ivory
Contributor
Meter Maid
Posts: 75
|
Post by ivory on Sept 17, 2003 13:25:23 GMT
First off, I will tell you that my dad is a huge Beatles fan. Well, I thought I'd shown him the information along with 60IF. It was right in front of his eyes, yet he says it is a hoax. He, along with many others want to believe that the Paul McCartney they have listened to all these years is the real Paul. Even with it all in front of them, many still say that we are crazy, but they should at least be able to tell that they are not the same person.
|
|
|
|
Post by Darkhorse on Sept 17, 2003 21:52:03 GMT
The mind will believe what it wants to believe.
I never bought into the whole 'Paul is dead' thing until I saw the forensic facial comparisons. That was enough for me.
|
|
|
|
Post by Eggman on Sept 17, 2003 22:01:00 GMT
The same here!!!  |
|
|
|
Post by eyesbleed on Sept 17, 2003 23:31:42 GMT
I never bought into the whole 'Paul is dead' thing until I saw the forensic facial comparisons. That was enough for me. Ya same here. A friend whose a major Beatles fan won't even take the time to look at the uberkinder site! What's the point, she sez.....It's all gotta be fake anyway! |
|
|
|
Post by reyanthony on Sept 18, 2003 0:35:36 GMT
Same here too. I sent Uberkinder's link to my best friend. We were NY Yankees and Beatles buddies at High School in the late 80's in Brooklyn. She responded a few minutes later, telling me I had too much time on my hands, without obviously checking the site. Kinda made me sad.
|
|
|
|
Post by inmylife on Sept 18, 2003 2:04:38 GMT
Gee, I hope it took a little more evidence than that.
|
|
|
|
Post by reyanthony on Sept 18, 2003 2:51:16 GMT
Gee, I hope it took a little more evidence than that. I'm not sure I understand your post. Do you mean that you hope it took more evidence for me to believe in Faul? It certainly did. It took about 3 hours of research the first night and subsequent months. Which is why I stated that I was a little bummed that my friend wrote back nearly immediately to shoot it down. I sent it as something for her to look in to, she didn't want to bother. Or were you responding to someone else's post? |
|
|
|
Post by Perplexed on Sept 18, 2003 3:50:12 GMT
I picked five friends to show these sites to, and all of them shot me completely down. One guy got pretty vicious with me. I don't really want to bring it up again.
|
|
|
|
Post by inmylife on Sept 18, 2003 4:57:22 GMT
Nope, I was referring to Darkhorse actually. Sorry!
|
|
|
|
Post by reyanthony on Sept 18, 2003 5:01:21 GMT
Nope, I was referring to Darkhorse actually. Sorry! LOL. I get it. Sorry. |
|
|
|
Post by mike on Sept 20, 2003 2:20:17 GMT
The mind will believe what it wants to believe. I never bought into the whole 'Paul is dead' thing until I saw the forensic facial comparisons. That was enough for me. Me too!!!!! |
|
|
|
Post by inmylife on Sept 20, 2003 4:39:25 GMT
Forensic means it would have to be applicable in a court of law. Maybe I'm not too clear on the science/technology of 60IF (and I don't want to be referred back to any FAQ), but what is so ground breaking about it. **A picture that is Paul compared to another picture of what is suspected not to be Paul isn't anymore clearly displayed as not being Paul with the 60 IF features as was just by looking with my naked eyes at the original photos themselves. If it is not Paul in those photos, then it is not Paul. If it is, it is. I couldn't tell before stumbling upon the website and I can't tell after viewing the website. So that is why I asked if viewing the 'forensic' evidence was really the source to believe in your heart that Paul died. I can't accept analysis of head size, shape, plastic surgery because I'm getting all the information third hand. And I do only believe half of what I see, none of what I read.
|
|
|
|
Post by IanSingleton777 on Sept 20, 2003 14:17:10 GMT
 for everybody who doesn't feel there is any solid, visual evidence presented on the PID site, please save yourself time and energy, and posting space here by NOT JOINING this site and running over the same tired "I don't believe it" speech. So you don't see significant evidence when you look at the comparitive photos; that's nice for you, goodbye. But hundreds of others have concluded the evidence is compelling and obvious enough to realize that Paul is dead and being impersonated. We here are constantly seeking and searching for any information which can help solve this mystery. THAT is what the posting site are truly for. So please go back to your Matchbox20 and Third Eye Blind CD's and get lost in the mediocrity. We'll be here trying to get to the bottom of what happened to McCartney in 1966.
|
|
|
|
Post by Forum Manager on Sept 21, 2003 0:29:01 GMT
hey i actually like matchbox 20 and third eye blind!
|
|
|
|
Post by inmylife on Sept 21, 2003 1:45:38 GMT
Funnily enough I don't.  However was I was saying is that the evidence shown wasn't enough for me in itself to prove he actually was killed. Maybe other things do!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Geez. |
|
|
|
Post by inmylife on Sept 21, 2003 2:01:10 GMT
And also your implications that I'm doing this to be a stick up someone's beep beep is insulting. I enjoy it here despite myself!! And I hope you can too! I love the freaking Beatles, what else do you want from me |
|
for everybody who doesn't feel there is any solid, visual evidence presented on the PID site, please save yourself time and energy, and posting space here by NOT JOINING this site and running over the same tired "I don't believe it" speech. 
