|
|
Post by SunKing on Jun 17, 2004 15:46:38 GMT
  THE SAME SCENE |
|
|
|
Post by PaulBearer on Jun 17, 2004 17:20:32 GMT
Could "Welcome the Rolling Stones" mean "Welcome to the club - now you've had a group member replaced too!"?
Was late 66 a time for the illuminati to swoop down on groups and control them big time? Those music groups were too powerful and influential to be left alone...they had to be stopped...
|
|
|
|
Post by BillyJones on Jun 17, 2004 18:02:34 GMT
Maybe. I wouldn't be surprised  |
|
|
|
Post by LUCY on Jun 17, 2004 20:35:12 GMT
Three LOVE beads dangling between the dolls legs? A personal Brian Jones momento? ( he was pretty fond of jewelery)
|
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Jun 17, 2004 20:58:20 GMT
Could "Welcome the Rolling Stones" mean "Welcome to the club - now you've had a group member replaced too!"? Was late 66 a time for the illuminati to swoop down on groups and control them big time? Those music groups were too powerful and influential to be left alone...they had to be stopped... Yes...killing or making kill the two geniuses... |
|
|
|
Post by unrepentant on Jun 18, 2004 2:31:47 GMT
that seated figure on LP cover there is strongly suggestive of brian jones, isn't it.....
let's devote more time to what the cover might mean, allright?
|
|
|
|
Post by PaulBearer on Jun 18, 2004 12:31:42 GMT
I suppose they'll be clues in The Rolling Stones albums then as well...did they drop the "The" from their name also? Don't know much about them and don't really know the album covers.
|
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Jun 18, 2004 14:01:48 GMT
Did they drop the name The Rolling Stones to become just The Stones? Like PB, I am not that familiar with the Stones album covers. Though I do like some of their music, I have never thought to listen for clues.
|
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Jun 19, 2004 7:36:45 GMT
I suppose they'll be clues in The Rolling Stones albums then as well...did they drop the "The" from their name also? Don't know much about them and don't really know the album covers. The same here.....but I am reading biographies now about Brian Jones... All the drug problems about Brian started on 1967 with his "alienation" from group..... Just like another story.......Can you say which one? |
|
|
|
Post by BillyJones on Jun 19, 2004 13:55:36 GMT
:oCould it be because he didn't want to go along with keeping quiet about what happened to Paul?!
|
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Jun 19, 2004 22:25:12 GMT
The same here.....but I am reading biographies now about Brian Jones... All the drug problems about Brian started on 1967 with his "alienation" from group..... Just like another story.......Can you say which one? SK, it sounds rather like what happened to John. Of course, Faul has gone on and on about how depressed he was with the break up of the Beatles that he was drinking heavily, etc. Of course, we know how much h*ll John and George went through after the murdering of Paul. |
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Jun 20, 2004 0:04:29 GMT
I was tellling the "probably" Frian Fones had THE SAME Faul's agenda....
|
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Jun 20, 2004 2:59:22 GMT
Ok, SK, you are correct, as usual. I wasn't looking at it in the proper light.
I can't help but feel sorry for John. The man's life was messed up enough and then to have his best and closest friend viciously murdered, put the poor guy over the edge.
|
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Jun 20, 2004 11:33:36 GMT
I can't help but feel sorry for John. The man's life was messed up enough and then to have his best and closest friend viciously murdered, put the poor guy over the edge. Yes and if you notice.....60IF is about what John did.... |
|
