|
922
Feb 2, 2012 19:07:48 GMT
Post by fishdelusions on Feb 2, 2012 19:07:48 GMT
Good stuff!
This actually feeds into my premise as well. The potential destruction of the Jewish population in WWII would necessitate God's intervention as defined in Revelation. What inspired Hitler's belief system? Henry Ford and the International Jew...
|
|
|
922
Feb 4, 2012 19:26:15 GMT
Post by fishdelusions on Feb 4, 2012 19:26:15 GMT
OP=Ordinal Position? Using a bit of liberty in considering 64 one word and omitting the word With in A Little Help from My Friends as shown on the Back Cover lyrics... 1.Sgt. Peppers Lonely Hearts Club Band 19-16-12-8-3-2=60 2.A Little Help From My Friends 1-12-8-6-13-6=46 3.Lucy In The Sky With Diamonds 12-9-20-19-23-4=87 4.Getting Better 7-2=9 5. Fixing A Hole 6-1-8=15 6.She’s Leaving Home 19-12-8=39 7. Being For The Benefit of Mr Kite 2-6-20-2-15-13-11=69 8. Within You Without You 23-25-23-25=96 9. When I'm Sixty-Four 23-9-19=51 10-Lovely Rita 12-18=30 11. Good Morning Good Morning 7-13-7-13=40 12-Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band Reprise 19-16-12-8-3-2-18=78 13-A Day In The Life 1-4-9-20-12=46 60+46+87+9+15+39+69+96+51+30+40+78+46=666 Maybe the badge holds a different significance? Attachments:
|
|
|
922
Feb 6, 2012 15:20:02 GMT
Post by fishdelusions on Feb 6, 2012 15:20:02 GMT
As Beacon pointed out earlier, if Lonely Hearts, using ordinal position, were to be in use by the Beatles to send a message, using British date structure would be in fact August 12th, with December 8th then being the "what is being communicated through them" piece.
August 12th 1966 being John Lennon's apology for more popular than Jesus, which was a completely accurate statement misconstrued by the southern US and the media.
--------------
Re: Paul Is Dead True Story « Reply #13 on Aug 12, 2007, 1:18am » Once upon a long ago, lived four young lads I'm sure you know. The other three, you know them two. You'll know me better when this is through. Before the band was on the run, a natures child followed the sun. And soon the four became a three, a list of clues for those to see. A story told in fine detail, to keep the loonies on the trail. A coin, a sheep, a favored son, were welcomed guest when the day was done. Now, those days are gone, the stories told, in rivers of ash, and urns of gold. A final hint to all of those, who refuse to see the Emporer's clothes.
Apollo C. Vermouth
-----------------
Apollo's final post. Remember that Apollo talked of what he was at liberty to say on September 3 2006.
Beacon, note the date of Apollo's last post...
|
|
beacon
Contributor
http://beaconfilms2011.blogspot.com/
Posts: 79
|
922
Feb 6, 2012 17:24:35 GMT
Post by beacon on Feb 6, 2012 17:24:35 GMT
Not sure that I understand your point about Ordinal Positions and how that relates to the mirroed date on the Sgt. Pepper drum, however, the corelation with the final Apollo C Vermouth date is interesting.
I thought it was worth posting the full transcript of that August 12 1966 interview, it is very interesting.
Q: "Mr. Lennon, we've been hearing a great deal of interpretations of your comment regarding the Beatles and Jesus. Could you tell us what you really meant by that statement?"
John: "Uhh. I'll try and tell ya. I was sort of deploring the attitude that... I wasn't saying whatever they were saying I was saying, anyway. That's the main thing about it. and uhh, I was just talking to a Reporter - but she also happens to be a friend of mine and the rest of us - at home. It was a sort of in-depth series she was doing. and so, I wasn't really thinking in terms of P.R. or translating what I was saying. It was going on for a couple of hours, and I just said it as - just to cover the subject, you know. and it really meant what... you know, I didn't mean it the way they said it. It's amazing. It's just so complicated. It's got out of hand, you know. But I just meant it as that - I wasn't saying the Beatles are better than Jesus or God or christianity. I was using the name Beatles because I can use them easier, 'cuz I can talk about Beatles as a separate thing and use them as an example, especially to a close friend. But I could have said TV, or cinema, or anything else that's popular... or motorcars are bigger than Jesus. But I just said Beatles because, you know, that's the easiest one for me. I just never thought of repercussions. I never really thought of it... I wasn't even thinking, even though I knew she was interviewing me, you know, that it meant anything."
