|
|
Post by gimmeabreak on Jan 9, 2011 17:02:48 GMT
I love a good conspiracy theory. When there's reason to.
How does a bogus (yet intriguing) rumour from a period in the 60s get carried this far?
What is your purpose? To secretly fool the small minded, gaining nothing in return?
I don't get it.
All the 'proof' is just pictures of Paul McCartney.
I came to this site with an open mind and would still have an open mind, but if pictures of Paul McCartney posted with made up self-conclusions about (non) differences in eyelines, ears, mouth etc etc is all you've got, then CASE CLOSED for me... Paul is alive, dur.
Discuss/Retort/Flame On/Prove me wrong/Vent Away...
|
|
|
|
Post by romanruins on Jan 10, 2011 9:32:40 GMT
gimmeabreak,
1.) your post shows that you can't critique whatever it is you have read here in a Edifying manner.
2.) Or come up with a plan to survey a site that has Total Topics of 3,078, and Total Posts of 39,242 as of now.
3.) That you like Richardgrick, and traff26, and a small number of posters who come thru have a childish pose of self importance.
One of the most basic facts that escape you is there are mutual conflicting ideas as to what happened to The Beatles in the Fall of 1966 presented in the around 7 years this site has been up. If you are smarter than us show us. Contribute something of value other than Your and Richardgrick's TIRED DRIBBLE OF EMOTION AND THAT WE SHOULD MEET WITH YOUR APPROVAL on this WWW SITE. The evidence of that is the posts that you offer idiots!
Posters have presented evidence of conflicting theories, and a lot has been Proved & Disproved by the work of individuals EXPLORING the subject, and facets of it. They have come from a wide range of experience, and expertise, and have provided this site with an educational experience for others, and Each Other who have the sense to realize that the Fields of Music, Science, and Society are being EXPLORED, and Discussed as their schedule's allow.
If your tired put your head down and rest, then find other AMUSEMENTS for yourselves some where else.
Ruins
|
|
|
|
Post by gimmeabreak on Jan 10, 2011 23:04:43 GMT
romanruins:
Firstly, you come across as trying to sound intelligent (hopefully adding to your cause) and painting me as someone who has come on here and basically called you all retarded in a childish manner. I have not. But whatever floats your boat.
1) What's to critique? As i stated, all the 'proof' is in my opinion pictures of one Paul McCartney. Of The Beatles & Wings. The same man who was born Paul McCartney is the same man you now refer to as fake Paul.
2) I've read the main topics. The ones listed as the be all, end all. Pictures of Paul and his ears and lips and hair and neck and jawline is all i found.
3) Self-Importance? Pot Kettle Black much? I only want to know why you're believers of a theory that Paul is dead, while showing up 'proof' that is at best laughable.
Contribute something of value? What would be the point? I'd point you to Paul websites or videos of his appearances since 1966, and you'd say it's fake Paul. It's up to YOU to prove it bud. I'm not the one coming up with ridiculous theories without one shred of evidence, without one ounce of proof.
You can try and use the jedi mind trick or try and divert attention away with attempted snappy comments and big words telling me i'm just an idiot flamer passing through to cause trouble but it won't work on me.
As i said, it's up to YOU to prove these pigs of yours do fly. I'll be interested in seeing what route you take....evidence or smart-arse.
|
|
|
|
Post by romanruins on Jan 11, 2011 7:24:24 GMT
gimmeabreak,
Your problem is thinking People can read your posts here gimmeabreak, and anybody Else's and see what describes a situation factually. Its not you, and me arguing, and trying to dominate each other. Nobody has to answer you on this Thread you've started or anywhere else about anything.
1.) Its self evident in making your attack/critique that you don't want to deal in specifics.
2.) That you are basically dishonest and self-absorbed "To secretly fool the small minded"... "painting me as someone who has come on here and basically called you all retarded in a childish manner. I have not." "...while showing up "proof" that is at best laughable",,, etc etc . Without making an attempt to demonstrate a specific example. Nobody agrees with everything here or posted. Its an internet site!
3.) The reason for 1 and 2 is you want the site to be about You as much as possible for as long as possible as a thrill. Like others of the same vane. Readers can simply read your posts and make up their own minds.
"and use the jedi mind trick" says it all.
