Since I'm a relative newcomer, maybe it isn't my place to speak, but I don't feel there's any need to be embarrased. The people here were confronted with possible new evidence, it was debated and guessed about, and in a few short days, it was proven to be false. The job was done, and in a relatively short amount of time.
As 60IF and the newer evidence towards PiD becomes more well-known, there's going to be several cases where things like this occur, and I'm glad that it wasn't dismissed right away, because one of these days something like this could appear, and it could very well be the truth that would unravel the lies that have been occuring since 1966.
I also don't believe MrKite meant any harm by posting this... if his story is true, then he was merely passing along information from a friend. I thank him for sharing.
The dates do look as though they have been retouched, as does the name on both versions of the picture. i've blown it up, grayscaled it, created a negatice image, and there are blocks of solid colour on both versions, although in different places.
Post by TotalInformation on May 22, 2005 2:31:33 GMT
I've given up all hope of contacting this guy, so I guess I can tell what happened.
I was planning a trip to New Orleans around the time that story was first posted. I had gotten in contact with the poster and he had tentatively agreed to meet me to give me copies of the documentation, or loan them to me so I could make copies.
However, at about the same time, I posted my thesis on how JPM's death had many hallmarks of Masonic assassination.
The poster said that he was a third-degree Mason and that couldn't be true.
Getting back to the article about the 3 different Pauls it kind of reminds me of the movie JFK and the book Crossfire. Where there were multiple Oswalds looking similar appearing in public and being photographed. This could mean he is an agent? The 1964 one is real and the other 2 appear where needed?