Q: "What's your reaction to the repercussions?"
John: "Well when I first heard it, I thought 'It can't be true.' It's just like one of those things like 'Bad Eggs In Adelaide' and things. and then when I realized it was serious I was worried stiff, you know, because I knew sort of how it'd go on. and the more things that'd get said about it, and all those miserable looking pictures of me looking like a cynic, and that. and they'd go on and on and it'd get out of hand, and I couldn't control it, you know. I can't answer for it when it gets that big 'cuz it's nothing to do with me then."
Q: "A disc jockey in Birmingham Alabama, who really started most of the repercussions, has demanded an apology from you."
John: "He can have it, you know. I apologize to him if he's upset and he really means it, you know, I'm sorry. I'm sorry I said it for the mess it's made. But I never meant it as a lousy or anti-religious thing, or anything. You know, and I can't say anymore than that. There's nothing else to say really, you know - no more words. But if an apology - if he wants one, you know, he can have it. I apologize to him."
Q: "Why is it that the American journalists did not treat it in the same light?"
John: "I don't know. I think it's because, when it came out in England it was a bit of a blab-mouthed saying anyway, but they could sort of... A few people wrote into the papers, and a few wrote back saying, 'So what he said that. Who is he anyway,' or they said, 'So, he can have his own opinion.' and then it just vanished. It was very small. But by the time it got... you know, when it gets over here and then it's put into a kid's magazine, and just parts of it or whatever was put in, it just loses its meaning or its context immediately, and even moreso. and it's miles away and everbody starts making their own versions of it. You know, I think that's how it... whatever you said."
Q: "John, are you familiar with - that in the American press, a great many ministers have agreed with you in the full context of what you said, and that most of the concern and oversimplification of what you said came from what we call the 'Bible Belt,' quite notorious for christian attitude?"
Paul: "Yeah. The thing is that they seem to think that by saying that, you know, John's gettin' at them. But he isn't at all, you know. It's just a straight comment on something, which may be right and may be wrong, but he's gotta answer as he feels honestly, you know. and if they think that for him to say that is wrong then they don't believe in free speech, you know. and I thought everyone here did."
Q: "The point is, by many thinking Americans, it was just that."
Paul and George: "Yeah."
Paul: "That's it. Well you know, and it's..."
George: "But they always write about the bad things much more than the good things, anyway. So that's why it got to this scale."
Q: "It's always the 'Superior' Americans that are more verbal."
(laughter)
John: "Well, you know..."
Paul: "Well, good luck to them. That's what I say."
Q: "Do you personally believe...?"
John: "I think that... My views are only from what I've read or observed of christianity and what it was, and what it has been, or what it could be - it just seems to me to be shrinking. I'm not knocking it or saying it's bad. I'm just saying it seems to be shrinking and losing contact."
Paul: "and we all deplore the fact that it is, you know. That's the main point about it all."
John: "Nothing better seems to be replacing it, so we're not saying anything about that."
Paul: "and if you say something that you think may vaguely in a way be helpful, you know... because if it is on the decline in any way, then to say it's on the decline must be helpful, rather than destructive, you know."
John: "It's silly going on saying, 'Yes, it's all fine, and yeah yeah, we're all christians and we're all doing this' when we're all not doing it. You know, I just said what I thought."
Paul: "and you know, they'll probably say we said we're for christianity now."
(laughter)
Q: "Mister Lennon, are you all christians?"
John: "Well, we were brought up... I don't profess to be a practicing christian."
Ringo: "Yeah."
John: "Although, I think Christ was what he was, and if anybody says anything great about him, I believe. But I'm not a practicing christian like I was brought up to be. But I don't have unchristian thoughts!"
