|
|
Post by Eggman on Oct 14, 2003 3:54:46 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by TheWatusi on Oct 14, 2003 19:53:38 GMT
Strange indeed!!
a further attempt to rid photos of paul and replace them with faul?
|
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Oct 15, 2003 8:12:22 GMT
Is it "official" or it is a joke?
If "official" it's really TOO MUCH!
|
|
|
|
Post by PaulBearer on Oct 15, 2003 11:35:47 GMT
Wait a minute. Didn't John complain to Faul in a letter asking about what had happened to the original cover of "Let It Be" which was supposed to be a spoof of the "With The Beatles" cover? Perhaps this was it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Eggman on Oct 15, 2003 17:44:17 GMT
In agreement of what I read they have there the two covers version of "With The Beatles" album. I will try to post others brazilian covers, there are all strange. It seems to be that in Brazil they have the "normal" covers and other versions too.  |
|
|
|
Post by Curious on Oct 15, 2003 19:41:16 GMT
Any idea what year "With The Beatles" was released in Brazil?
|
|
|
|
Post by Eggman on Oct 15, 2003 21:35:36 GMT
Curious I found this info about this album: Brazilian title: "Beatles again"  (strange title!!!!) First release: 1964 (with original cover) Second release: 1975 (with the cover I posted) |
|
|
|
Post by Curious on Oct 16, 2003 11:50:18 GMT
Thanks, Eggy. If it had been a first release, somewhere around 1967 or 68, it could have made sense, but to change the cover after 11 years - now that's weird.
|
|
|
|
Post by Eggman on Oct 16, 2003 18:11:45 GMT
As always my friend, as always....... |
|
