of us who have made sure that the whole idea had to be made into folly for it to succeed. SMA...once again, good work.
|
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Jul 20, 2005 13:47:57 GMT
Thank you, Taxman. Please reserve a copy of your book for me....an autographed one.
And thank YOU for doing the interviews. One would think that after all this time and even Ms Asher, who is an authoress, could write something that would be close enough to the truth, but label it fiction to protect the innocent.
|
|
Nope !