(laughter)
Q: "Was there as much repercussion and reaction to your statements throughout Europe and other countries of the world as there was here in America?"
George: "No."
John: "I don't think Europe heard about it. They will now."
(laughter)
John: "But it was just England. and I sort of got away with it there inasmuch as nobody took offense and saw through me. and over here it just, you know... what I said. It just went the other way."
Q: "Some of the wires this morning on UPI said that Pan American had provided each of you with Bibles."
Paul: "We never did see it, though."
John: "We never saw that."
Q: "Mister McCartney, could you tell us what the meaning of your line in your latest song concerning Father MacKenzie who writes sermons that nobody hears."
Paul: (exhales) "See, that's the same thing. That's exactly the same thing, you know - that there do happen to be people connected with religion who do write... you know. I mean, It was a song about lonely people."
George: "and it's a generalization, anyway, isn't it."
Paul: "But it was just a song about one lonely person who happens to be this priest who's darning his socks at night, you know, and he's lonely. That's all there was to it."
John: "and Eleanor was pretty lonely, Paul. You told me Eleanor was."
Paul: "and Eleanor was lonely. Hmm."
(laughter)
Paul: "But that's what that means, you know."
Q: "What about your further comment, also in that same series of interviews, that America is a lousy country where anyone who is black is called a n****r."
Paul: "Well, you see, this is it - that if you say anything against, say, the way Civil Rights gets treated over here, then there are bound to be extremest people who'll think that we're wrong for saying that colored people are the same as white people, you know. But I honestly believe that. and if anyone wants me to give the showbiz answer 'We're just good friends,' I will, but I personally believe it's better to be honest about it."
Q: "Don't you have that same situation, however, existing in England?"
Paul: "Oh yeah. It's existing everywhere, you know, but it's about time people..."
George: "...did something about it."
Paul: "I mean, everyone here knows it is, you know. It just needs to be said occasionally, that's all."
Q: "I think, John, that if Jesus were alive today, in the physical form not a metaphysical one, he would find 'Eleanor Rigby' a very religious song. A song concerned with human experience and need."
Paul: "Yeah."
Q: "I'm curious about your impression of that."
John: "Well, you know, I don't like sort of supposing that somebody like Jesus was alive now and pretending - imagining what he'd do. But I mean, if he was Jesus and he held that he was the real Jesus that had the same views as before, well 'Eleanor Rigby' wouldn't mean much to him. But if it did come across his mind, he'd think that, probably."
Paul: "It was written because there are lonely people, and uhh, it was just a song about..."
George: "and we had to have another track to fill up the LP."
(laughter)
Paul: (laughs) "Anyway, what you said is right."
(laughter)
Q: "Do you think the Americans lack a sense of humor?"
Beatles: "No."
Paul: "The thing is, you know, when we talk about all these things you say 'The Americans,' but as you said, the Americans can't all be the same person. They can't all think the same way, you know. Some Americans lack humor and some Britains lack humor. Everybody lacks it somewhere. But there are just more people in the States so you can probably pick on the minority classes more, you know."
Q: "I read something recently that you were..."
John: (jokingly) "Never said it!"
(laughter)
Q: "...worrying about the Beatles being brought down - that certain people were interested in getting the Beatles over with."
John: "Oh, I don't know. I think that's a bit of one that's... you know, I don't really know about that story, honestly."
George: "Sounds like a homemade one."
John: "There's nobody, sort of, get... pull us down. I'd agree, that if we were slipping, there's lots of people that'd clap hands daddy-come-home."
Q: "What kind of people do you think would be interested in..."
John: "I don't know, because they never show themselves until that time arises when it's right for them."
Q: "Do you feel you are slipping?"
John: "We don't feel we're slipping. Our music's better, our sales might be less, so in our view we're not slipping, you know."
Q: "How many years do you think you can go on? Have you thought about that?"
George: "It doesn't matter, you know."
Paul: "We just try and go forward and..."
George: "The thing is, if we do slip it doesn't matter. You know, I mean, so what - we slip and so we're not popular anymore so we'll be us unpopular, won't we. You know, we'll be like we were before, maybe."
