|
|
Post by Eggman on Nov 3, 2003 14:00:25 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Imgonnaopenmymind on Nov 4, 2003 2:02:39 GMT
Dunno...looks more like women's lingerie than a dark diaper.
|
|
|
|
Post by LongJohn on Nov 4, 2003 16:17:36 GMT
stupid question coming... i've seen many pictures of paul wearing glasses, did he need to use them? do we know how much myopia he had?? and by the way... i don't think it's women's ligerie... it has a white elastic band or elastic waist that can't be seen properly, and that's why it looks so weird...  |
|
|
|
Post by RitaLolo on Nov 7, 2003 9:09:31 GMT
I think that on this photo Paul does only s'amuser!!!!  Which guy never has to try women's lingerie!!! when to the glasses yes it had to have a problem of eyes. That says well seen nonetheless! !!! |
|
|
|
Post by Eggman on Nov 7, 2003 14:31:42 GMT
Well........... I never tried with women's lingerie ;D |
|
|
|
Post by MotherNaureSon on Nov 7, 2003 17:26:46 GMT
Neither have I !
|
|
|
|
Post by zoona on Nov 11, 2003 17:09:41 GMT
They look to me like they r just dressing up to go out to a party.
|
|
|
|
Post by Imgonnaopenmymind on Nov 20, 2003 23:08:53 GMT
Definitely a pair of pantyhose.
|
|
|
|
Post by Eggman on Nov 21, 2003 18:42:36 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Nov 22, 2003 1:02:22 GMT
;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by PaulBearer on Nov 22, 2003 5:08:52 GMT
He is the L'eggsman! ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by Eggman on Nov 22, 2003 16:19:31 GMT
I still can't believe it.........  ;D |
|
|
|
Post by Perplexed on Nov 22, 2003 20:35:02 GMT
Well, to their credit, (I suppose), they look terribly awkward in women's clothes...........
|
|
|
|
Post by Chris on Dec 3, 2003 16:05:06 GMT
 Right now, I've been trying to determine how bad Paul's eyes were. I think that he did have severe myopia. He was VERY near-sighted. Here's a photo of him wearing black prescription glasses. He looks like they're comfortable for his eyes. They look pretty thick, too. He does look unhappy about his photo being taken wearing them, though. I don't hink he wanted anyone to know that he needed glasses !!! Back then, if you needed thick lenses you had no choice but to go with the black frames. The only other choice was wire frames. Wire frams only worked with lighter lenses. The lenses were made of glass. The thicker they were, the heavier they were. The lenses in these black frames look PRETTY thick...Here's the photo:  Love to all... Chris ;D 
|
|
|
|
Post by Chris on Dec 3, 2003 16:14:16 GMT
;DHere's another photo. In this one, Paul is reading a fan letter. He has that letter RIGHT in front of his face. I would have to do that, if I was trying to read something without my glasses on. My vision is atrocious. I'm legally blind without my glasses on !!! Here goes:  I have a few more photos to try to illustrate my point. I'll be posting them after this... Love to all... Chris ;D |
|
|
|
Post by Chris on Dec 3, 2003 16:20:03 GMT
;DHere's a photo of " The boys " hanging out on some steps. They're all reading. Paul is reading his passport. He has it right in front of his face. Again, at the distance of someone who is very near-sighted. Here goes:  I think I have one more to share. I have to look ;D Love to all... Chris ;D |
|
|
|
Post by Chris on Dec 3, 2003 16:27:02 GMT
;D :oThis one is different. This time, Paul has the newspaper at a distance from himself. However, he looks uncomfortable. His eyes have an unnatural gleam to them. I believe he was wearing contact lenses that day. Most probably glass ones. I don't think that plastic ones existed yet. The glass ones can be very uncomfortable. This might account for the look of consternation on his face !!! Here goes :  I might have one or two more. I have to look ;D Love to all... Chris ;D |
|
|
|
Post by Chris on Dec 3, 2003 16:47:10 GMT
;D Here's a photo taken during the Revolver sessions. It looks to me like Paul is wearing prescription sunglasses. Here goes:  Black frames & tinted lenses. I know that he had access to much nicer looking frames. What else could they be  ;D Love to all... Chris ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by JamesPaul & Brian on Dec 6, 2003 12:22:32 GMT
I had astigmatism. Definitely. |
|
|
|
Post by Chris on Dec 7, 2003 11:03:54 GMT
:DThanks J.P. I also have astigmatism... Chris
|
|
|
|
Post by Perplexed on Jun 11, 2006 9:15:40 GMT
Well, all things being equal, after all these years of "research", we never came to the bottom of this jewel of a photograph. Perhaps it is just as well. Who knows. Some will say "What a Drag" , but that is a defensible view. I say this photograph informs us of a transi- tional period. |
|
|
|
Post by Paulythene Paul on Jul 8, 2006 17:05:39 GMT
Well, all things being equal, after all these years of "research", we never came to the bottom of this jewel of a photograph. Perhaps it is just as well. Who knows. Some will say "What a Drag" , but that is a defensible view. I say this photograph informs us of a transi- tional period. I agree, Doc. I think that in the above photograph, John is going through some sort of weird bonding ritual with this man:  |
|
|
|
Post by byrdsmaniac on Jul 8, 2006 21:02:44 GMT
Well I think they were auditioning to be in the Rockettes' Christmas Show at Radio City Music Hall. Hence the "rock-et" on John(?)'s shirt.  (Or is that just "a really big shoe"?)  |
|
|
|
Post by plastic paul on Jul 9, 2006 2:39:00 GMT
Are they wearing coonskin caps?
|
|
|
|
Post by byrdsmaniac on Jul 9, 2006 2:48:17 GMT
|
|
;D
