|
|
Post by PaulBearer on Feb 17, 2004 1:45:59 GMT
Brilliant SK, I knew there was an answer! Yet, I see they're already back over on the sceptics forum claiming that you didn't have an answer for them!  |
|
|
|
Post by TTTM on Feb 17, 2004 3:47:06 GMT
So SK, was it you that banned me? I said before you did, to give me a warning.
And resizing is not doctoring.
|
|
|
|
Post by PIDAdherer on Feb 17, 2004 4:40:03 GMT
Why did you ban them in the first place? Its one thing to get rid of trolls, but they were just trying to make sure that you had all of you're facts straight, at least, FP was
|
|
|
|
Post by PaulBearer on Feb 17, 2004 6:49:34 GMT
A slight misunderstanding with internal policy was the cause of this. We will endeavour to see that this doesn't happen again.  |
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Feb 17, 2004 9:02:29 GMT
So SK, was it you that banned me? I said before you did, to give me a warning. And resizing is not doctoring. Resizing photo in a NOT proportional way (proportional way = maintaining the same ratio between Width and Height) IS doctoring. I've banned you (and SURELY I will do it) because you have sent me an e-mail where you wrote that I am a liar without waiting for the reply from me. The truth SHOWS that YOU are the liar, instead. Sun King |
|
|
|
Post by TTTM on Feb 17, 2004 18:47:01 GMT
Resizing photo in a NOT proportional way (proportional way = maintaining the same ratio between Width and Height) IS doctoring. But I DID maintain the same ratio between width and height! What truth? |
|
|
|
Post by PIDAdherer on Feb 18, 2004 4:23:47 GMT
the truth behind 60IS
|
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Feb 18, 2004 9:34:38 GMT
But I DID maintain the same ratio between width and height! But I DID maintain the same ratio between width and height! What truth? There was NOTHING to resize. That YOU are the liar Goodbye Flaming Pie. |
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Feb 18, 2004 9:42:55 GMT
Mistakes on mistakes 72IS Bill Macca actually is 72 years old. Goodbye Within |
|
|
|
Post by MMCDHoward on Feb 19, 2004 2:58:19 GMT
I'm responding to this because it is towards me
Are you then another alias of the late Brian Epstien googoo?
|
|
|
|
Post by PaulBearer on Feb 19, 2004 7:41:09 GMT
What truth?
The TRUTH of Faul's photos is it has been doctored, possibly at the source (Apple) to get the eyes, nose etc to line up. But you see, even when they do this, then other things don't fit like the shape of the chin. The thing about Faul/Billy is - you can squish, sqaush, whatever his photos to match Pauls' in some way but then other things are out of alignment. You can never get them all to perfectly match no matter what you do. That is the TRUTH because Paul and Faul are two different people.
|
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Feb 19, 2004 9:35:47 GMT
Checked. That "Flaming Pie" ( TTTM alias) used a "morphing" program to distort Faul's image. He told that he used "paint" to do that. Liars are always self-injurer. Just small silly people. They don't know that 60IF was given to me BECAUSE I am a pro technician at a very good level. I repeat: before 60IF that was my job. And it still is.  |
|
|
|
Post by devilsadv on Feb 20, 2004 14:48:05 GMT
So Flaming Pie sent you an email where he called you a liar? Well, I am sure he was angry that you were publicly accusing him of altering his pictures when he knew he did not. He had a beef with you, but handled it privately like a gentleman.
But you get on the board and publicly declare him a liar and then ban him so that he can not respond and let people know his side.
I can readily understand now why so many former members are disgusted and upset about the treatment that they received here.
