|
Post by byrdsmaniac on May 24, 2005 0:06:03 GMT
Paul's mouth looks a bit like it's been doctored to match Faul's... Oh please. That's absurd.
|
|
|
Post by goldberry on May 24, 2005 0:55:00 GMT
it's getting sillier by the day!
|
|
|
Post by ReallyReallyDead on May 24, 2005 2:21:06 GMT
Here's more photos of Faul, from MMT: It looks to me like he wasn't wearing the fake ears in these two photos. My guess? They were uncomfortable, so he would only wear them when he was told to! More photos of EARLY Faul, from MMT. That movie is a GOLDMINE. In none of theses photos was he wearing the fake ears!: are there any copies of these images in a higher quality? I would like to make a comparison or something.
|
|
|
Post by cavendish on May 24, 2005 15:55:52 GMT
Ritchie is guilty of something. For as long as I can remember, Ritchie has been wearing dark glasses. He's hiding alright. From whom ? From what ?
|
|
|
Post by goldberry on May 24, 2005 16:18:43 GMT
He's hiding alright. From whom ? From what ? you perhaps!
|
|
madtitan125
Contributor
"There is no knowledge that is not power!"
Posts: 126
|
Post by madtitan125 on May 24, 2005 17:41:44 GMT
Thanks ReallyReallyDead,
Let's get back to examining the evidence......................
A person's inner ear cartilage can not change!
This, just as a person's ears can not navigate themselves into different positions on a person's head.
So, unless James Paul started wearing fake ear covers (see A Day In The Life videoclip stills) to disguise his own genuine ears, we have a deception here on our hands!
|
|
|
Post by defhermit on May 24, 2005 20:33:31 GMT
A person's inner ear cartilage can not change! It can't? I thought that the cartilage in a person's ears and nose DID grow constantly throughout a person's life and that is why as you get older your nose and your ears continue to grow.
|
|
|
Post by goldberry on May 25, 2005 1:22:23 GMT
It can't? I thought that the cartilage in a person's ears and nose DID grow constantly throughout a person's life and that is why as you get older your nose and your ears continue to grow. I'm under the same impression!
|
|
|
Post by gracemer on May 27, 2005 6:44:45 GMT
The tip of the nose keeps growing. The earlobes start hanging. The shape of the cartilage in the ear does not change.
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on May 27, 2005 12:42:07 GMT
It can't? I thought that the cartilage in a person's ears and nose DID grow constantly throughout a person's life and that is why as you get older your nose and your ears continue to grow. I'm under the same impression! Many people are under that impression that our ears and nose get bigger throughout life because they are made of cartilage, which continues to grow after our bones have stopped. While this is true of the cartilage in fish that lack a bone skeleton, such as sharks, the expert at the MadSci network says it's simply not true for humans and other animals with a bone skeleton. from: ask.yahoo.com/ask/20041229.htmlIt's an old old thread....
|
|
|
Post by TPIMaster on May 27, 2005 15:16:14 GMT
Paul's mouth looks a bit like it's been doctored to match Faul's... Oh please. That's absurd. Nothing is absurd. The sides of Paul's upper lip always went up when he smiled while Faul's didn't. Check every pic of Paul and Faul smiling
|
|
|
Post by defhermit on May 27, 2005 16:37:55 GMT
I'm under the same impression! Many people are under that impression that our ears and nose get bigger throughout life because they are made of cartilage, which continues to grow after our bones have stopped. While this is true of the cartilage in fish that lack a bone skeleton, such as sharks, the expert at the MadSci network says it's simply not true for humans and other animals with a bone skeleton. from: ask.yahoo.com/ask/20041229.htmlIt's an old old thread.... Yeah, but the link you just provided, while debunking the myth that ears and noses get larger because of growing cartilage, goes on to profess mystification as to why the ears and noses DO in fact keep growing. They debunked that the CAUSE is from cartilage growing. Not the fact that they DO grow. And just cause Newsweek got the Pentagon confirmation wrong doesn't mean that the Koran wasn't flushed.
|
|
|
Post by cavendish on May 27, 2005 20:41:39 GMT
What madtitan & gracemer wrote sounds about right.
|
|
madtitan125
Contributor
"There is no knowledge that is not power!"
Posts: 126
|
Post by madtitan125 on May 28, 2005 9:27:51 GMT
Thanks Cavendish.
I never disputed that the cartilage in the nose and ears grows. If something is alive, it probably grows.
What I'm saying is this:
The cartilage in the ear can not change shape and/or design. A person's ears can not position themselves into different spots on a person's head, either.
Please see the stills taken from MMT reference.
|
|
|
Post by defhermit on May 28, 2005 16:44:58 GMT
Mad, I don't know if you are right or not. It just seems to me that if something can grow, than different areas of it COULD grow at different speeds, causing things to shift around.
Doesn't that sound right to you? I didn't know quite what pics you wanted me to look at...
|
|
madtitan125
Contributor
"There is no knowledge that is not power!"