Ruins
|
|
|
|
Post by romanruins on Jan 11, 2011 7:30:03 GMT
Viewers new to the site should look at the "Essentials" section, and take a look at the "Eyes Again" Thread in the Faul section.
Ruins
|
|
|
|
Post by Forum Manager on Jan 12, 2011 4:03:47 GMT
Hello gimmeabreak, Contribute something of value? What would be the point? I'd point you to Paul websites or videos of his appearances since 1966, and you'd say it's fake Paul. It's up to YOU to prove it bud. I'm not the one coming up with ridiculous theories without one shred of evidence, without one ounce of proof. You can try and use the jedi mind trick or try and divert attention away with attempted snappy comments and big words telling me i'm just an idiot flamer passing through to cause trouble but it won't work on me. As i said, it's up to YOU to prove these pigs of yours do fly. I'll be interested in seeing what route you take....evidence or smart-arse. How about...neither route. It's not up to anyone here to prove it to you. It's up to you to review the information presented, and decide for yourself. You may prove it to yourself one way of the other. Now if you have already made up your own, why ask any of us to convince you otherwise? If it is a CASE CLOSED for you, as you said, you might as well rest easy knowing you've got it all sussed out. So why come here asking us to prove you wrong? Some of your comments are quite telling that you haven't explored this in depth. For one thing, this site is not endorsing a theory that "Paul is dead" and I can assure you not everyone here believes that. There is also a great deal of information presented here, other than photos. The pictures do tell a story but it may require some careful attention for it to reveal itself. What is our purpose? To document information and media that reveals the true history of The Beatles, and consider all possible ideas about what really happened...not just taking for granted any 'official' stories. What each person makes of the information shared here, is up to them. This is a research forum and as such, it is not a place for those who wander in to be convinced or won over by what is presented. If you have a question or observation about something specific, we may be able to find a starting point for a discussion with you. |
|
bandi
Welcome new member
Posts: 7 
|
Post by bandi on Jan 12, 2011 5:18:54 GMT
Hellom Forum Manager and romanruins:
Very nicely said. Excellent.
|
|
|
|
Post by gimmeabreak on Feb 17, 2011 16:45:01 GMT
Ok i've read your replies and you have still not provided anything of worth. Nothing but attention diversion.
I regret trying to find out what's what here because it's just like asking someone in a padded cell to show them the elephant that they claim to see.
As one of you said it's up to me to conclude or some ludicrous nonsense...
I can see no option but to conclude you're all loonies.
The authorities should be checking on all registered users of this LOONEY f**king site because one day, one of you LOONEY f**kING BASTARDS is going to try to assassinate him for some LOONEY f**king reason.
Mark Chapman's the lot of you.
Adieu loonies!
|
|
|
|
Post by bass1965 on Feb 18, 2011 2:37:49 GMT
gimmeabreak,
I am also new to this forum, but have been investigating this whole thing for many years on my own. Call it a hobby if you will. Anyway, I have brought some new PROOF to this forum, and am really just waiting for it to take off. The smoking gun for me is Fool on the Hill (reference Revelation thread). Anyway, Faul states that he wrote and performed this little ditty numerous times over the past 40 years, and I am 100% positive that George is singing this song on the album. There is absolutely no doubt in my mind. There are a few other songs that I believe to be George instead of Faul. Yesterday is another that I suspect being George. Most days I listen to it, I am convinced, but I am still alittle on the fence about that one. I also believe that the time frame for when something happened to Paul was in late 1964 to early 1965, based on the Help album. Everything on this album from the title tot the song titles are very telling. The night before is absolutley not Paul. Anyway, I do truely believe tha Paul died and was replaced. Like you, I am searching for, and have found some proof. Now, how can we get a certified professional audio technician to veriy my finding? Then, once conclusive, how do we publicly call Faul to task on this?
|
|
tarff26
Welcome new member
Posts: 8
|
Post by tarff26 on Apr 18, 2011 14:03:02 GMT
haha, i find it cure that after 2 years romanruins is still thinking of me!
gimmeabreak - i wouldnt worry too much about romanruins, he/she is known for taking a flying leap into the dramatic and aggresive whenever a new poster questions ANYTHING
|
|
|
|
Post by devanaustin on Apr 25, 2011 16:48:39 GMT
Have none of you watched the new documentary called "George Harrison's Last Testament? I can not find any reference to it on any of the forums and where can I start a new thread?
|
|
