|
|
Post by rogermexico on Aug 8, 2003 23:08:29 GMT
Hi
As you can guess by the title I'm new to this.
Can't deny the evidence though - it's weird, I always thought there was something wrong about Paul after '66 and when he was in Wings - and now I know what it was!
But there's 3 questions that are bugging me.
Feel free to tell me that all of this has been dug over a thousand times - but:
1: Who wrote the songs he's credited as singing after "Sgt. Pepper" - is there really a 4-year backlog of unrecorded songs?
2: How many people are actually in on this? George Martin, Jane Asher, Billy Preston, Albert Goldman? The list goes on...
3: Has anybody traced the early life of William Sheppard up until he became Faul? Did he really exist? And what happened to him officially?
Sorry if this makes me sound like an idiot, I 'm just really curious...
|
|
|
|
Post by Renee on Aug 8, 2003 23:37:20 GMT
Hi there!  Thanks for joining up with the 60IF forum. To you're left margin, you will notice personal icons and descriptions to be used at your convenience when evaluating a user. To your bottom left of the home page, you will notice the "Info Center" - a fast and expeditious way of finding out everything you need for a fun & safe journey into boardom! |
|
|
|
Post by xpt626 on Aug 9, 2003 0:56:52 GMT
(tugging sleeve)...will you please point this new member to the posts with the info he is looking for? I can't navigate the forum well enough to find them  and I don't want him to think he's being ignored... |
|
|
|
Post by PaulBearer on Aug 9, 2003 4:49:21 GMT
1: Who wrote the songs he's credited as singing after "Sgt. Pepper" - is there really a 4-year backlog of unrecorded songs? 2: How many people are actually in on this? George Martin, Jane Asher, Billy Preston, Albert Goldman? The list goes on... 3: Has anybody traced the early life of William Sheppard up until he became Faul? Did he really exist? And what happened to him officially? Sorry if this makes me sound like an idiot, I 'm just really curious... Welcome to the forums Rogermexico. 1. There was a backlog (which is why the deception began in the first place) but some songs were written by John and "given" to Faul as part of the deal (which John resented). Some song lyrics written by Paul but unrecorded were changed to put in clues. 2. I don't know how many were involved for sure but there is the death penalty for revealing this secret which has been carried out already on a number of people associated with the Beatles including John and probably George - the main author of 60IF. 3. We've tried tracing him but have come up against a blank so far. |
|
|
|
Post by Eggman on Aug 9, 2003 11:41:23 GMT
Welcome friend!!! ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by PaulBearer on Aug 9, 2003 14:31:00 GMT
Not hard evidence no - it's speculation. But we know it's quite possible to do. It all comes down to a case of whether the intelligence service had cottened on to the doucmented proof that George had been compiling. If so, then they might've decided to administer a slow-killing death in order to try to get the truth out of him about the location of the documents, dangling a cure in front of him as bait. It's also possible that George had tried to use the documents as leverage to guarantee his life by actually telling intelligence "You better not kill me or else..." and it backfired on him. But, as I've said, no hard evidence. Just a theory.
|
|
|
|
Post by PaulBearer on Aug 9, 2003 14:59:48 GMT
There's also a strange discrepancy concerning where George died. I'm not quite sure what to make of it. Go here. |
|
|
|
Post by rogermexico on Aug 9, 2003 21:02:54 GMT
Thanx ;D
I'll be keeping a close eye on this from now on
It's certainly got me thinking!
|
|
|
|
Post by mongo on Aug 13, 2003 18:26:09 GMT
Hi, also new here...caught this from a link. Years ago, had dismissed the whole thing as hoax, but then occurred to me the other day-hoaxing Paul's death, for more presence, money, etc, was unecessary-as The Beatles were already riding a heckuva big wave of popularity. Must admit, very interesting, still somewhat undecided, although the forensic studies are very compelling. Couple suggestions that'll really nail this down. DNA. Paternity suits are common, to determine true fathers, in courts of law. Get the guy's dna! Also, fingerprints-are there any fingerprints at all, of the alleged original Paul? Take this further, add in those evidences, and wow, that'd be a case. Still, very, very interesting. Was always bothered by Lennon's murder. Hmn.
|
|
and I don't want him to think he's being ignored...