|
Post by SunKing on Apr 24, 2004 13:53:53 GMT
Billy, This photo: Does not match this one: Which to me proves that they are two different individuals ...and... ...just another forensic procedure..... ...it's my job...
|
|
|
Post by BillyJones on Apr 24, 2004 17:28:01 GMT
Rojopa & S.K. - if anyone were shown those two photos without a name on them they would be taken AS two different people. It's like I keep saying - Faul really does not look exactly like Paul. He resembles him as if they were related in some way. They do NOT look identical to each other!
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Apr 25, 2004 17:39:17 GMT
Then there's the difference in their noses. There's more to this than meets the eye Here's more photos of Faul, from MMT: A photo of Paul showing his right ear to compare the last photos to. There are three photos in a row of Faul's right ear. So I give you three photos of Paul showing HIS right ear: There is NO way that is the same ear! Here's another photo of Paul's right ear, to show that the last photo is NOT a fluke! The photo right before this was taken from a VINTAGE document. It was in an earlier post from a previous member of this Forum! There is NO way the right ear of Faul in the photos of him from MMT, match Paul's right ear in the three photos of him! Now, I expect the naysayers to say: Well maybe Paul had his ears pinned back around the time of MMT. He DID have pretty big ears! That's a valid observation. However, if that is the case WHY did Paul/Faul later unpin them?! For what purpose?! Check THIS out: I can just keep posting photos showing how Faul had his ears made BIGGER . WHY? What possible LOGICAL reason could he have to do this? There IS none! Again, Faul in 1967, smaller ears: Paul, almost exact same position of head. This photo was taken 1965 or 66: Paul's earlobe is hanging. Faul's is NOT! Faul's earlobes were attached in this photo from 1967 & the other photos of him from MMT. WHY would he UNATTACH them LATER ON! I totally doubt anyone would have surgery to UNATTACH their earlobes. The ONLY logical explanation I can think of is that Faul had his ears made bigger to make himself look MORE like the pre- 1967 Paul McCartney! Can you see "something strange" behind Faul's sideburn? About Faul's ears and nose tip prostheses, VERY PROBABLY the make-up artist Stuart Freeborn was involved. There was a "hole" on 1966-1967 in his career...
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Apr 25, 2004 18:16:58 GMT
Unless I seriously need new glasses, I see a "crack" behind the sideburns. I don't think most people have a crack or line between ear and jaw!!
It seems he is wearing his plasticine ear over his real ear.
Good job, as usual, Sun King!
|
|
|
Post by BillyJones on Apr 25, 2004 21:41:19 GMT
:oAll I have to say S.K. is WOW !GREAT job! ;D
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Apr 25, 2004 22:04:44 GMT
:oAll I have to say S.K. is WOW !GREAT job! ;D Thank You! And do you remeber James Paul's true profile?
|
|
|
Post by BillyJones on Apr 25, 2004 22:38:10 GMT
It doesn't look like the same person to me!
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Apr 25, 2004 23:37:41 GMT
It doesn't look like the same person to me! Take a look at nose tip...
|
|
|
Post by BillyJones on Apr 29, 2004 16:48:25 GMT
I see what you mean. Thanks S.K.
|
|
|
Post by Sdxo lv Ghdg on May 4, 2004 3:16:04 GMT
Look at Faul's left eye on the McCartney II cover. Oh yeah! The white doesn't come to a point on the inside. It looks phoney.
|
|
|
Post by BillyJones on May 4, 2004 16:27:57 GMT
He's right!
|
|
|
Post by abbey on May 5, 2004 4:55:08 GMT
Look at Faul's left eye on the McCartney II cover. The white doesn't come to a point on the inside. It looks phoney. You are absolutely right, Sdxo Iv Ghdg. Welcome, aboard. I would never have noticed that. You have earned my Sherlock Holmes' hat and magnifying glass
|
|
|
Post by Elidor on May 5, 2004 10:42:58 GMT
Go on - someone please do a cross fade of the McCartney II album cover (get the album, folks. Whimsical stuff, and I love most of it) with the "speak no evil shot"
|
|
|
Post by BillyJones on May 5, 2004 13:36:31 GMT
Elidor - I can't do a cross fade. I can post them one after the other though. Here goes: Faul in McCartney II: Now Paul in Speak No Evil: It's so strange. They have a similar expression on their faces. However, their eyes are SO different from each other. I don't just mean the color, either! Their head shapes are different, as is the shape of their noses! I think their ear shapes are also different, but it's hard to tell.
|
|
|
Post by abbey on May 5, 2004 19:49:02 GMT
Thank you, Billy. You can certainly tell by looking at those two pictures that they are two very different guys. I truly appreciate all the hard work you've put in with your photos. ;D
|
|
|
Post by Perplexed on May 6, 2004 1:03:59 GMT
9 months ago we were comparing apples and oranges. Now, it is nectarines, tangerines, tangelos, Granny Smiths, Washington Reds, Peaches, and an occassional Grapefruit. Soooooohhhh, let's make Ambrosia! ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by abbey on May 6, 2004 14:05:23 GMT
9 months ago we were comparing apples and oranges. Now, it is nectarines, tangerines, tangelos, Granny Smiths, Washington Reds, Peaches, and an occassional Grapefruit. Soooooohhhh, let's make Ambrosia! ;D ;D No, Grapefruit would be John But I do like your idea of Ambrosia. Sounds yummy. Could you deliver a plateful for lunch?
|
|
|
Post by BillyJones on May 6, 2004 14:52:27 GMT
Same here - YUM! ;D Perplexed you are so eloquent. You're also very right. We've gone from the basics to picking out the different facets of these two individuals. Upon looking at the Speak No Evil photo of Paul, I realized that it's a great shot of the back of his left hand! If you look closely, you can also see the hair on his hands! Now I have to dig up a photo clearly showing the back of Faul's left hand. Bing cherries compared to marachino ;D Stay tuned, I'll post the comparison here!
Hold the presses. These photos all show that Paul had longer more slender fingers than Faul. This warrants a new thread. Please go to Clues. I will be starting a new thread there concerning the differences between the hands of the two men. First left hand, then right hand!
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Jan 12, 2005 16:55:13 GMT
Bumpity bump ! ;D
|
|
|
Post by Moped on May 23, 2005 16:38:22 GMT
...and this one is the very last one.... Good work, BJ! Thought I'd put them together.
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on May 23, 2005 16:43:21 GMT
Thought I'd put them together. Thank You Moped! Yes... Ringo seemed to be really Paul's body guard... Why Ringo was there? The Award was for James Paul McCartney as composer....
|
|
|
Post by abbey on May 23, 2005 16:55:56 GMT
|
|
|
Post by TPIMaster on May 23, 2005 17:33:02 GMT
Paul's mouth looks a bit like it's been doctored to match Faul's...
|
|
|
Post by cavendish on May 23, 2005 20:14:31 GMT
Good questions all. Why WAS Ritchie there ? I'm sure that Paul thought he had come along to keep him company. Since we now know he was NO friend of Paul's... Why was Ritchie REALLY there ?
|
|
|
Post by byrdsmaniac on May 23, 2005 22:02:18 GMT
Since we now know he was NO friend of Paul's... Why was Ritchie REALLY there ? Whoa! I think that statement really is over the top. Did I miss something? I know there's been some speculation on the site about Ringo being some sort of agent, but c'mon. What next? John always hated Paul? A case hasn't been made against Ringo, and I doubt that it can be.
|
|