|
Post by plastic paul on Jun 13, 2005 23:46:19 GMT
I was just wondering if anyone knows whether faul has ever been asked whether he has ever had any plastic surgery done on his face.
To me it is clear that his nose is different to JPM's, narrower, bonier etc.
|
|
|
Post by beatled on Jun 14, 2005 1:58:24 GMT
I never have run across any mention of that, it's funny, I remember once back in the mid 80's or so, a radio DJ in my area commenting that "Paul McCartney really needed to get some plastic surgery". (don't ask me why I remember that, but it's true) Yeah he did already, but whatever. I found this article on Google news, kinda along these lines, from: news.scotsman.com/features.cfm?id=569412005In midtown Manhattan (where else?) Dr Nicholas Perricone and I are discussing plastic surgery. Would the controversial, multi-millionaire American dermatologist, who reckons he can take years off me in just three days, ever have an eyelift? No, responds the good doctor.
At least, adds the 56-year-old permatanned Perricone smoothly, he isn’t contemplating a facelift just yet. "Although I may have to have it done one day, but not for a long time," he muses. "I don’t want to look 20 years younger than I am, but I sure want to look healthy."
Our talk turns to celebrities and how they look. Paul McCartney’s name comes up and Perricone is off.
"Paul McCartney’s problem is that he’s a vegetarian, which is a mistake, and so he has very poor nutrition. His tissue looks very soft and he has no muscle mass on his body. He doesn’t eat fish, for instance, and that means now that he’s in his sixties his skin has lost all its elasticity." Yikes, I mutter, I’m a vegetarian, too! "Yes, well..." murmurs Perricone, gazing at me quizzically and clearly taking in my rapid, premature ageing and tired, doughy complexion.
"There’s good news though," he adds gallantly, as I choke on my cup of NV Perricone green tea with jasmine flowers, "you are less likely to die of heart disease and certain cancers since you obviously eat a lot of fresh fruit and vegetables." Oh well, that’s all right then, although I am not remotely cheered at the thought that Paul and I are eventually going to make really weary-looking corpses.
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on Jun 14, 2005 8:54:19 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Turpin on Jul 30, 2005 6:14:11 GMT
The reason this entire Faul-farce has not been made public knowledge is because the media is controlled by a group of people who are determined to withhold the truth, about just about everything. These people control the media (print, tv, film, etc) and are the same people who created the Beatles; who controlled the Beatles; who controlled the Beatles 'message'; who contrived the 'youth revolution' and the drug scene (and we all know how successfully and financially rewarding THAT has been).
That's why there have been no serious revelations in the media about Faux Paul, or about his extensive plastic surgery. The media perpetuated the myth that Faul is Paul. The media has lied about virtually ever aspect of the Beatles story, from go to whoa. Anyone who's attempted to reveal the truth has 'died'. The others are paid for their silence or are too terrified to expose the situation. 'The media' is actually a term used to describe ' the lies told to the public by those who control and despise the public '.
|
|