|
Post by Darkhorse on Nov 17, 2003 14:42:59 GMT
I am having daily confirmations (from Very Important People) that 60IF is what "closer" to the truth. That's enough for me. Except for that ONE major difference which we haven't figured out yet.
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Nov 17, 2003 14:57:27 GMT
Except for that ONE major difference which we haven't figured out yet. Please what difference? Really I can't understand Darky....Please explain me better Ahhhhh are you referring....... Well, ACTUALLY there is NO major DIFFERENCE!
|
|
|
Post by Darkhorse on Nov 17, 2003 18:48:12 GMT
Have you figured out the minor difference SK?
|
|
|
Post by maidels on Nov 17, 2003 20:25:00 GMT
Hi, everyone! Glad to finally be posting something after perusing for a few months.
What an interesting letter! I was thinking about this for a few days and I don't believe anyone has mentioned that the "Paul is disfigured and mentally incapacitated" post doesn't explain the physical changes documented in Brian Epstein, too. Although there is alot less pictoral evidence to make a case for the disappearance of Brian, the photos that Uberkinder has posted are pretty convincing.
I suppose from an analytical point of view, Paul's and Brian's disappearance don't have to be linked, nor do either of them have to be dead, but 60IF does that rather nicely as a megatheory. Anyway, this insight sways me more toward 60IF and the PID theory. Hope I haven't regurgitated old news. Any thoughts?
|
|
|
Post by xpt626 on Nov 17, 2003 21:14:35 GMT
[glow=red,2,300]WELCOME[/glow] maidels ;D
|
|
|
Post by MrKite on Nov 20, 2003 9:47:02 GMT
Howdy, folks!
Still waiting for this weekend to come around so I can get to whatever info I may have in my attic. However, I have contacted that acquaintance I told you about (Louis). Not surprisingly, he has quite a bit of info from [my friend] concerning PID. He has documented evidence on a William Shepherd and family, what seems to be a photo of a very peculiar grave, and a photo of the back door to Abbey Road (I think - it's similar to a door you all have posted already, but only half the door is showing) with instructions on what to find in it! I'm working to corroborate whatever info I can before I post. I'm also trying to figure out how to post images. If this stuff is true, it's pretty out there! I'll fill you in when I can!
|
|
|
Post by LUCY on Nov 20, 2003 14:10:53 GMT
Howdy, folks! Still waiting for this weekend to come around so I can get to whatever info I may have in my attic. However, I have contacted that acquaintance I told you about (Louis). Not surprisingly, he has quite a bit of info from [my friend] concerning PID. He has documented evidence on a William Shepherd and family, what seems to be a photo of a very peculiar grave, and a photo of the back door to Abbey Road (I think - it's similar to a door you all have posted already, but only half the door is showing) with instructions on what to find in it! I'm working to corroborate whatever info I can before I post. I'm also trying to figure out how to post images. If this stuff is true, it's pretty out there! I'll fill you in when I can! please do!
|
|
|
Post by MrKite on Nov 20, 2003 20:27:37 GMT
Still working on some things, but from the info I've received, it looks as though a William Shepherd and family, from Gargrave, Scotland, ceased to exist (all five of them) in late 1967. He had a wife and three children, all of which "died date unknown." The youngest was born in mid-1967, being given the Shepherd name, only to die "date unknown" shortly afterwards (after the "success" of Sgt. Pepper?).
Sounds like a witness protection program.....
Still looking for corroboration.
BTW, William was a sheep farmer by trade and was born in 1932!!!!!!!
[edited to add the last statement]
|
|
|
Post by Curious on Nov 20, 2003 20:34:21 GMT
That would certainly bear out my contention that the voice on Faul's material is a lot older than Paul's material.
|
|
|
Post by MrKite on Nov 20, 2003 20:41:05 GMT
Also, (and I feel funny saying this because I am one too), William was allegedly a mason...as was McCartney himself!
Apparently - if [my friend] wasn't totally off his rocker - many answers lie in Gargrave.
|
|
|
Post by Delta on Nov 20, 2003 22:30:53 GMT
If Billy was a Scotsman all along and not a Canadian, do the references to Canada only indicate Terry Draper? At the beginning of the switch, they both replaced Paul: Terry was the voice and Billy the face, right? So: OPP --> Terry; Billy Shears --> William the sheep farmer. Does anyone have anything more on Terry's background?