John: "and we can't invent a new gimmick to keep us going like people imagine we do."
Q: "Do you think this current controversy is hurting your career?"
John: "It's not helping it. I don't know about hurting it. You can't tell if a thing's hurt a career or something - a space of time - until months after, really."
Q: "You were also quoted as saying that you were not looking forward to the American tour, and that the only part of the tour that you really wanted to get to was the California part of the tour."
George: "I think I said that."
John: "Well, somebody probably said, 'Which place do you like best in America,' and we probably said, 'We enjoy L.A. most because we know alot of people there.' and that's how that comes to be 'We only want to be in L.A.' You know, it just so happens we know a few people there, and we usually get a couple of days off, so we usually say L.A."
George: "We usually eat different food from hotel food. (jokingly) Not that there's anything wrong with hotel food!"
(laughter)
George: "But, you know, it's a break from hotels because we get a house."
Q: "Are there any southern cities included in your tour this trip?"
Paul: "Yeah."
John: "Memphis, we're going there. Yeah."
Q: "What is your feeling about going down south where most of this controversy has arisen?"
John: "Well, I hope that if we sort of try and talk to the press and people and that, you know, you can judge for yourselves what it meant, I think, better by seeing us."
Paul: "The thing is, if you believe us now - what we're saying, you know - and we can get it straight, then uhh..."
John: "It might get through."
Paul: "'Cuz, I mean, we're only trying to straighten it up, you know."
John: "'Cuz we could've just sort of hidden in England and said, 'We're not going, we're not going!' You know, that occured to me when I heard it all. I couldn't remember saying it. I couldn't remember the article. I was panicking, saying, 'I'm not going at all,' you know. But if they sort of straighten it out, it will be worth it, and good. Isn't that right, Ringo?"
(laughter)
Q: "Do you ever get tired of one-another's company?"
John: "We only see each other on tour - all together as four at once, you see."
Q: "To what do you ascribe your immense popularity?"
John: (jokingly to Paul) "You answer that one, don't you?"
Ringo: "I thought Tony Barrow answers that one."
Paul: "Really, if you want an honest answer, none of us know at all."
Q: "This is your third trip to Chicago. Have you had a chance to SEE Chicago yet?"
Paul: "No, we - It looks nice out the window!"
(laughter)
George: "This is the first time we've actually stayed here, I think."
Q: "Do you hope to someday see some of these places that you've just flown in and out of?"
George: "We can go to everywhere, really, I suppose. Everywhere we want to go when... (jokingly) 'when the bubbles burst.'"
Paul: (laughs)
(laughter)
Q: "John, Your music has changed immensely since you first started out. Is this because you've become more professional, or is it that you're trying to show the public..."
John: "It's not trying, or being professional. It's just, you know, a progression."
George: "It's trying to satisfy ourselves, in a way. But you know, that's why we try and do things better - because we never get satisfied."
John: "It's only that, you know. It's not sitting 'round thinking, 'Next week we'll do so-and-so and we'll record like that.' It just sort of happens."
M.C: "Can we make this the last question please."
Q: "Yeah. A short one for Ringo."
Ringo: (jokingly) "Oh, no!"
Q: "Two weeks ago, we had a World Teenage show here in Chicago."
Ringo: (jokingly) "and you won."
Q: "There was a set of drums there on the floor, cordoned off, that said 'These are the drums that Ringo Starr will play when he's in Chicago.' Now today at the airport, I saw some girls screaming when they saw an instrument case, apparently containing your drums, being loaded into a truck. Which drums are yours? Where are they?"
Ringo: "Well, I hope they're both mine. I don't know. Malcolm (Mal Evans) will tell you about that, you know - He just puts 'em in front of me. I just play them."
(laughter)
Ringo: "He's the one who... Have we got two kits? No? ...oh, don't tell 'em that."
Q: "One more question regarding your marital status. Has there been any change that you could tell us about?"
Paul: "No, it's still three down, and one to go."
(laughter)
M.C: "Thank you very much."
