|
Post by daveyo on Jun 13, 2009 3:08:43 GMT
Hi folks Yes there is such a person named Peter James McKilroy and this person was dead in September of 1966 and the burial ground is at Highgate Cemetary about 0.7 miles from the town of Crouch End. Now we just need a person to physically take a trip over there and find that grave and verify officially with a photo showing that spot and the marker as well and post it here. If this is true and as far as I can tell from my research here, we may have hit the jackpot where the real Paul McCartney is buried at officially. To my understanding as told it is a fake name but someone else is buried there. They would not tell me. Now why is that they could not tell me? Somebody with big name is, and who else would it be coming from the witness who made a statement here. We are getting close. Now who will ask to get it exhumed to verify the remains of that person. Daveyo
|
|
|
Post by dmystified on May 31, 2011 4:57:04 GMT
Am just wondering what might have happened to this possible endeavor, and the discussion thereof. Anyone ever follow up on the lead, or did this get started in another thread?
I'm also wondering why a cemetary would accept someone under a ficticious name, etc, and who was the person who made the funeral arrangements? Wouldn't there be some kind of records to know if George and Ringo had been there for services?
|
|
beacon
Contributor
http://beaconfilms2011.blogspot.com/
Posts: 79
|
Post by beacon on Nov 8, 2011 14:46:10 GMT
What is the story here? I am in London and could check this out if need be. Incidentally, Highgate Cemetery is where Karl Marx is buried.
|
|
|
Post by beatlesfan on Dec 26, 2011 0:55:16 GMT
What is the story here? I am in London and could check this out if need be. Incidentally, Highgate Cemetery is where Karl Marx is buried. Hi Beacon, I've heard that Paul was buried in Blackpool
|
|
beacon
Contributor
http://beaconfilms2011.blogspot.com/
Posts: 79
|
Post by beacon on Jan 6, 2012 11:28:21 GMT
I have never heard that story, can you tell us more?
|
|
|
Post by lexdyksic on Mar 10, 2012 7:33:50 GMT
I am confused (not an unusual phenomenon for me!), but, having read all the "evidence", there are multiples of virtually everything. The photo work is most telling however, the "60IF" stuff leaves me cold (sorry!). Unless I'm missing the point (which is possible I suppose), parts of it are simply implausible. We have the car wreck in England. We have the phone call to Ringo. We have a taxi. Suddenly we're in France. We have stranded Paul, wandering Paul and dead Paul. We have a body washed ashore (I think), from where? A plane? We have Brian with Paul (in the plane?). We have damage as "if from a great height". We have John in lasting search for the KKK? That's the most implausible of all. The KKK while once a large organization in the 1920's was a small organization in the 1960's made up of people who would be lucky to be able to find and airport and be able to fly unaccompanied. Outside of drinking a lot of beer and driving pickup trucks in the deep South and terrorizing negroes, they weren't exactly a world-class espionage outfit. Secondly, if it was Brian who is the alleged target, I can think of many Jews who were a lot closer to home and more likely targets for that bunch. I don't want to start a fight with anyone over this but that is a very strange tale, indeed. That brings me to the burial site. Again, we have everything from London to Greek Isles. I believe that something happened here. I know that it is possible to cover up a lot of sins, especially with money and connections. There are limits, though. Considering that the paparazzi watched the Beatles night and day, it must have taken quite a ruse just to go somewhere unaccompanied. Meeting in France, or a graveyard, or anywhere else for that matter would certainly bring unwanted attention. There are references to the police calling them to identify the body. That seems a bit strange as well. I too am trying to piece this all together. The "60IF" document is said to be the product of George Harrison. We all know that George dabbled in Eastern religion. I rather think that is the basis for the bit about telling this to an "Easterner". Why? There is no harm in speculation, but it certainly can't be "all of the above". In my opinion the really valuable clues get side tracked by theories that are unlikely on their face. Am I missing something? Am I missing a lot?
|
|
beacon
Contributor
http://beaconfilms2011.blogspot.com/
Posts: 79
|
Post by beacon on Mar 12, 2012 9:27:30 GMT
I agree. 60if seems totally unrealsistic and there seems to be nothing to back it up. I am for wild speculation but without any evidence it just becomes the ramblings of a crazy person.
|
|