|
|
|
Post by MrKite on Nov 20, 2003 23:18:39 GMT
OK, folks, here we go! I was able to corroborate something! According to papers from [my friend], William married a Gladys Margaret Thwaite in 1956 in Gargrave, Scotland. They had three children - Sylvia, Helen, and Robert. All of them "vanished" (died?) - dates unknown. The corroboration is from some family's genealogical website. Get this, the actual page is "dead." I found it through a search of cached pages. Here it is...middle of the page: Click this: 216.239.39.104/search?q=cache:ROTxbCUL5CAJ:www.tomkinshome.com/familyweb/aqwg65.htm+william+shepherd+helen+sylvia+thwaite&hl=en&ie=UTF-8 And then: Upon reaching the page, nothing will load unless you press the link at top that reads: www.tomkinshome.com/familyweb/aqwg65.htmThese people "fell off the face of the earth," supposedly according to Gargrave registries, by Sept. 1, 1967. Perhaps the replacement plan was tentative at first? And after Pepper they realized they could make it fly? And AGAIN, can someone tell me how to post pictures? I've asked a few different times, receiving no reply. I want to post the pic of the door (if what I've been told is true, you all are missing the clue) and a pic of a quite peculiar gravesite from a Masonic cemetery in Gargrave. Do you all want to see this stuff, or am I just spinning my wheels? PLEASE help!! Edited: I think the "unk." next to the name might not mean date of death is unknown I think it may mean it is unknown whether or not they are still alive. Look at some of the other names on the list.
|
|
|
Post by Delta on Nov 20, 2003 23:38:29 GMT
images aren't really posted on this board, only linked to. so you would need a website of your own or someone on this board who is willing to publish your pictures on his/her site for you. this has been done more than once here, who can help this time? then you can use the "picture"-button and substitute "URL" between URL[/img ] for the picture's web-address.
|
|
|
Post by xpt626 on Nov 21, 2003 0:07:53 GMT
And AGAIN, can someone tell me how to post pictures? I've asked a few different times, receiving no reply. MrKite, You need to upload them to a server first. Then you click the icon (over the box you compose your message in) that looks like a "postcard". It is on the second row, just above the "angry" smiley face. It will place a code in the messagebox. Paste the code for your photo over the letters "URL" . If you don't have a server to upload to, I'll be happy to put them up for you. Check your private messages for my email addy.
|
|
|
Post by MrKite on Nov 21, 2003 1:56:53 GMT
|
|
|
Post by MrKite on Nov 21, 2003 2:14:56 GMT
No problem, googoo! I'm as curious about this stuff as everyone else is. I'm not sure what the "correct" story is, but something was obviously going on...hopefully, we'll find out!
I'm working on the headstone pic now - it's really big, so I'm having to resize it to upload - I don't want to crop it.
|
|
|
Post by TotalInformation on Nov 21, 2003 2:39:50 GMT
A) I can't make out that yellow script. What does it say? "Etching of Paul's head and face?"
B) Note that all sorts of people on that webpage "unknown" marked as date of death, not just William Shepherd and his nuclear family.
|
|
|
Post by MrKite on Nov 21, 2003 2:43:09 GMT
Indeed, but that web page was not the original source, either. It at least corroborates my independent info - that he, his wife, and three children allegedly ceased to exist, as per (ostensibly) certain Gargrave registries.
|
|
|
Post by MrKite on Nov 21, 2003 2:44:47 GMT
BTW, Total, you are correct on what the yellow says.
|
|
|
Post by TheWatusi on Nov 21, 2003 3:41:22 GMT
oh, Mr. Kite.... i cant wait to see the gravestone!
|
|
|
Post by MrKite on Nov 21, 2003 3:53:24 GMT
Well, here it is! Please bear in mind, I am simply passing on info that I have received. Supposedly, this gravesite is not listed in the Gargrave Masonic Cemetery registry of graves, yet there it is. What to make of it, I'm not sure, although I have an inkling based on certain masonic procedures...but really none of them even apply directly as I can see. According to the information I've received, the grave itself is empty, although with the information came no evidence other than hearsay to support the claim. I do know I've never seen a headstone with a date like that on it. If it is genuine and applies to JP, what significance is there that William hailed from the same town? That might be getting into aspects of masonic death lore I've not been made privy to, I just don't know. img.villagephotos.com/p/2003-11/498012/zzzzz.JPG
|
|
|
Post by DayTripper on Nov 21, 2003 4:14:30 GMT
Great work on the door, MrKite! One question, though; if the face on the right is Paul, who is just to the left of him in the big hat? Here:
|
|
|
Post by JakesBrie on Nov 21, 2003 4:40:57 GMT
Ok, the grave is chilling, the pictures on the door a great find and the new theory interesting, but may I make a suggestion. No offense, Mr. Kite, but let us not forget that disinformation is a common trick used. Perhaps Mr. Kite's friend was led on false tracks.
I think we should see all he wants to share (and I thank him for doing so), but take this new concept slowly and with many grains of salt.
Brie
|
|
|
Post by Fwings on Nov 21, 2003 8:26:07 GMT
That picture of the grave certainly is chilling...
What does the "19-" below James represent? Is it a way of marking that this person died in the 1900's, without giving away the specific date?
|
|
|
Post by Curious on Nov 21, 2003 9:03:03 GMT
Can I ask why the name on Paul's grave would make it so obvious? Surely James McCartney isn't that common a name?
|
|