|
|
Post by andrewexelor on Oct 9, 2005 15:21:53 GMT
first of all, its EXELOR, two, get some glasses for the love of god, because that second one matches PERFECTLY. its OBVIOUSLY a spliced version. third, ....  ^^^^^ MOPED ACCIDENT!or could you NOT read where it says "POST MOPED ACCIDENT" theres clearly a gash on the left side of his face (lip) where his tooth had been chipped plus since you cant even have a good response to the fade but making its name, i laugh at your stupidity. you must think this was some kinda mass conspiracy because the beatles couldnt find someone cute AND talented so they made one and named him "Paul McCartney"? plus your comments to my brother were unwarrented figuring hes RIGHT you know. |
|
|
|
Post by helterskelter on Oct 9, 2005 15:22:22 GMT
bxv, his teeth are different because the middle picture was taken after his moped accident. So he had a chipped tooth. That's the only difference I see. I thought it would be obvious ...
|
|
|
|
Post by andrewexelor on Oct 9, 2005 15:23:21 GMT
heh, posted at the same time...
|
|
|
|
Post by helterskelter on Oct 9, 2005 15:25:26 GMT
Hehe yeah I know. I almost deleted my post because we almost said the same thing.
|
|
moped
Contributor
Posts: 115 
|
Post by moped on Oct 9, 2005 15:44:05 GMT
its OBVIOUSLY a spliced version. This needs to be explained. Because I don't agree one bit. edit: this one?  |
|
|
|
Post by andrewexelor on Oct 9, 2005 15:52:44 GMT
yes
|
|
|
|
Post by TPIMaster on Dec 16, 2005 14:49:59 GMT
Just had to post this. Let's begin. Whats wrong with this picture??  Look again tpi, it isnt even the Beatles.    "Paul" has been heavily disguised, not so many girls looked at George, they didnt bother. Johns a good lookalike, and it aint Ringo by a long shot, Some debunking. My favourite part of the day. If these aren't The Beatles, then the admins can ban my ass here:      Comments, bxv? |
|
|
|
Post by Perplexed on Dec 17, 2005 15:32:00 GMT
Just had to post this. Let's begin. Whats wrong with this picture?? Look again tpi, it isnt even the Beatles. "Paul" has been heavily disguised, not so many girls looked at George, they didnt bother. Johns a good lookalike, and it aint Ringo by a long shot, Some debunking. My favourite part of the day. If these aren't The Beatles, then the admins can ban my ass here: Comments, bxv? Paul and John seem a bit made up, or are they sweating under the lights? Shiny skin; not sure if that's a make-up issue, or just over heated. Ringo --one of those Ringo pics looks like somebody else. And what is with George looking so alien in that one shot? Is my vision going down hill this fast? That must be the Beatles. I think that is the Beatles. Anyone else have a view? |
|
Ludwig
Contributor
"It's all in the mind."
Posts: 101
|
Post by Ludwig on Dec 17, 2005 20:05:16 GMT
Whats wrong with this picture?? hi, where is that photo from? ive found a similar photo of the beatles  thats ed sullivan you cant make it up i dont think The Paul in the second image does resemble JPM in the slightest, IMO. He is waifishly thin , appears to be be taller and has a different possibly older face. Stand-in? I guess I have to allow for some visual weirdness ceated by the orginal source (kinescope(sp)?) I don't know. This thread has forced me to reconsider what I beleived JPM really looked like and has made me feel that those in "power" figured out long ago that the human eye is the most unreliable witness. I fear that I do not know now and will never know what the the real JPM looked like and that appears to have been the plan. |
|
|
|
Post by plastic paul on Dec 17, 2005 23:14:49 GMT
If it isn't the beatles then they are the best lookalikes ever!
There is something slightly wrong somewhere along the lines IMO, but the "JPM" is better than faul ever looked! Which is why i think it has to be THE Beatles.
|
|
|
|
Post by exelenour on Feb 23, 2007 18:01:34 GMT
Remember, he had a moped accident where he injured is lip. Probably some of his teeth were damaged, too. |
|