(Reporters applaud)
Beatles: "Thank you!"
|
|
|
922
Feb 7, 2012 15:45:23 GMT
Post by fishdelusions on Feb 7, 2012 15:45:23 GMT
Beacon I don't think it has anything to do with how it appears mirrored; I think Lonely Hearts straight on is meant to track back to August 12th 1966 and the L and H is what conveys it.
How many Sgt. Pepper songs have an L and H in the title? Quite a few...not saying it's the entire answer but I think the main intent was a response to more popular than Jesus.
|
|
|
922
Feb 7, 2012 19:44:58 GMT
Post by fishdelusions on Feb 7, 2012 19:44:58 GMT
...however to see this only in terms of what the Beatles intended is to be shortsighted I think.
Datebook published the more popular than Jesus article on July 29th 1966 which just so happens to be the same date as Bob Dylan's motorcycle accident at Woodstock.
Apollo made mention over at NIR that the Walrus is never mentioned in Sgt. Pepper and yet can be found with a mirror on the cover.
Meaning that the Beatles themselves may have realized that the cover had taken on a life of it's own in providing clues beyond those that they themselves had intended.
So its quite possible in dissecting the subsequent clues after Pepper that they are also pointing to the "magic" as being present and beyond what they were trying to accomplish.
Maxwell's Silver Hammer talks of pataphysics and involves a focused Karma that seems to achieve a purpose (like a supernatural intervention). The myth of the Silver Hammer is that the reigning Pope is tapped three times when suspected dead to make sure he isn't just asleep. Of course back then, the Pope was named Paul...
Which sort of seems like the Beatles meant to enlighten some young folks out of Christian bondage and came to discover an agenda working through them at the same time...
|
|
|
922
Feb 10, 2012 18:23:06 GMT
Post by jpmfan on Feb 10, 2012 18:23:06 GMT
From this... ...to this in 922 days. Out of everything I've researched, this is what amazes me most... What amazes you? The degeneration? You do know, don't you, that Morrison was part of the MK Ultra group and therefore part of the Tavistock Agenda? If you do, then none of this should surprise you at all. If not, then you need to do some research about MK Ultra and the influence of the occult and ritual abuse.
|
|
|
922
Feb 11, 2012 14:37:18 GMT
Post by fishdelusions on Feb 11, 2012 14:37:18 GMT
I don't know that Morrison was Tavistock and neither do you. This is through the looking glass but I'm not making up facts to justify it...
I don't mind bringing the agencies into this as it does factor into the bigger story, but given the way that these forums are subject to infiltration I would appreciate sources as well as a declaration that you are not part of one.
I am not, I represent myself only.
|
|
|
922
Feb 11, 2012 20:19:22 GMT
Post by fishdelusions on Feb 11, 2012 20:19:22 GMT
John F. Kennedy was a key figure in BMI vs Ascap. This is a Dave McGowan type assertion; fascinating but it doesn't mean MKUltra killed JFK (or that they didn't for that matter).
The same with Jim Morrison and Tavistock. It's not to be stated as factual unless you have something with attribution asserting that it is...but realistically based on his father having led the fleet in Tonkin in '64 one would assume that he was in the fold in advance had he been connected; so why did they give one of their worst performances ever to get signed by Elektra in '66 and then unleash the Oedipal version of the End two days later when it was irrelevant?
The biggest problem I have with this is the notion that someone held the music back and then gave it away at the right time and then locked it away again. Do you see the problem that involves?
Groups with knowledge and/or spells are replicatable. But the sixties progression (arguably) never happened again...
|
|
|
922
Feb 13, 2012 14:59:11 GMT
Post by fishdelusions on Feb 13, 2012 14:59:11 GMT
Q. Who caused Chappaquiddick? A. Ted Kennedy
The groups do factor in to a point, but their primary function in all of this, as is LSD and psychosis, is to be a shield from a different truth, that of temptation...
