|
|
Post by onlooker on Sept 8, 2003 16:15:29 GMT
Dear Sun King
You may already know this but....
At the Pete Best forum, Pete just answered the list of questions that had been posted to him. I know you had one there, but as of today, not only was it not answered, it had been completely deleted!
I suppose this is not surprising, but it just goes to show...
onlooker
|
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Sept 8, 2003 17:13:39 GMT
Thank You onlooker! They answered me it was safety for my person ignoring all the facts..... A wrong forum starting with the silhouette as background....because it's James Paul's absolutely not Pete's! |
|
|
|
Post by Eggman on Sept 8, 2003 17:37:45 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Sept 8, 2003 17:38:47 GMT
Pete answered you that!!!  My God!!!!   Yes, My Dear Friend. |
|
|
|
Post by Eggman on Sept 8, 2003 17:39:53 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by onlooker on Sept 8, 2003 17:46:56 GMT
Yes!
So true about the silhouette!
Yes!
I can feel the tension re: the topic. When I saw Pete Best play last month, he would not even look at me or answer the question.
For my safety...and his!
onlooker
|
|
|
|
Post by devilsadv on Sept 9, 2003 12:36:21 GMT
I'm sorry, but I do not understand the meaning of
"They answered me it was safety for my person ignoring all the facts....."
Please explain.
|
|
|
|
Post by Eggman on Sept 9, 2003 12:51:46 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by gharryson on Sept 10, 2003 5:53:53 GMT
it is Pauls silhouette on Bests web site not Pete...and if i understand correctly...it was for petes safety to ignore all the facts?...is that correct?...the silhouette is of the picture that SK has put on the board here....fascinating!
|
|
|
|
Post by gharryson on Sept 10, 2003 6:09:33 GMT
or perhaps it was for sunkings safety.....that's what it is........
|
|
|
|
Post by PaulBearer on Sept 10, 2003 6:23:19 GMT
SK, could we see a copy of the email you got?
|
|
|
|
Post by gharryson on Sept 10, 2003 6:34:26 GMT
that almost seems an admission right there........
|
|
|
|
Post by gharryson on Sept 10, 2003 6:46:55 GMT
the fourth silhouette seems to be john in reverse and made a bit smaller to look like ringo......any thoughts?
|
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Sept 10, 2003 10:24:41 GMT
It was safer for my sake not to pursue this line of inquiry.
|
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Sept 10, 2003 10:35:44 GMT
Please notice:
Ringo was choosen by Brian and James Paul.
So Pete could be the main suspect....
|
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Sept 10, 2003 10:58:40 GMT
Yes.
All the chronologies tell that.
|
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Sept 10, 2003 13:37:27 GMT
Only that one I've just told you.....but the e-mail address I've declared in this forum now is "out of order"....
|
|
|
|
Post by byrdsmaniac on Sept 10, 2003 23:35:55 GMT
Please notice: Ringo was choosen by Brian and James Paul. So Pete could be the main suspect.... I don't understand. So that Pete could be the main suspect of what? |
|
|
|
Post by Forum Manager on Sept 11, 2003 7:46:20 GMT
paul and brian's kidnapping
|
|
|
|
Post by byrdsmaniac on Sept 12, 2003 1:25:56 GMT
I'm lost. Someone please explain the plot this far.
(Thanx.)
|
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Sept 13, 2003 10:42:16 GMT
Pete COULD BE the main suspect. Probably he is not guilty..... |
|