Since you are fond of kid stories, this forum was a goose that laid golden eggs, but you and your brown shirts have killed the goose.
|
|
|
|
Post by PaulBearer on Feb 21, 2004 7:08:38 GMT
That's a matter of opinion. It comes down to underlying motive with some posters. Are they really looking for the truth or are they deliberately planting misinformation. In this case, did FP know the photo was doctered or not? Did he do it himself or was it already done which he did or did not know about? It comes down to a judgement call in the end but sending private messages calling someone a liar is pretty much crossing a line that will get you kicked out.
|
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Feb 21, 2004 12:29:30 GMT
That's a matter of opinion. It comes down to underlying motive with some posters. Are they really looking for the truth or are they deliberately planting misinformation. In this case, did FP know the photo was doctered or not? Did he do it himself or was it already done which he did or did not know about? It comes down to a judgement call in the end but sending private messages calling someone a liar is pretty much crossing a line that will get you kicked out. Oh yes! Flaming Pie in that mail told me that he modified the pictures as they "shoud be". Admission of guilty. Self-explainatory. After the "anthology" operation we have NO MORE NEED of doctored pictures. Thanks |
|
|
|
Post by devilsadv on Feb 23, 2004 14:46:41 GMT
That's a matter of opinion. It comes down to underlying motive with some posters. Are they really looking for the truth or are they deliberately planting misinformation. In this case, did FP know the photo was doctered or not? Did he do it himself or was it already done which he did or did not know about? It comes down to a judgement call in the end but sending private messages calling someone a liar is pretty much crossing a line that will get you kicked out. Yes, it is a matter of opinon, and someone can state his opinion about what FP posted. But, it was not stated as opinion, it was stated as a fact that FP lied and modified the picture. FP states otherwise. If it is crossing the line to call someone a liar in private, why is it ok to do it publicly and not get banned? I know that FP was called a liar. I do not have proof that FP called SunKing a liar. |
|
|
|
Post by PaulBearer on Feb 24, 2004 14:20:18 GMT
You don't need to see the proof devilsadv. Only the moderators need to see the proof to get someone banned. When someone calls us a liar privately, then their motive for being here is suspect. Private insults as opposed to public insults, what's the difference really?
|
|
|
|
Post by kungfuinstructor on Feb 29, 2004 5:35:47 GMT
Bravo, Sun King!
|
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Jul 5, 2005 16:29:16 GMT
Bumpity bump !!!
|
|
|
|
Post by ReallyReallyDead on Jul 5, 2005 16:48:24 GMT
oh! now I get what "bumpity bump" means! It means SMA is bumping a topic up! Until just now I thought it was some kind of rimshot! D'oh!
|
|
|
|
Post by ReallyReallyDead on Jul 5, 2005 17:41:04 GMT
Well I've cheched it Flaming Pie you have streched Faul's photo with "handle" tool No I haven't! I resized them! I know what I did, I haven't stretched them, and I used "paint" so there is no "handle tool". This proves a lot to me about you, SK. Excuse me?!?!?!?!?  Animation made in Photoshop, but both frames made in Paint!!! Paint is capible of streching! |
|
|
|
Post by ReallyReallyDead on Jul 5, 2005 18:10:43 GMT
2 points about FP's comparisons: 1.  In a proper comparison, wouldn't the 2 pictures be proportionally the same size? This could just be because FP had to match the pictures again to do the second of the 2 images 2.  look at the Faul picture, especially the eyes (and one spot on the right side of his hair where it goes in and out! Checked. That "Flaming Pie" ( TTTM alias) used a "morphing" program to distort Faul's image. |
|
Dr.No
Contributor
Posts: 177
|
Post by Dr.No on Jul 6, 2005 10:57:23 GMT
Just a cool note: In the gif animation of Paul above Faul, the movement of the lines managed to synch up with the beat of "Dear Prudence" just now and freaked me out. Also, what are these people with obviously doctored photos doing? They're not helping us, themselves, or the "conspiracy" (duhn dun dunnnnn). If they were 'plants' then they'd have much better fakes then that. Boo! Thumbs Down. Find something else to do.  |
|
|
|
Post by ReallyReallyDead on Jul 6, 2005 12:12:41 GMT
 This fade matches up with the beat of Martha My Dear breifly (freaked me out too ;D) |
|
|
|
Post by ReallyReallyDead on Jul 6, 2005 12:29:26 GMT
I made the exact opposite of this fade because I was bored ;D  |
|