As stated, BMI vs Ascap could easily have been a governmental manipulation of pop music. However at the same time:
Little Richard and God-Naturally occurring Jerry Lee Lewis marrying his cousin-His own behavior Chuck Berry and the 14 year old-His own behavior (and a racist judge) Elvis-Naturally occurring Buddy Holly-Fate or otherwise, no evidence of foul play Richie Valens-Same Big Bopper-Same Eddie Cochran-Same
This is through the looking glass. A group may have aided in Payola, but the original Rock and Rollers all went down by their own devices, although a couple could be debatable.
It all added up to the rise of Beatlemania in '63 being as explosive as what it was; you have to discern the difference between what a Tavistock could have done (screaming girls) and what well-placed temptation could have done (changed the entire music industry to aid and facilitate Beatlemania).
|
|
|
922
Feb 13, 2012 16:28:31 GMT
Post by fishdelusions on Feb 13, 2012 16:28:31 GMT
Rosemary's Baby:
Release date of Ira Levin's book, March 12th 1967.
As we know by now, Charles Manson's group at random killed the wife of Roman Polanski and the next night killed a woman named Rosemary.
Mark David Chapman then realizes all of this standing in front of the Dakota, where the movie was filmed, and uses this in part as his rationale for following through on his assassination of John Lennon who happens to live in the building where the movie was made. Of course, as he ruminates about this, Mia Farrow happens to walk right past him on her way to Central Park.
Prominent characters in the book are Minnie Castevet (MC) and her husband Roman, the key characters in fostering a demonic conspiracy.
Pg. 156
"I got the shirt that was in the New Yorker", he said going to the bedroom. "Hey" he called, "On a Clear Day and Skyscraper are both closing".
A bit 9/11'ish, no?
Terry Gionoffrio dies on September 18th 1965 in the book. Rosemary's encounter with Satan then takes place on October 4th 1965. These dates may be recognized as the dates of deaths in 1970 of both Jimi Hendrix and Janis Joplin.
Rosemary later, when trying to piece together the conspiracy against her, remembers back to Roman having lunch with Donald Baumgart, congratulating him on getting the big part that Guy wanted.
She calls Baumgart who confirms that they had drinks one afternoon before Baumgart suddenly went blind, also acknowledging that they strangely exchanged each other's ties that Wednesday afternoon, which Rosemary now understands was necessary to have a personal item of Donald's to perform a spell on Donald in order for Guy to receive the big part.
This particular Wednesday was September 22nd 1965 (9/22)...looking glass ties.
|
|
|
922
Feb 16, 2012 14:48:07 GMT
Post by fishdelusions on Feb 16, 2012 14:48:07 GMT
It's not quite so clear exactly what date Rosemary discovers Adrian (Andrew John), but it is most certainly right at the end of July '66, which in fact mirrors more popular than Jesus being published and Bob Dylan's accident.
Its' all Roman Polanski's fault...
|
|
|
922
Feb 21, 2012 14:56:33 GMT
Post by fishdelusions on Feb 21, 2012 14:56:33 GMT
Sirhan Sirhan waits for Bobby Kennedy in the kitchen with a gun, the only problem being that Bobby Kennedy isn't supposed to go through the kitchen and it takes a throng of well-wishers blocking his path to change his route into the kitchen where he is gunned down.
The night before his death, he has dinner with Roman Polanski and Sharon Tate, days before the opening of Rosemary's Baby in June of '68.
The Stones are recording Sympathy for the Devil when the assassination takes place and change the line JFK to Kennedys to account for Bobby. The roof of the recording studio will catch fire before they are done with the song.
Meanwhile Yardbird Jimmy Page is watching the coverage in Birmingham Alabama of all places and has an epiphany to start a new group...
|
|
|
922
Feb 22, 2012 15:14:20 GMT
Post by fishdelusions on Feb 22, 2012 15:14:20 GMT
No problem then brother, I've had some real interesting encounters in the past year and that fuels my already potent level of paranoia.
I've read all of Dave's stuff, I don't think he takes the leap to factual but his "coincidences" are enough to factor into the equation, that's for sure...
I had a section of my earlier blog postings on Laurel Canyon and that was mostly through reading Dave. Godot Paulekas aka-the golden child was in Life magazine's August 26th 1966 issue (2 days before Crosby showed up at the Beatle LA presser) and his "accident" was 5 days after Tara Browne's on December 23rd 1966.
