|
Post by Forum Manager on Jul 25, 2003 22:44:16 GMT
I found the Beatles Antholgy book at my library; there's at least 300 or so pictures, and almost every photo in it has been doctored. Every picture of the young Paul is a COMPLETE reconstruction; it looks like they've reverse aged Faul after all the surgery and grafted his head onto Paul's body. It's really scary how real they look; I'll never think about "photographic evidence" the same way again. It's all incredibly seemless, but what's really odd is that there are some photos that they couldn't doctor because they were so widely circulated people would notice, like some of the album photos and photos from Help, and the difference is so incredibly glaring. You have to put a deposit on it to check it out, so I'll get some scans from it when I can get it. I'm starting to think that almost all of the photos of Paul have been doctored to some degree. When you finally see an untouched picture it's like you're looking at a new person all together. I've added some new ones to the conclusion gallery that seem to be authentic, and it is just stunning how small and round Paul's head was; it's as wide as it is tall! And his eyes are so far apart he actually looks a little wall-eyed. --Uberkinder
|
|
|
Post by Forum Manager on Jul 25, 2003 22:46:11 GMT
That proves the conspiracy, the world wide greatest conspiracy. There are on Internet sites with still genuine photos and videos on sale. The problem is to invest money about. Paul_Bearer found many "underground" sites and is able to supply us that links. Could be good a post in this forum with ALL that links. FYI THE BEST documents always from Beatles TRUE collectors! --Sun King I'll have to go back to the library and make some notes of the pages, but it seems like most of the butcher photos in th 1966 section are authentic. The long bangs can acount for some of the small head look, but if you look around you can spot a few photos where his head looks unusually small and round; of course we've only been made to think this is unusual. He never had anything close to Faul's pointy chin. Here's a great picture like this from '66 that Sun_King e-mailed me, along with a few others I've scavenged; they're so unlike the image of Paul we have in our heads: www.anycities.com/user/uberkinder/paulsmallhead.html --Uberkinder
|
|