average Paul and Faul/New PID evidence

[ReallyReallyDead]

I had just got the strange idea to make an "average" Paul and an "average" Faul. I finally got around to it, and here's what I came up with:



Then fade them with a trusted method, eyeline to nose base:



and get this:



Chew on that, PIAers!

PIDers, discuss!

[beldabeast]

Interesting ! What do you mean by average ?

[peoplescommittee]

Well, they can chew on this: In one picture, his mouth is closed. In the second, it's open. That is one difference that could throw off the whole thing. [And in the Paul picture, he appears to be closer to the camera than the Faul picture.]

[ReallyReallyDead]

beldabeast said:

Interesting ! What do you mean by average ?

I overlayed a bunch of pix of Paul and Faul

Well, they can chew on this: In one picture, his mouth is closed. In the second, it's open. That is one difference that could throw off the whole thing. [And in the Paul picture, he appears to be closer to the camera than the Faul picture.]

what?

[peoplescommittee]

Ahem..."Faul" has his mouth closed. "Paul" has his mouth slightly open and is closer to the camera. That could throw things off a bit.

[Dr.No]

I agree, while finding an average is a good idea, the loss off detail and the technical visual factors make it useless.

[ReallyReallyDead]

yeah, but it still looks pretty cool ;D

[abbey]

The mouth probably does make a difference. but good try RRD. Practice makes perfect and I would even try to do those fades. Wish I knew how.

[ReallyReallyDead]

there is a free program called PhotoPlus (http://www.freeserifsoftware.com/software/PhotoPlus/default.asp) that Fright Wolf uses, if you don't have Photoshop.

I make all of mine on Photoshop Elements

[Turpin]

Millions/billions of dollars would be lost, not to mention the litigation that would follow if the truth about Faul was to become widely known. For that reason, forums stating the obvious (i.e. that Faul is a Paul substitution) include moles whose job it is to refute all proof of the Faul imposter. These moles deny the bleeding obvious, time after time. They know that at least 50% of people can be intimidated or embarrassed into denying what is in front of their eyes. The rest of the time, the moles create diversions and red-herrings. They and the people they represent are determined at all costs to ensure the Paul is Dead message does not gain widespread acceptance.

But, no matter what the moles claim, it is beyond dispute that Faul is not Paul. ' They ' are desperately doctoring old film and photos. The Beatles dollar-value seems destined to grow and the ghoulish creators of Faul intend to continue reaping financially from their 40-plus years charade. They delight in 'fooling the sheepies/useless eaters' (as they term us).

Personally, I trust my own eyes and they show me very clearly that Faul is NOT Paul McCartney. So moles are wasting their time trying to convince me otherwise and would do well to remember that you can't fool all of the people all of the time.

The OP did very well in the above illustration. And he's right; the clue to the Faul is NOT Paul debate lies very much in the fact that Faul's face is ridiculously long. The only real question to be answered is how did so many fall for the Faul-substitution for so long ?

Of course, the media is controlled by the same people who arranged the Faul substitution and John and George's deaths. If we had an even half-independent media, the Faul Farce would have been made public knowledge decades ago.

So totally corrupted and controlled is our media now, that even if Faul made a public confession, the media would never print or show it. But one of the nicer parts of each day is knowing that Rupert Murdoch (anglicized surname there) gets closer to death with each passing hour. And frankly, I hope God (in whom Murdoch and his fellow-satanists do not believe) will have NO mercy on his putrid soul or whatever it is inside him.

[byrdsmaniac]

But tell us how you really feel, Turpin.

[ReallyReallyDead]

i concur, no amount of doctoring or denying or etc. will ever convince me that these 2 men:



are one and the same.

[ReallyReallyDead]

egad! I almost forgot!

[abbey]

Turpin, I for one am VERY Happy to see you joined us! RRD, the mouth being open may make a slight difference, but we all know that JPM was replaced by a total idiot named Bill or whatever his real name is. Too bad we can't discover his real identity. The Crown is behind all this and they have sufficiently buried any evidence of who Bill used to be just as they have done a major cover up in Paul' death.

I was told the house on Cavendish is now part of the National Trust. There is a member going to Liverpool and she will see if visitations are possible and if this much is true. I am sure Bill was haunted by Paul's spirit which is why he left the house. Unfortunately, he and Linda trashed it first.

Turpin, Bill and his followers, including Ringo, will not be happy when they die. George, John, and many others will be waiting to greet them and it won't be a happy reunion for the evil ones. You were right in saying John and George were murdered and because George confided in his close friend Eric Claption, Eric has been replace. I think that Feric wanted out of the deal and to show him they meant business, they threw his 4 yr old son out the window. TPTB have no feelings, no compassion, no human feelings and don't much care who they kill or torture.

Paul was not a fighter, nor a particulary brave person, a serious threat or even breaking fingers would have made him re-think leaving the group.

[ReallyReallyDead]

abbey said:

I think that Feric wanted out of the deal and to show him they meant business, they threw his 4 yr old son out the window.

Huh? I thought that was an accident.

Oh I get it, they made it look like an accident...