The main contention I have with the ritual sacrifice/occult connection is the issue of control; Robert Plant in particular seemed to get betrayed immensely in the mid-seventies given their leanings toward Crowley...
|
|
|
922
Feb 25, 2012 14:50:26 GMT
Post by fishdelusions on Feb 25, 2012 14:50:26 GMT
PETER COX co-wrote the book LINDA MCCARTNEY'S HOME COOKING in 1989 and spent many days at the couple's English country estate where he recorded 20 hours of Linda discussing her ideas and life.
According to Cox - 'He also kept talking about John Lennon in the present tense. It was John says this and John thinks that. Very weird. And he spoke about that reference to The Beatles being more famous than Jesus. He said: "Do you realise how much power we could have had if we'd gone to the dark side?" I didn't know quite what to say.
|
|
|
922
Feb 29, 2012 18:18:00 GMT
Post by fishdelusions on Feb 29, 2012 18:18:00 GMT
The Pros and Cons of Hitchhiking 5:01AM
An angel on a Harley Pulls across to greet a fellow rolling stone Puts his bike up on it's stand Leans back and then extends A scarred and greasy hand...he said He said, how ya doin bro? Where ya been? Where ya goin'? Then he takes your hand In some strange Californian handshake And breaks the bone [Whiny person:] "Have a nice day, hehe"
A housewife from Encino Whose husband's on the golf course With his book of rules Breaks and makes a 'U' and idles back To take a second look at you You flex your rod Fish takes the hook Sweet vodka and tobacco in her breath Another number in your little black book
These are the pros and cons of hitchhiking These are the pros and cons of hitchhiking
Oh babe, I must be dreaming I'm standing on the leading edge The Eastern seaboard spread before my eyes Jump, says Yoko Ono I'm too scared and too good looking, I cried Go on, she says Why don't you give it a try? Why prolong the agony all men must die Do you remember Dick Tracy? Do you remember Shane? [Child:] "And mother wants you." Could you see him selling tickets Where the buzzard circles over [Child:] "Shane." The body on the plain Did you understand the music Yoko Or was it all in vain? [Child:] "Shane..." The bitch said something mystical (Hero) So I stepped back on the curb again
|
|
|
922
Mar 1, 2012 15:39:29 GMT
Post by fishdelusions on Mar 1, 2012 15:39:29 GMT
Right on down at the bottom of the sea Tell me are you receiving me? My name is Morse moose and I'm calling you
The grey goose was a steady boat People said she's never float One night when the moon was high The grey goose flew away As we were sailing 'round the rocks The mate took out his compass box And said the wind is like a fox But the grey goose flew away
When out upon the open sea The admiral, the mate and me Prepared to face eternity But the grey goose flew away
She flew into the stormy sea Davy Jones was calling me But heading for tranquillity The grey goose flew away.
|
|
|
922
Mar 2, 2012 17:23:14 GMT
Post by fishdelusions on Mar 2, 2012 17:23:14 GMT
What does Davy Jones and the Grey Goose have in common?
...anyways, an honest question to anyone who's read The Beatles, The Bible and Bodega Bay. Why does Ken Mansfield, now a minister, completely skip from Revolver's release to June of '68 in his book?
Honest question that maybe I missed the answer to while skimming through it: Was he uninvolved between those periods or did he just choose not to talk about the entire MPTJ/Sgt. Pepper/MMT era?
|
|
|
922
Mar 7, 2012 17:20:17 GMT
Post by fishdelusions on Mar 7, 2012 17:20:17 GMT
The KLUE calls previously belonged to a Top 40 AM station in Longview, TX that transmitted on 1280 kHz. KLUE Longview was on the air from approximately 1965 until 1984. KLUE Longview made history in 1966 when they organized one of the first Beatles bonfires in response to John Lennon's more popular than Jesus comment. The KLUE bonfire was held on Saturday, August 13, 1966. The following day, the KLUE broadcast tower was struck by lightning, damaging much of their equipment and sending the news director to the hospital.
...that transmitted on 1280.
|
|