|
|
Post by Perplexed on May 29, 2005 17:02:09 GMT
  Shades of Don King! I thought Phil's courtroom coiffure might bear some discussion. Time to call in Vidal Sassoon for some counseling. Maybe the defense could comb the evidence more thouroughly....... With any luck, the presiding judge in this case will give him an unbiased hairing. |
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on May 29, 2005 20:19:18 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by defhermit on May 29, 2005 23:36:02 GMT
What was that post a little while ago that pointed out the dates of Phil Spector's "going into seclusion" and how they kind of sync'ed up with beatles-related events?
That's definitely Phil Spector in the pic with the hair, it looks just like an aged version of the pics you linked to BP...
the wig? I say he's probably trying to convince the judge he's unbalanced...
|
|
|
|
Post by Perplexed on May 30, 2005 0:52:27 GMT
yep, that's Phil boy allright.
Has to be a wig------that straight, fine, limp hair in picture no.2 of BeatlePaul's could not possibly grow out to such body. Giving a perm will add body, and some illusion of "density", but, wow, any pro hair stylist can see there that the cajones outnumber the Faullicles.
I agree def, its a "plea of wacky" to the judge, etc. "Hair ye, hair ye, court is now in session."
Spector's eccentricity continues to be his mane problem.
|
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on May 31, 2005 10:11:23 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by peoplescommittee on Jun 4, 2005 19:21:35 GMT
Well, define "some people" -- right now, no one buys the idea.
|
|
Dr.No
Contributor
Posts: 177
|
Post by Dr.No on Jun 5, 2005 0:53:36 GMT
anyone following the case knows thats Phil. And anyone who knows Phil isn's supprised by the hair.
|
|
|
|
Post by defhermit on Jun 5, 2005 20:19:17 GMT
Phil has worn wigs since the 70's
|
|