Posts: 126
|
Post by madtitan125 on May 29, 2005 4:19:31 GMT
I did a little quick snooping around the net and found this website: Subject: Ive heard 'Ears and nose do not ever stop growing.' Is this true www.madsci.org/posts/archives/Mar2003/1048719208.Dv.r.html"The size of the ear canal does not increase with age (Liu TC. Chen YS. Aging and external ear resonance. Audiol. 39(5):235-7, 2000.) The ear canal is defined by skin and cartilage as well as bone. That suggests that there is no overall ear cartilage growth in adulthood." I believe that way back in the day, there was a thread on this site re: this topic. If I remember correctly, forensic experts use the design of the inside ear cartilage as an identification marker, that it should never change. Not only that. There is also the smoking gun evidence re: the attached and detached earlobes. And Paul's slope-oriented nose compared with Faul's hook-shaped nose, etc. I believe there a pic of Faul, Linda and Ringo backstage where Faul has no left ear at all.
|
|
|
Post by defhermit on May 29, 2005 8:25:03 GMT
no left ear at all???
|
|
madtitan125
Contributor
"There is no knowledge that is not power!"
Posts: 126
|
Post by madtitan125 on May 29, 2005 10:01:20 GMT
Nothing.
The afforementioned pic shows a clear shot of his profile, Faul facing the left of the photo. From all the times we have seen different inner ear cartilage, ears pinned back, ears extended, etc. I thought we already determined this guy is wearing prosthetics.
This photo was posted not too long ago with the caption "No Comment." If anyone knows in which thread that pic is, please let us know. It's in here somewhere! Sam
|
|
|
Post by ReallyReallyDead on May 29, 2005 11:37:44 GMT
|
|
madtitan125
Contributor
"There is no knowledge that is not power!"
Posts: 126
|
Post by madtitan125 on May 29, 2005 12:41:06 GMT
There it is!
Or is it "there it isn't!"? Not only is poor Paul really, really dead, so are Faul's poor ears.
Thanks ReallyReallyDead.
|
|
|
Post by goldberry on May 29, 2005 12:50:46 GMT
lol.. too funny! Like he doesn't have ears! I know Van Gogh cut of his ear.. but as far as I'm aware, it's not common practice!
|
|
madtitan125
Contributor
"There is no knowledge that is not power!"
Posts: 126
|
Post by madtitan125 on May 29, 2005 15:03:06 GMT
For a good shot of Faul's prosthetic ear, please refer to Subject: Essential Threads, Thread: Billy (Shepherd) Pepper 35 Years After.
See photo #13 on back cover of Driving Rain CD. Here, you get a clear view of said prosthetic ear. The nub of the ear, located on outside of canal is Bill's, but the rest is just an attachment to Bill's much-operated on head.
These particular fake ears are more than likely held in place by the titanium and magnets Bill sang about on the "Venus and Mars" LP. I think the fake ears he used previously were probably slip ons?
Well, it's like George once, said: "I'm sorry for your aging head, but like you heard me said, I'm not guilty."
|
|
|
Post by goldberry on May 29, 2005 15:29:40 GMT
err.. I don't see a prosthetic ear.
|
|
madtitan125
Contributor
"There is no knowledge that is not power!"
Posts: 126
|
Post by madtitan125 on May 29, 2005 19:06:06 GMT
Your kidding, right? The "ear" on that cover ear is el plastico. Muy plastico.
The back cover of the Driving Rain CD is almost like a mini-White Album. For such a clandestine operation, there sure seemed to be a lot of people involved not content with what is happening.
Hard to believe this more or less has been kept under wraps all this time, when it seems like everyone involved was trying their best to uncover it without being bumped off. Another testament to man's lack of awareness. The people behind this probably couldn't believe the amount of success they were having with this deception.
Not sure what year Faul went to the snap-on prosthetics and actually had his original ears shaved off his head, but his ears did all of a sudden have the exact cartilage design as Paul's ears. Unfortunately, we can't say that they always have.
Where, oh where, is that photo of the other prosthetic (ear covering?) that didn't have an ear canal?
I think Faul was using ear coverings, at least up until the video of A Day In The Life. That videoclip is also ANOTHER mini-White Album in its own right.
|
|
|
Post by McGarrett-Five-0 on May 29, 2005 22:57:49 GMT
I found the picture of Bill interesting. Something caught my attention.Look at the area in ear area. It runs straight across and it looks like words that might have been covered over. So, I took the photo and transferred it to Picasa2, which is a great program free from Google. I loaded the picture onto the clipboard and clicked on "sharpen". Each time you click, it gets sharper. I could not make out what these words might be or if they ever were words. I can tell you the picture has been doctored by the application of black around the ear area. I can't tell you if the black line alongside his sideburn is doctored,but something is very strange about the hair in that area. I even slid the highlighter all the way up. Again, you can see the picture has been messed with in some way
|
|