|
|
Post by xpt626 on Oct 3, 2003 21:06:42 GMT
saw these for sale on ebay. Is it just me, or does the first button (upper left corner) look bizarre?  |
|
|
|
Post by Elidor on Oct 3, 2003 21:18:11 GMT
So, the guy can shape shift. What's the big deal?
|
|
|
|
Post by Darkhorse on Oct 3, 2003 21:45:22 GMT
Notice anytime they stretch a picture of the real James Paul(to make him look more like Faul) it makes his eyes look almost circular.
|
|
|
|
Post by Elidor on Oct 3, 2003 21:50:46 GMT
Can anyone post evidence of photo manipulation. Ie, before and after shots side by side and indicating the addresses the pictures can be found at?
|
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Oct 3, 2003 22:15:44 GMT
Can anyone post evidence of photo manipulation. Ie, before and after shots side by side and indicating the addresses the pictures can be found at? Yes! That is what I am keeping my eye out for. I am visiting used book stores when I can, what I need to be 100 percent with this is a book with photos of James Paul that was printed 1966 or earlier. I'll then compare with books printed later, especially post Photoshop age. If I find anything, up here it goes!  |
|
|
|
Post by Curious on Oct 4, 2003 7:45:17 GMT
You can clearly see that, at the very least, the picture on the top left has been airbrushed extensively - the hair and skin bear the telltale lack of real texture.
|
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Oct 4, 2003 10:03:18 GMT
Can anyone post evidence of photo manipulation. Ie, before and after shots side by side and indicating the addresses the pictures can be found at? : ZioMarco told me the same thing few months ago. You can see the result just clicking herePlease wait a while...to load the animation  |
|
|
|
Post by Rojopa on Oct 4, 2003 13:47:40 GMT
This picture is proof positive of how those people can manipulate early pictures of Paul and make them look like early pictures of Faul.
Can people be so blind as to not see the difference? I am surely glad that I my eyes were opened to the truth.
|
|
Danthology
Contributor
"For awhile we can sit, smoke a pipe and discuss all the vast intricacies of life..."
Posts: 47
|
Post by Danthology on Oct 4, 2003 21:01:55 GMT
S.K. - that is very impressive. Although I am undecided, that is definitly 1 point for the PID threory. I cannot believe how different the original pic looks than the pin pic. I love this message board. Everytime I think PIL(iving) I see something like that which throws me in the opposite direction.
|
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Oct 4, 2003 23:52:26 GMT
S.K. - that is very impressive. Although I am undecided, that is definitly 1 point for the PID threory. I cannot believe how different the original pic looks than the pin pic. I love this message board. Everytime I think PIL(iving) I see something like that which throws me in the opposite direction. I know, it's hard. It was for me too when I received "60IF". I spent really months before opening my eyes! But in the end.... |
|
|
|
Post by TruthUnknown123 on Oct 6, 2003 0:02:11 GMT
I was in denile for alot of time too, I loved that false idea of The Beatles and Paul. I had to come to terms with the truth, then 3 months later I found this site. which proved what I was skeptical about, not the clues, but how different Paul looked from pre-66 to post. The wierd thing is that right before I even sprung the idea in my head that Paul could really have been dead, I listened to all Beatles songs straight in a row, from my own Burned Collection, (over 100s songs that I played). I guess it was sort of a farewell to the Beatles I thought I knew, oh well.  I guess the truth really is The James Paul McCartney is dead. |
|
|
|
Post by byrdsmaniac on Oct 6, 2003 0:07:13 GMT
saw these for sale on ebay. Is it just me, or does the first button (upper left corner) look bizarre? Actually, they ALL look a bit bizarre! |
|
I guess the truth really is The James Paul McCartney is dead.